临床学科人才建设关键指标分析
Analysis of key indexes for cultivating talents in clinical disciplines

目的·分析上海某医学院附属医院临床学科人才建设和学科发展水平之间的关系，找出关键指标，并对人才建设提出建议。方法·用问卷调查和权威资料查询的方式，采集学科人才建设和医、教、研数据；根据学科评估指标体系计算出学科发展水平，再按照量化结果将学科分为2类：优势学科（n=33）和一般学科(n=129)；运用秩和检验方法分析各项人才建设指标在2类学科中的差异，有统计学差异的指标为与学科发展水平相关联的关键指标。结果·学科总人数、高级职称人数占比、博士学历人数占比、41~50岁人数占比、学科带头人学术地位、人才聚集度、专职科研队伍人数、人才项目数、派出国外进修培训人次等人才指标在2类学科间存在统计学差异（P<0.05），与学科发展水平呈正相关，为关键指标。结论·应加大学科人才建设力度，注重关键人才建设指标。通过扩大人员规模，改善人才结构，重视50岁以下中青年人才的培养，引进和培养具有较高影响力的学科带头人，提高人才聚集度，增加专职科研人员数量，以及争取更多人才项目和海外人才培训机会等，提高学科发展水平。
： Objective·To analyze the association between talent cultivation and clinical discipline development level for affiliated hospitals of a medical school in Shanghai, determine key indexes, and propose suggestions for talent cultivation. Methods·Questionnaire survey and data search were used to collect the information on talent cultivation, medical care, teaching, and research. Based on the performance evaluation index system, the discipline development level was calculated. According to quantitative results, disciplines were classified into two categories, i.e. superior disciplines (n=33) and ordinary disciplines (n=129). The rank sum test method was used to analyze the differences in talent cultivation indexes between two types of discipline. Indexes with statistical significance were key indexes associated with the discipline development level. Results·Indexes with statistical difference (P<0.05) between two types of disciplines were the number of faculty in one discipline, the proportion of faculty with a senior professional title, the proportion of faculty with a doctoral degree, the proportion of faculty aged between 41 and 50 years, academic status of discipline leaders, talent aggregation level, the number of researchers, the number of talent projects, and the number of faculty who were trained abroad. Conclusion·We should enhance talent cultivation, pay attention to key indexes, increase the number of faculty, improve talent structure, focus on training talents aged less than 50 years, introduce and cultivate discipline leaders with high influence, elevate talent aggregation, increase the number of researchers, and obtain more talent projects and abroad training opportunities, so as to improve the discipline development level