全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2018 

人参皂苷对金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜形成的影响
Effects of ginsenosides on the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus

DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2018.013

Keywords: 金黄色葡萄球菌,Rh2,生物被膜,协同作用,人参皂苷,
Ginsenosides
,Synergistic effect,Rh2,Staphylococcus aureus,Biofilm

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

References

[1]  Yu D, Zhao L, Xue T, et al. <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>autoinducer-2 quorum sensing decreases biofilm formation in an icaR-dependent manner[J]. BMC Microbiol, 2012, 12: 288. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-288.
[2]  Xu R, Peng Y, Wang M, et al. Effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of ginsenoside Rb1: a study on rats’ gut microflora influenced by lincomycin[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2014,158(Pt A): 338-344.
[3]  Gardner A, Wu W, Thomson S, et al. Molecular basis of altered hERG1 channel gating induced by Ginsenoside Rg3[J]. Mol Pharmacol, 2017, 92(4): 437-450.
[4]  Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Ravaioli S, et al. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in biofilm: structural and regulatory aspects[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2015, 5: 7. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00007.
[5]  Aka ST, Haji SH. Sub-MIC of antibiotic induced biofilm formation of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </i>in the presence of chlorhexidine[J]. Braz J Microbiol, 2015, 46(1): 149-154.
[6]  Hathroubi S, Fontaine-Gosselin Sè, Tremblay YD, et al. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of penicillin G induce biofilm formation by field isolates of <i>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</i>[J]. Vet Microbiol, 2015, 79(3-4): 277-286.
[7]  Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, et al. <i>Staphylococcus</i> aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2015, 28(3): 603-661.
[8]  Bhattacharya M, Wozniak DJ, Stoodley P, et al. Prevention and treatment of <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>biofilms[J]. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2015, 13(12): 1499-516.
[9]  Zhang J, Sun Y, Wang Y, et al. Non-antibiotic agent ginsenoside 20(S)-Rh2 enhanced the antibacterial effects of ciprofloxacin <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> as a potential NorA inhibitor[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2014, 740: 277-284. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.07.020.
[10]  Sherstha L, Kayama S, Sasaki M, et al. Inhibitory effects of antibiofilm compound 1 against <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>biofilms[J]. Microbiol Immunol, 2016, 60(3): 148-159.
[11]  Mirzaee M, Najar-Peerayeh S, Behmanesh M, et al. Relationship between adhesion genes and biofilm formation in vancomycin-intermediate <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>clinical isolates[J]. Curr Microbiol, 2015, 70(5): 665-670.
[12]  Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa </i>lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2017, 7: 39. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039.
[13]  黄月云,夏婷,赵成国,等.人参皂苷Rh2和Rg3抗肿瘤作用研究进展[J].实用中医药杂志, 2016, 32(8): 846-847.
[14]  Lee DG, Jang SI, Kim YR, et al. Anti-proliferative effects of ginsenosides extracted from mountain ginseng on lung cancer[J]. Chin J Integr Med, 2016, 22(5): 344-352.
[15]  Han S, Jeong AJ, Yang H, et al. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rh2 exerts anti-cancer activity through targeting IL-6-induced JAK2/STAT3 pathway in human colorectal cancer cells[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2016, 194: 83-90. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.039.
[16]  Li H, Huang N, Zhu W, et al. Modulation the crosstalk between tumor-associated macrophages and non-small cell lung cancer to inhibit tumor migration and invasion by ginsenoside Rh2[J]. BMC Cancer, 2018, 18(1): 579.
[17]  Tong-Lin Wu T, Tong YC, Chen IH, et al. Induction of apoptosis in prostate cancer by ginsenoside Rh2[J]. Oncotarget, 2018, 9(13): 11109-11118.
[18]  Lee SM. Anti-inflammatory effects of ginsenosides Rg5, Rz1, and Rk1: inhibition of TNF-ɑ-induced NF-κB, COX-2, and iNOS transcriptional expression[J]. Phytother Res, 2014, 28(12): 1893-1896.
[19]  Abdulamir AS, Jassim SA, Hafidh RR, et al. The potential of bacteriophage cocktail in eliminating Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>biofilms in terms of different extracellular matrices expressed by <i>PIA, ciaA-D</i> and <i>FnBPA</i> genes[J]. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 2015, 14: 49. doi:10.1186/S12941-015-0106-0.
[20]  Lister JL, Horswill AR. <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2014, 4: 178. doi:10.3389/fcibm.2014.00178.
[21]  McCarthy H, Rudkin JK, Black NS, et al. Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2015, 5:1. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001.
[22]  Harapanahalli AK, Chen Y, Li J, et al. Influence of adhesion force on icaA and cidA gene expression and production of matrix components in <i>Staphylococcus aureus </i>biofilms[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015, 81(10): 3369-3378.
[23]  Guo P, Lam SL. Unusual structures of TTTA repeats in <i>icaC</i> gene of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>[J]. FEBS Lett, 2015, 589(12): 1296-1300.
[24]  Castelani L, Pilon LE, Martins T, et al. Investigation of biofilm production and <i>icaA</i> and <i>icaD</i> genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from heifers and cows with mastitis[J]. Anim Sci J, 2015, 86(3): 340-344.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133