虚拟场景中不同客体朝向条件对内在参照系建立的影响

摘要： 通过眼动记录和部分场景再认两种方法，对虚拟建筑物对称场景中物体朝向统一、凸显两种条件对内在参照系建立的影响进行研究。结果发现：（1）场景中均为有朝向建筑物且朝向统一时，被试选择物体朝向与对称轴建立内在参照系的可能性没有差异；（2）场景中只有一个有朝向建筑物，其余均为无朝向物体时，即朝向凸显条件下，被试倾向于选择对称轴来建立内在参照系。物体朝向对内在参照系建立的影响作用具有局限性和不稳定性。
Abstract: The intrinsic spatial frame of reference system (FoRs) theory suggests that people memorize objects’ locations according to a FoRs based on object-to-object relationships. Li & Zhang (2011) demonstrated that the orientation-coincidence affected the construction of intrinsic FoRs in spatial memory with real symmetric scene applied. However, no significant difference was found in the chances to be the dominant axis of intrinsic FoRs between the symmetric axis and the coincident orientation during the retrieval phase in the aforementioned study. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate participants’ responses to virtual scenes during both the coding and the retrieval phases of memory, under the orientation-coincidence and orientation-predominance conditions respectively. Forty-eight participants took part in this study, and each of them finished one experiment only. Each experiment included a learning phase and a testing phase. In the learning phase, participants studied a virtual symmetric scene consisted of seven objects from a single viewpoint, while their eye movements were recorded using the German SMI iView X Hi-Speed Eye Tracking System (sampling rate=1250Hz, refresh rate=100Hz). Subsequently in the testing phase, participants were required to perform the partial-scene-recognition (PSR) task in which they needed to judge whether the directional relationship in the partial scene was the same as the learned scene. In Experiment 1 (that is orientation-coincidence condition), there were seven virtual buildings that shared the coincident orientation in the learning scene. While in Experiment 2 (that is orientation-predominance condition), a different scene was learned, in which one building with clear orientation was surrounded with six objects with no orientation. In both experiments, the object orientation was set at the direction of 135°. All the participants observed the scenes along the 315° direction. The symmetric axis was set at the axis of 0°-180°. The difference between the observed percentage and the a priori percentage of inter-object eye movements and the response time in PSR task was analyzed using ANOVA. In Experiment 1, for the difference between the observed percentage and the a priori percentage of inter-object eye movements, results showed no significant difference between the coordination