任务难度对自闭症儿童视觉搜索优势显现的影响

摘要： 探究自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童视觉搜索优势的显现是否受任务难度影响及优势存在机理。本研究采集ASD和正常发育(TD)儿童完成不同难度等级视觉搜索任务的行为和眼动数据。结果发现：在高难度等级任务中ASD组的准确率显著高于TD组；ASD组在任务中对目标刺激的回视次数、对靶子和外周感兴趣区的注视时间显著少于TD组，且ASD组偏好注视刺激的右侧区域。结果表明ASD儿童视觉搜索优势显现受任务难度影响，且可能与其对干扰刺激增强的知觉能力有关。
Abstract: It is controversial whether the performance of visual search task in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is better than that in typically developing children (TD) or not. One of the potential reasons is the difficulty levels of visual search task they employed in each study, i.e., adult version vs. child version. Through modulating the difficulty levels with the gap of director degrees between the target stimulus and the distractions during the visual search task, the study aim to 1) test whether the superior visual search performance in ASD could be modulated by the difficulties of visual search tasks; 2) and further study the underlying mechanisms of superior performance in ASD on visual search tasks using eye-movement data analysis if it is. The study adopted a mixed experimental design with two factors: group (ASD/ typically developing children, TD) and difficulty levels of visual search task (9 levels). Eighteen children with ASD (14M/4F) and 16 IQ and chronological age-matched TD (13M/3F) participated in the current study. The participants need to determine whether there was a distraction in the screen, which is just the same as the target stimulus as soon as possible. Among all distractions, there was a main stimulus which had the least differences of director degree compared with the target stimulus. The difficulty levels of visual search task was modulated by the gap of director degree between the target stimulus and the main stimulus (9 levels: 0°、4°、8°、12°、16°、20°、24°、28°、32°) (Figure 1). Participants’ behavioral responses were automatically recorded by the computer, and their eye-movement data were tracked by an eye tracker during the whole experiment. The behavioral responses indices, response accuracy and reaction time, during the task were analyzed by mixed design ANOVA. For eye-movement data, firstly several areas of interest (AOIs) in the stimulus picture were divided: Central AOI where the target stimulus was placed; Main AOI where the main stimulus was placed; Peripheral AOI where other distractions were placed. Then various eye-movement indices including the fixations, durations of fixation and saccade paths, intra and inter-AOI (s) were analyzed respectively between ASD and TD. The study found that only under the task difficulty level of 4° gap between target stimulus and main