Tanzania is participating in the United Nations (UN) climate change mitigation strategy of reduction in Greenhouse Gases (GHGs). The strategy is implemented through both Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) and Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM) initiatives. In implementing programmes, the country developed pilot projects whereby there are preliminary findings that can be used to analyse the progress of the establishments. This study uses the findings from these pilot areas to draw policy implications on how carbon trade in the country can be enhanced to meet the UN set objectives as required by the Kyoto protocol. The findings suggest that for the sustainable carbon trade enhancement the country needs to set the institutional environment for carbon trade right. Such undertakings are not costless and that the transaction costs that would be incurred for the process need to be institutionalised to reduce the private costs in the carbon market. Moreover the policy process should be informed that at the market level there are multiple objectives that should be understood to avoid what is termed as optimization in standard economic theory, instead there should be clear definition of the specific objectives for various stakeholders involved in the carbon trade. Besides, within the carbon market framework not all stakeholders incur the same costs since natural resource transactions involve externalities. These externalities need to be identified and internalised to equally distribute the costs and benefits among the stakeholders.
References
[1]
UN-REDD (United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries) Programme Strategy 2011-2015. International Environment House, Geneva.
[2]
Ahmad, N. and Wyckoff, A. (2003) Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade of Goods. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/15, OECD.
[3]
OECD (2012) OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050. OECD, Netherland.
[4]
Vatn, A. (2005) Institutions and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
[5]
Williamson, O.E. (2000) The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595-613.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595
[6]
North, D.C. (1990) Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
[7]
Hagedorn, K. (2007) Towards an Institutional Theory of Multifunctionality. In: Mander, ü., Helming, K. and Wiggering, H., Eds., Multifunctional Land Use. Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, 105-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36763-5_7
[8]
Mombo, F. and Ngaga, Y. (2013) The Analysis of Carbon Trade Economics and Its Policy Implication to Mitigate Climate Change in Tanzania: New Institutional Economics Perspective. International Conference on Climate Change 2013: Climate Change, Sustainable Intensification and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa, Morogoro, Tanzania, 13-15 November 2013.
[9]
IPCC (2007) Glossary J-P. In (book section): Annex I. In: Metz, B., et al., Eds., Climate Change 2007: Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., and New York, USA.
[10]
Kajembe, G.C., Silayo, D.A., Kitula, M.M., Lyatura, N., Mutabaz, K.J., Massawe, F. and Vatn, A. (2012) REDD+ Realities: Lessons Learned from REDD+ Pilot Projects in Kondoa and Rungwe Districts, Tanzania. Proceedings of the First Climate Change 22 Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation Programme Scientific Conference, Held at Blue Pearl Hotel, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2-3 January 2012.
[11]
Green Resource (2010) Development of Clean Development Mechanism Project in Tanzania; Leason Learnt. Standvein, Norway.
[12]
Grubb, M. (2003) The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol. World Economics, 4, 143-189.
[13]
World Bank (2010) World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington DC.
[14]
Kajembe, G.C., et al. (2017) The REDD+ Process in Tanzania: The Village as an Arena for Defining and Defending Local and National Interests.
[15]
Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (MNRT)/UN-REDD Programme (2012) Capacity Needs Assessment of Government Institutions at Central, Regional, District and Local Levels for the Establishment and Management of a REDD+ Scheme in Tanzania. Final Report, 104 p.
[16]
United Republic of Tanzania (URT, 1995) Environmental Policy 1995. Vice President Office, Dar es Salaam.
[17]
URT (2005) Environmental Management Act, 2005. Vice President Office, Dar es Salaam.
[18]
Kant, P., Chaliha, S. and Wu, S. (2011) REDD Safeguards of Cancun. IGREC Working Paper IGREC 19, Institute of Green Economy, New Delhi.
[19]
Yolanda, K. (2012) Safeguarding the Clean Development Mechanism Will Benefit Southern and Northern Nations Alike.
[20]
Mombo, F., Lusambo, L.P., Speelman, S., Buysse, J., Munishi, P. and Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2014) Scope for Introducing Payments for Ecosystems Services as a Strategy to Reduce Deforestation in the Kilombero Wetlands Catchment Area. Forest Policy and Economics, 38, 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.004
[21]
Zahabu, E., Eid, T., Kajembe, G.C., Mbwambo, L., Mongo, C., Sangeda, A., Malimbwi, R.E., Katani, J.Z., Kashaigili, J. and Luoga, E. (2009) Forestland Tenure Systems in Tanzania: An Overview of Policy Changes in Relation to Forest Management. INA Fragrapport 14, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, 24 p.
[22]
Edella, S. and Elinor, O. (1992) Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68, 249-262.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3146375
[23]
Faraji, N. (2013) Opportunity Costs of REDD+ to the Communities of Mufindi District, Iringa, Tanzania. MSc. Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro.
[24]
Nordhaus, W.D. (1993) Optimal Greenhouse-Gas Reductions and Tax Policy in the Dice Model. The American Economic Review, 83, 313-317.
[25]
Jacob, A., Craig, J. and Fisher, G. (2005) Transportation Cost Analysis: A Case Study of the Total Cost of Private and Public Transport in Auckland. Environmental Science and Policy, 9, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.09.001