全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

成人AngleⅠ、AngleⅡ1和AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形髁突形态和位置的CBCT对比研究
Comparison of Condylar Morphology and Position between Angle Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ Malocclusion in Adults.

DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.03.018

Keywords: 错牙合畸形,髁突形态和位置,CBCT,
Malocclusion
,Condylar morphology and position,CBCT

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 目的: 应用CBCT对无主观关节症状的成人AngleⅠ类、AngleⅡ1类和AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形患者的髁突形态位置进行对比观察研究。方法: 选择AngleⅠ类、AngleⅡ1类和AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形患者各19例行CBCT扫描,应用CBCT专用软件Invivo 5.0分析测量颞下颌关节前间隙、上间隙、后间隙、颞下颌关节窝的深度、髁突最大近远中径和最大内外径等相关参数,并运用SPSS 21.0软件包对3组数据进行统计学分析,比较AngleⅠ类、AngleⅡ1类和AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形患者的髁突形态位置差异。结果: AJS(mm)在AngleⅠ类组与AngleⅡ1类组间和AngleⅠ类组与AngleⅡ2类组间差异有统计学意义;PJS(mm)在3组中两两组间差异均有统计学意义;DMF(mm)在AngleⅠ类组与AngleⅡ1类组间和AngleⅠ类组与AngleⅡ2类组间差异均有统计学意义;MD(mm)在AngleⅠ类组与AngleⅡ1类组间差异有统计学意义。髁突在关节窝的位置AngleⅠ类组主要表现居中位,占50%;AngleⅡ1类组和AngleⅡ2类组主要表现为髁突后移位,分别占55%、84%。结论: AngleⅡ1类和AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形的颞下颌关节前间隙大于AngleⅠ类;AngleⅡ2类错牙合畸形的颞下颌关节后间隙小于AngleⅡ1类,AngleⅡ1类错牙合畸形的颞下颌关节后间隙小于AngleⅠ类;AngleⅡ类错牙合畸形的颞下颌关节后移位

References

[1]  Gorucu-Coskuner H, Ciger S. Computed tomography assessment of temporomandibular joint position and dimensions in patients with class Ⅱ division 1 and division 2 malocclusions [J]. J Clin Exp Dent, 2017, 9(3)∶e417-e423
[2]  Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RW. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in Class Ⅱ Division 1 and Class Ⅲ malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136∶199-206
[3]  Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, et al. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2005, 128∶803-811
[4]  姚霜,刘晓君,柴汝昌,等.不同垂直骨面型成人安Ⅱ患者颞下颌关节的形态特征研究[J].口腔医学研究,2012,28(1)∶47-50
[5]  Katsavrias EG. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class Ⅱ Division 2 malocclusions [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 129∶470e8
[6]  Millett DT, Cunningham SJ, O'Brien KD, et al. Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 10∶CD005972
[7]  Barbosa LAG, Araujo E, Behrents RG, et al. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class Ⅱ Division 2 malocclusion [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(5)∶914-920
[8]  Bae J, Son WS, Kim SS, et al. Comparison of masticatory efficiency according to Angle's classification of malocclusion [J]. Korean J Orthod, 2017, 47(3)∶151-157
[9]  李帅,林薇薇,陈金武,等.成人AngleⅡ<sup>2</sup>错牙合畸形患者髁突位置及颞下颌关节形态的CBCT观察研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2013,29(03)∶389-393
[10]  Wohlberg V, Schwahn C, Gesch D, et al. The association between anterior crossbite, deep bite and temporomandibular joint morphology validated by magnetic resonance imaging in an adult non-patient group [J]. Ann Anat, 2012, 194(4)∶339-344

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133