|
|
- 2017
市场定价约束条件下的供应链质量改进容错决策
|
Abstract:
摘要： 研究了需求不确定条件下具有风险态度的供应链质量改进决策问题,引入了企业风险态度和价值损失函数,建立了供应链质量改进效用函数,分析了市场定价条件下集成供应链与分散供应链的质量改进活动,分别建立了制造商和供应商的效用质量模型并以效用最大化为目标进行优化,得到了不同情形下应对风险的质量改进容错策略。最后,运用Mathematica 5.0软件进行算例仿真,验证了模型的有效性。
Abstract: This paper concerns on the strategies of quality improvementin supply chains with risk attitude when customers demand is uncertain. To achieve this goal, the functions of the enterprise risk attitude and value loss were introduced and the utility functions of quality improvement in supply chains were established. Through this analysis, the activities of quality improvement in integrated and decentralized supply chains with market pricingconstraints can be used as the bases of establishing the utility-quality models for manufacturers and suppliers respectively. These models can help people obtainthe fault tolerance strategies of quality improvement at risk in different situations and maximize the utility. At the last stage of this research, a software named Mathematica 5.0 will be used to test the availability of these models
| [1] | ALTUG M S, RYZIN G. Product quality selection: contractual agreements and supplier competition in an assemble-to-order environment [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 141(2):626-638. |
| [2] | 刘咏梅,李立,刘洪莲. 行为供应链研究综述[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 11(1):80-88. LIU Yongmei, LI Li, LIU Honglian. Behavioral supply chain management review[J]. Journal of Central South University(Social Science Edition), 2011, 11(1):80-88. |
| [3] | 崔崟,陈剑,肖勇波.行为库存管理研究综述及前景展望[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 96-108. CUI Yin, CHEN Jian, XIAO Yongbo. Behavioral inventory management: research overview and prospects[J].Journal of Management Science, 2011, 14(6): 96-108. |
| [4] | LI K J, JAIN S.Behavior-based pricing: an analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness[J]. Management Science, 2016,62(9):2705-2721. |
| [5] | CHUNG H, LEE E. Asymmetric relationships with symmetric suppliers: strategic choice of supply chain price leadership in a competitive market [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 259:564-575. |
| [6] | CHEN J, LIANG L, YAO D Q, et al. Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259:564-575. |
| [7] | TSE Y K, TAN K H. Managing product quality risk and visibility in multi-layer supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139(1):49-57. |
| [8] | TSE Y K, TAN K H. Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49(1):139-158. |
| [9] | XIE G, WANG S Y, LAI K K. Quality improvement in competing supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(1): 262-270. |
| [10] | 刘作仪, 查勇.行为运作管理: 一个正在显现的研究领域[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009, 12(4): 64-74. LIU Zuoyi, CHA Yong. Behavioral operations management: an emerging research field[J].Journal of Management Science, 2009, 12(4):64-74. |
| [11] | PEDERSEN S N, HOWARD T. Data acquisition for quality loss function modelling[J]. Procedia Cirp, 2016, 43:112-117. |
| [12] | XIE G, YUE W Y, WANG S Y. Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(2): 403-410. |
| [13] | GINO F, PISANO G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations [J]. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4): 676-691. |
| [14] | 孟庆峰,盛昭瀚,李真. 基于公平偏好的供应链质量激励机制效率演化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012,32(11): 2394-2403. MENG Qingfeng, SHENG Zhaohan, LI Zhen. Efficiency evolution of quality incentive in supply chain based on fairness preference[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012,32(11): 2394-2403. |
| [15] | BEN AMARA S, DHAHRI J, BEN FREDJ N. Process true capability evaluation with the consideration of measurement system variability and expected quality loss[J]. Quality & Reliability Engineering International, 2016. |
| [16] | ZHANG J, LI W, WANG K, et al. Process adjustment with an asymmetric quality loss function[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 33(1):159-165. |
