强迫倾向、内心体验的信心水平与知道感缺乏的关系

摘要： 为探讨强迫倾向、内心体验的信心水平与知道感缺乏的关系，采用虚假生物反馈为内在状态的外部线索，以指导语操控被试内心体验的信心水平，考察高、低强迫倾向（high/low obsessive-compulsive tendencies, HOC/LOC）组在不同信心水平下依赖外部线索评价内在状态的情况。结果：(1)HOC组的知道感存在缺陷，表现为比LOC组更依赖外部线索评价内在状态；(2)HOC组的知道感缺乏受其信心水平的影响，低信心会加剧HOC组的知道感缺乏。本研究结果能为缓解HOC个体的怀疑及相关强迫症状提供帮助，并或许能为OCD认知和元认知治疗提供思路。
Abstract: The present study aimed to explore the relationship of obsessive-compulsive(OC) tendencies, confidence regarding inner experience and lack of feeling of knowing. We employed a 2(OC tendencies: high vs. low)×2(confidence: undermined vs. controlled) ×2(external proxies: upward phase vs. downward phase) mixed design, in which OC tendencies and confidence as the between-subjects variables, external proxies as the within-subjects variable. Padua Inventory(PI, Chinese version) was used to select 17 high(upper 10%,9 female and 8 male) and 18 low(lower 10%,9 female and 9 male) OC individuals. Then, we used instructions experimentally undermining/controlling confidence in judgments of the target internal state in non-selected participants of two groups. False biofeedback paradigm was used, in which relaxation as the target internal state, and two false pre-programmed biofeedback phases as external proxies for the internal state of relaxation, one of a descending line graph signaling to participants an increase in relaxation, and one of an ascending line graph signaling a decrease in relaxation. The order of the two false pre-programmed biofeedback phases was counterbalanced across participants and within each group. Participants were tested individually in a small and quiet room, we explored their situations of reliance on external proxies for internal states in different confidence conditions. Subjective assessments of relaxation were measured with a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) on which participants were asked to place a mark that best described their relaxation levels during each task. Additionally, we measured their actual autonomic arousal level of galvanic skin response (GSR)and respiration(RSP) rate by a biofeedback apparatus(NeXus-10 Mark II, Mind Media B.V. Netherlands),in order to rule out a real relaxation level differences between the two biofeedback phases. At the end of the experiment, participants were asked to rate how confident they were about their two subjective relaxation estimates, using a scale of 0-100, in order to check whether our manipulation created a significant difference between participants with undermined/controlled confidence regarding their confidence in their estimates of internal states. The results showed that, (1)no matter how