全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

镍钛器械在3种不同运动模式下预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化
Morphology Changes of Apical Foramen after Root Canal Preparation with Three Different Types of Nickel Titanium Instruments.

DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.02.016

Keywords: 镍钛系统,根管预备,根尖孔表面形态,
Nickel-titanium instruments
,Root canal preparation, Apical surface morphology

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 目的:研究3种不同运动模式下镍钛器械在平解剖性根尖孔长度时预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化。方法:收集新鲜拔除的离体牙60颗,随机分为3组,用扫描电子显微镜拍摄术前片,记录根尖孔表面形态,然后分别采用Twist File Adaptive(TFA)、WaveOne、ProTaper(机用)3种镍钛锉在平解剖性根尖孔的工作长度下进行根管预备,然后在扫描电子显微镜下拍摄术后片,记录根尖孔周围牙骨质的缺损、根尖孔偏移、根尖孔周围表面的裂纹。结果:实验组均出现根尖孔周围牙骨质的缺损、根尖孔偏移、根尖孔周围表面的裂纹。3种镍钛器械根管预备后发生根尖孔偏移、根尖孔周围表面裂纹概率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),3种镍钛器械根管预备后发生根尖孔周围牙骨质缺损概率的差异无统计学意义。结论:TFA和WaveOne在进行预备根管后相比ProTaper可降低根尖孔偏移的发生率,TFA比ProTaper和WaveOne在进行预备根管后产生根尖孔周围表面的裂纹少,降低了根折的风险

References

[1]  Burklein S, Tsotsis P, Schafer E. Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(4)∶501-504
[2]  Yun H, Kim SK. Acomparison of the shappingabilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary insruments in simulated root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiod Endod, 2003, 95(2)∶228-233
[3]  王燕. 比较两种镍钛器械在不同运动模式下预备根管后牙根裂纹的发生率[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2015,25(9)∶549-553
[4]  Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal system: a review[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(8)∶559-567
[5]  Altunbas D. Comparison of various current electronic apex locators to determine the working lengthusing the clearing technique[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2015, 18(3)∶359-363
[6]  黄定明. 根管治疗工作长度确定之惑及解决之道[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2016, 34(2)∶109-114
[7]  Giuliani V, Di Nasso L, Pace R, et al. Shaping ability of waveone primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system used in continuous and reciprocating motion[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(9)∶1468-1471
[8]  Swapna DV. Comparison of third generation versus fourth generation electronic apex locators in detecting apical constriction: An in vivo study[J]. Conserv Dent, 2015, 18(4)∶288-291
[9]  Chueh L H, Chen S C, Lee C M, et al. Tech nical qualityof root canal treatment in Taiw an[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36(6)∶416-422
[10]  Mello-Moura AC, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, et al. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 2010, 43(2)∶142-147
[11]  Kim YJ, Chandler NP. Determination of working length for teeth with wide or immature apices: a review[J]. Int Endod J, 2013, 46(6)∶483-491
[12]  Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, et al. Cyclic fatigue of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion[J]. Int Endod J, 2012, 45(9)∶802-806
[13]  邵彤菲, 侯晓玫, 侯本祥. 往复运动镍钛锉根管预备成形能力的体外研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志, 2014, 32(6)∶606-610
[14]  刘宗响.不同镍钛旋转器械平解剖性根尖孔长度预备根管后根尖孔表面形态变化的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2015,31(5)∶485-489
[15]  Silveira LF, Petry FV, Martos J, et al. In vivo comparison of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators[J]. Aust Endod J, 2011, 37(2)∶70-72
[16]  Bahrololoomi Z. Accuracy of an Electronic Apex Locator for Working Length Determination in Primary Anterior Teeth[J]. J Dent (Tehran), 2015, 12(4)∶243-248
[17]  Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(10)∶722-725
[18]  Wu XC, Zhu YQ. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by single twisted file in three different operation modes[J]. Eur J Dent, 2014, 8(4)∶515-520
[19]  Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Shaping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals [J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(4)∶548-552
[20]  范兵, 吴民凯. 根管偏移对充填材料封闭根管能力的影响[J].口腔医学纵横,2001,17(2)∶83-87

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133