全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2017 

慢性泪囊炎两种手术方式的疗效比较 Effect Comparison Between Two Surgical Methods on Chronic Dacryocystitis

Keywords: 内窥镜下经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术,泪囊鼻腔吻合术,慢性泪囊炎

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:比较泪囊鼻腔吻合术与内窥镜下经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术对慢性泪囊炎的疗效,探讨治疗慢性泪囊炎的最佳手术方法。方法:回顾性分析我院2015年1月至2016年3月63例慢性泪囊炎患者手术治疗效果,其中内窥镜下经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术23例,采用传统泪囊鼻腔吻合术40例,术后随访3-6月观察手术疗效。结果:泪囊鼻腔吻合术与内窥镜下经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术治疗慢性泪囊炎的疗效无显著差异(χ~2=1.941,P>0.05)。结论:泪囊鼻腔吻合术与内窥镜下经鼻泪囊鼻腔造口术均是治疗慢性泪囊炎的可靠方法。前者手术视野大,便于解剖结构辨认与手术操作,易广泛应用;后者操作简单快捷、并发症少,微创术后反应及疗效好,有推广前景

References

[1]  Mathew MR,McGuiness R,Webb LA,et al.Patient satisfaction in our initial experience with endonasal endoscopic non-laserdacryocystorhinostomy[J].Orbit,2004,23(2):77-85.
[2]  Lee DW,Chai CH,Loon SC.Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy versus primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy:a review[J].Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2010,38(4):418-426.
[3]  Warren JF,Seiff SR,Kavanagh MC.Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy[J].Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers&Imaging,2005,36(6):446-450.
[4]  Ben Simon GJ,Joseph J,Lee S,et al.External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center[J].Ophthalmology,2005,112(8):1 463-1 468.
[5]  Zaidi FH,Symanski S,Olver JM.Clinical trial of endoscopic vs external dacryocystorhinostomy for partial nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J].Eye,2011,25(9):1 219-1 224.
[6]  王智崇,陈家祺.鼻泪管阻塞的治疗现状[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2001,19(1):3-6.Wang CZ,Chen JQ.Current status of treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J].Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology,2001,19(1):3-6.
[7]  Anijeet D,Dolan L,Macewen CJ.Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J].Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2011,1(1):CD007097-CD007097.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133