混合方法研究的方法论与实践尝试：共识、争议与反思

摘要 混合方法研究是指结合量化研究与质性研究的要素进行的研究，其已经逐步发展为一种独立的方法论。混合方法研究兴起于对范式不兼容的反思与批判，并随后选择了实用主义作为其范式，这奠定了混合方法研究的合法性基础。但是在实际运用中，人们对于为何选择混合方法研究以及如何开展混合方法研究，仍存有误区与困境。国内研究者丞待加强对混合方法研究的评介应用与反思。
Abstract： Mixed methods research (MMR) is a kind of research that combines the elements of both quantitative and qualitative approaches, which not only combines different specific methods but also attempts to integrate theunderlying philosophies and theories. MMR was introduced in the late of 1950s，and became a distinctive methodology with the development of its underlying theoriesand applied processesduring the Paradigm War in the 1980s. Since the 1990s, MMR has developed into a relatively complete methodology as well as a popular research design. Advocates harshly criticize the viewpoint that different paradigms and methodsare notcompatible. They argue that: a) MMR reveals the continuity of paradigmsin that different paradigms do not oppose completely;b) even if different paradigms might beincompatible, specific methods still can be mixed; c) MMR has complementary advantages over quantitative or qualitative research. Thecriticisms provide space for the development of MMR. Moreover, pragmatism, as a widely acceptedparadigm, provides MMR with anunderlying philosophy. However, many researchers question the selection of pragmatism as the paradigm of MMR, as pragmatism seems to be a perfect excuse for researchers to escape reflectingits underlying philosophy. In practice, researchers should first respond to why they choose the design of MMR (DMMR). In particular, they should clarify the process and function of the integration.The integration tends tooccurwhere the qualitative research and the quantitative research joinor when researchers attempt to reach the conclusions from different parts. It can promote the research or mutual attestation, complementation or innovative conclusions. Based on the sequence,and status of the qualitativeand quantitative research as well as the process and function of integration,DMMR can be divided intothree categories: parallel design, quantitative qualitative sequence design, and qualitative quantitative sequence design. Researchers may reorganize the three designs according toparticularresearch questions and research conditions. Currently, researchers still have to face the problems with data collection and analysis, data translation, conclusion integration, and the judgment of inference quality when they choose DMMR. In addition, they should first prove the rationality of the choice of MMR and provide a panoramic research process and