全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

一种改进的宽巷引导整周模糊度固定算法
A Modified Wide Lane Bootstrapping Ambiguity Resolution Algorithm

DOI: 10.13203/j.whugis20150462

Keywords: GPS,宽巷,整周模糊度,整数引导,固定错误,
GPS
,wide lane,integer ambiguity,integer bootstrapping,ambiguity resolution error

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

一般卫星导航接收机的伪距测量误差大于宽巷波长。根据宽巷引导模型,直接使用双差伪距取整固定双差宽巷整周模糊度有很大概率会产生一周固定错误。基于此,提出了一种改进的宽巷引导整周模糊度固定算法,针对宽巷整周模糊度一周固定错误进行探测和修复。利用整周模糊度为整数的特质构造理论探测量,并将该探测量与载噪比所确定的门限相比较,判断是否出现宽巷整周模糊度一周固定错误;利用双差整周模糊度自由度为3的特点,修复错误宽巷整周模糊度。对该算法在高斯噪声条件下的可行性进行了理论分析,结果表明正常载噪比的观测数据均可分辨出一周宽巷整周模糊度的估计错误。同时,分析了考虑多径等误差后该算法所能接受的载波相位最大误差。计算了不同伪距误差下宽巷整周模糊度一周固定错误出现的概率。使用GPS实测短基线数据对算法进行验证,该算法可将基于宽巷引导的整周模糊度固定算法的固定率从原来的只有不到1/3提升至接近100%

References

[1]  He Jun, Liu Wanke, Zhang Xiaohong. Single Epoch Ambiguity Resolution of BDS Triple Frequency Measured Data Under Short Baseline[J]. <em>Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University</em>, 2015, 40(3):361-365(何俊, 刘万科, 张小红. 北斗短基线三频实测数据单历元模糊度固定[J]. 武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2015, 40(3):361-365)
[2]  Kaplan E D, Hegarty C. Understanding GPS:Principles and Applications[M].2nd Edition. USA:Artech House, 2006
[3]  Tang W, Deng C, Shi C, et al. Triple-Frequency Carrier Ambiguity Resolution for Beidou Navigation Satellite System[J]. <em>GPS Solut.</em>, 2014(18):335-344
[4]  Wu Yue. The Theory and Application on Multi-frequency Data Processing of GNSS2[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2005(伍岳. 第二代导航卫星系统多频数据处理理论及应用[D]. 武汉:武汉大学, 2005)
[5]  Xie Gang. Principle of GPS and Receiver Design[M]. Beijing:Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2009(谢刚. GPS原理与接收机设计[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2009)
[6]  Feng Y. GNSS Three Carrier Ambiguity Resolution Using Ionosphere-Reduced Virtual Signals[J]. <em>J Geod,</em> 2008, 82(12):847-862
[7]  Zhu Huizhong, Gao Xingwei, Bei Jinzhong, et al. An Algorithm of GPS Ambiguity Resolution on Single-Epoch[J]. <em>Science of Surveying and Mapping</em>, 2011, 36(4):9-11(祝会忠, 高星伟, 秘金钟,等. 一种GPS整周模糊度单历元解算方法[J]. 测绘科学, 2011, 36(4):9-11)
[8]  Wu Yue, Fu Xiaolin, Li Haijun,et al. Application of TCAR/MCAR Method in Different Baseline Ambiguity Resolution[J]. <em>Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University</em>, 2007, 37(2):172-175(伍岳, 付小林, 李海军, 等. TCAR/MCAR方法在不同距离基线模糊度求解中的应用[J]. 武汉大学学报·信息科学版, 2007, 37(2):172-175)
[9]  Chen D, Lachapelle G. A Comparison of the FASF and Least Squares Search Algorithms for on-the-Fly Ambiguity Resolution[J]. <em>Navigation</em>, 1995(42):371-390
[10]  Li J, Yang Y,Xu J, et al. GNSS Multi-carrier Fast Partial Ambiguity Resolution Strategy Tested with Real BDS/GPS Dual-and Triple-frequency Observations[J]. <em>GPS Solut</em>., 2015(19):5-13
[11]  Xue Zhihong. A Study of Key Technology for Dynamic Deformation Monitoring Using GNSS[D]. Zhengzhou:Information Engineering University, 2012(薛志宏. GNSS动态变形测量关键技术研究[D]. 郑州:信息工程大学,2012)
[12]  Teunissen P J G. The LAMBDA Method for the GNSS Compass[J]. <em>Art Satellites</em>, 2007(41):89-103
[13]  Teunissen P J G. An Optimality Property of the Integer Leastsquares Estimator[J]. <em>J. Geodesy,</em> 1999(73):587-593
[14]  Hatch R. Instantaneous Ambiguity Resolution[C]. Kinematic System in Geodesy, Surveying, and Remote Sensing, KIS Symposium, Banff, Canada, 1990

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133