全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

根尖孔大小对牙髓组织再生及牙齿抗压强度的影响
Effect of Apical Foramen Sizes on Dental Pulp Tissue Regeneration and Teeth Compressive Strength

DOI: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.08.010

Keywords: 根尖孔大小,牙髓再生,牙髓干细胞,牙齿抗压强度,
Apical foramen size
,Pulp regeneration,Dental pulp stem cells,Teeth compressive strength

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要 目的:探讨根尖孔大小对牙髓组织再生及牙齿抗压强度的影响。方法:收集因正畸拔除的牙根发育完成、 无牙根折裂的单根下前磨牙,离体牙截冠后,保留12 mm牙根,随机分为5组,每组25颗牙,根管预备至不同主锉号数,分别为30#、40#、60#、80#及100#主锉组,其中30#主锉组为对照组。体外培养人牙髓干细胞并接种于0.25%水凝胶支架中,将其分别注入不同主锉预备过的根管内,每组均取5颗牙,其牙根于Transwell小室分别培养14、21、28 d,提取水凝胶中细胞的总RNA,进行实时定量聚合酶链反应(real-time polymerase chain reaction,Real-time PCR)检测;每组余下的10颗牙,其牙根冠部封闭后植入裸鼠皮下,28 d后取出,5颗进行组织学观察,5颗进行静态载荷实验。结果:Real-time PCR检测牙本质涎磷蛋白(dentin sialophosphoprotein, dspp)、牙本质基质蛋白-1(dentin matrix protein-1, dmp-1)的表达,第28天时,各实验组均高于对照组(P<0.05),且40#主锉组高于其它实验组(P<0.05)。组织学分析表明,30#、40#、60#主锉组均未见连续的牙髓样组织形成,80#、100#主锉组可见组织形成,但未表现出典型牙髓样组织结构。静态载荷实验结果表明,40#主锉组的平均抗压载荷与对照组比较差异无统计学意义,其它实验组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:根尖孔预备至100#(1 mm)以内时,根尖孔大小对牙髓组织再生没有明显影响,但根尖孔预备大于40#时,抗压强度明显下降

References

[1]  Doyon GE, Dumsha T, Von Fraunhofer JA. Fracture resistance of human root dentin exposed to intracanal calcium hydroxide [J]. J Endod, 2005, 31(12)∶895-897
[2]  Yang J,Yuan G, Chen Z, et al. Pulp regeneration: current approaches and future challenges [J]. Front Physiol, 2016,7∶58
[3]  Kling M, Cvek M, Mejare I, et al. Rate and predictability of pulp revascularization in therapeutically reimplanted permanent incisors [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1986, 2(3)∶83-89
[4]  Yang JW, Zhang YF, Wan CY, et al. Autophagy in SDF-1α-mediated DPSC migration and pulp regeneration [J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 44∶11-23
[5]  Iohara K,Murakami M,Takeuchi N,et al.A novel combinatorial therapy with pulp stem cells and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for total pulp regeneration [J]. Stem Cells Transl Med, 2013, 2(10)∶818
[6]  Thonhoff JR, Lou DI, Jordan PM, et al. Compatibility of human fetal neural stem cells with hydrogel biomaterials <i>in vitro</i> [J]. Brain Res, 2008, 1187(1)∶42-51
[7]  皮昕,李春芳,陈中.1282个恒牙根尖孔形态的显微解剖及其临床意义[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(5)∶294-295
[8]  Laureys WG, Cuvelier CA, Dermaut LR,et al.The critical apical diameter to obtain regeneration of the pulp tissue after tooth transplantation, replantation, or regenerative endodontic treatment [J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(6)∶759-763
[9]  Rosa V, Zhang Z, Grande RH, et al. Dental pulp tissue engineering in full-length human root canals [J]. J Dent Res, 2013, 92(11)∶970-975
[10]  吴一梦,张爽,潘爽,等.脐静脉内皮细胞与牙本质浸提液诱导的牙髓干细胞共培养成血管的研究[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(5)∶504-508
[11]  Sakai VT, Cordeiro MM, Dong Z, et al. Tooth slice/scaffold model of dental pulp tissue engineering [J]. Adv Dent Res, 2011, 23(3)∶325-332
[12]  Huang GT,Yamaza T,Shea LD,et al.Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an <i>in vivo</i> model [J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2010, 16(2)∶605-615

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133