|
- 2017
具身认知运动的批判性审思与清理Keywords: 具身认知, 经典认知, 操作性定义, 内部效度embodied cognition, classical cognition, operational definition, internal validity Abstract: 近20 年来,具身认知作为经典认知科学的“叛逆运动”已经取得了令人瞩目的成就,但该运动内部沉淀的大量积弊亟待给予必要的反思与清理。通过分析具身认知的核心概念、理论假设、实验证据与结论,认为具身认知当前亟需直面并解决三个紧密相连的问题:核心概念的界定问题;理论假设的兼容性问题;论证与解释的有效性问题。若想实现认知科学的范式转型,未来的具身认知研究必须坚定对经典认知的替代,排除其他备择解释,接受贝叶斯检验。In the last two decades,studies on embodied cognition,as a rebellious movement against thetraditional cognitive sciences,have made remarkable achievements. Within this movement,however,there are a lot of problems to be sorted out and examined. Through analyzing its core concepts,hypotheses,experimental evidence and results,we identified three closely connected issues facing the school of embodiedcognition. The first issue is about how to define the core concepts concerning embodied cognition. The secondis that to what extent the embodied cognition is compatible with classical cognition in theoretical views. Thethird is that to what extent various arguments and interpretations of embodied cognition are valid. Futureresearches have to handle the challenges above,since it may determine whether or not embodied cognition iseligible to replace the classical cognition as a new paradigm in cognitive sciences
|