迈向“整体主义”――我国刑事司法证明模式之转型逻辑

面对“印证证明模式”的理论缺陷，亟需替代性的刑事司法证明模式理论出现。“印证证明模式”实质上是一种“以印证为中心的整体主义证明模式”，抑或简称“亚整体主义”，与真正意义上的“整体主义”存有差异。在此基础上，可以从刑事司法证明模式的“经验―规范”、“实体―程序”、“知识―权力”、“认知―行为”等四重作用维度分别切入，探索迈向“整体主义”证明模式的转型进路。作为改革方向的“整体性”至少应当体现证明过程中的整体性和证明模式之作用维度的整体性，而作用维度可以巩固和监控证明过程的实质整体性。这意味着证明过程中的整体性与作用维度的整体性相辅相成、互为因果，均需要体现出从原子分析到整体认知的证明逻辑。
In the face of the theoretical shortcomings of the “corroboration model”, it is urgent to find an alternative theory. China？？s criminal proof model should be defined as “sub-holism”, and it is different from the real “holism”. On this basis, to explore the transition towards “holism”, we can cut into the “holism”from the four dimensions of “experience-norm”, “substance-procedure”, “knowledge-power” and “cognition-behavior”. As the direction of reform, “holism”should at least be reflected in the process of proof and the dimensions of effect. Furthermore, the dimensions of effect can consolidate and monitor the “holism” in the process of proof. It means that “holism” in the process of proof and the dimensions of effect supplements each other, and all need to show the proof logic from atomic analysis to holistic cognition.