全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2016 

玻璃体腔注射Lucentis联合治疗增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变合并虹膜新生血管的临床观察 Intravitreal Lucentis as a Adjuvant Treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopaty Complicated with Iris Neovasucularization

Keywords: Lucentis,增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变,虹膜新生血管,联合治疗

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨玻璃体腔注射Lucentis联合玻切术及视网膜光凝治疗增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变引起虹膜新生血管的疗效观察。方法:回顾性分析从2012年6月至2013年7月在武汉大学人民医院眼科中心确诊为增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变合并虹膜新生血管患者21例(25眼)。每眼均玻璃体腔注射Lucentis 0.5mg/0.1ml,测量术后第1天,第3天,第7天,1个月,2个月视力、眼压及观察虹膜新生血管消退情况。根据眼底视网膜病变程度,于术后1周内21眼行玻切术及视网膜光凝,其中8眼为虹膜新生血管性青光眼,8眼为玻璃体积血,5眼为牵拉性视网膜浅脱。4眼仅行视网膜光凝。结果:与术前视力相比较,术后第1、3、7天、1个月及术后2月视力均有不同程度的提高。与术前眼压相比,术后第1、3、7天、1、2月眼压降低,均有统计学差异。与术前虹膜新生血管分级相比,术后第1、3,7天、1、2月虹膜新生血管分级下降,均有统计学差异。结论:Lucentis联合治疗增殖性糖尿病性视网膜病变引起虹膜新生血管疗效明确,可为早期行眼底激光、玻切术提供手术时机,但每次注药维持时间、每次注射量及远期多次注药频率、并发症等尚需进一步观察

References

[1]  Giuliari GP.Diabetic retinopathy:current and new treatment options[J].Curr Diabetes Rev,2012,8(1):32-41.
[2]  Sugiura Y,Okamoto F,Okamoto Y,et al.Ophthalmodynamometric pressure in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy measured during pars plana vitrectomy[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2011,151(4):624-629.
[3]  Lüke J,Nassar K,Lüke M,et al.Ranibizumab as adjuvant in the treatment of rubeosis iridis and neovascular glaucoma—results from a prospective interventional case series[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2013,251(10):2 403-2 413.
[4]  Ishibashi S,Tawara A,Sohma R,et al.Angiographic changes in iris and iridocorneal angle neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab injection[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2010,128(12):1 539-1 545.
[5]  Jiang Y,Liang X,Li X,et al.Analysis of the clinical efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of iris neovascularization caused by proliferative diabetic retinopathy[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2009,87(7):736-740.
[6]  乔斌,姚毅,赵晴阳.糖尿病视网膜病变玻璃体切除术后新生血管性青光眼原因分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2008,8(8):1584-1586.Qiao B,Yao Y,Zhao QY.Analysis on the factors of neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy[J].Int J Ophthalmol,2008,8(8):1 584-1 586.
[7]  Hufendiek K,Hufendiek K,Panagakis G,et al.Visual and morphological outcomes of bevacizumab(Avasin?)versus ranibizumab(Lucentis?)treatment for retinal angiomatous proliferation[J].Int Ophthalmol,2012,32(3):259-268.
[8]  Schmucker C,Antes G,Lelgemann M.Position Paper:The Need for Head-to-Head Studies Comparing Avastin versus Lucentis[J].Surv Ophthalmol,2009,54(6):705-707.
[9]  Asensio-Sánchez VM.Avastin is not the same as Lucentis,and Lucentis is not the same as Avastin[J].Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol,2009,84(9):427-428.
[10]  Al-Latayfeh M,Silva PS,Sun JK,et al.Antiangiogenic therapy for ischemic retinopathies[J].Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med,2012,2:(6):a006411.
[11]  Beutel J,Peters S,Lüke M,et al.Bevacizumab as adjuvant for neovascular glaucoma[J].Arch Ophthalmol,2010,88:103-109.
[12]  Lim TH,Bae SH,Cho YJ,et al.Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor after intracameral bevacizumab injection in eyes with neovascular glaucoma[J].Korean J Ophthalmol,2009,23(3):188-192.
[13]  Kohno R,Hata Y,Mochizuki Y,et al.Histopathology of neovascular tissue from eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy after intravitreal bevacizumab injection[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2010,150(2):223-229.
[14]  Zenoni S,Comi N,Fontana P.Individualised treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy optimal surgical timing improves long-term outcomes[J].EPMA J,2010,1(1):78-81.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133