A class of pseudodistances is used to derive test statistics using transformed data or
spacings for testing goodness-of-fit for parametric models. These statistics
can be considered as density based statistics and expressible as simple
functions of spacings. It is known that when the null hypothesis is simple,the
statistics follow asymptotic normal distributions without unknown parameters.
In this paper we emphasize results for the null composite hypothesis: the
parameters can be estimated by a generalized spacing method (GSP) first which
is equivalent to minimize a pseudodistance
from the class which is considered; subsequently the estimated parameters are
used to replace the parameters in the pseudodistance
used for estimation; goodness-of-fit statistics for the composite hypothesis can be
constructed and shown to have again an asymptotic normal distribution without
unknown parameters.Since these statistics are related to a discrepancy measure, these tests
can be shown to be consistent in general. Furthermore, due to the simplicity of
these statistics and
References
[1]
Ghosh, K. and Jammalamadaka, S.R. (2001) A General Estimation Method Using Spacings. Journal of Statistical Planning Inference, 93, 71-82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00160-9
[2]
Luong, A. (2018) Unified Asymptotic Results for Maximum Spacing and Generalized Spacing Method for Continuous Model. Open Journal of Statistics, 8, 614-639.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2018.83040
[3]
Cheng, R.C.H. and Stephens, M.A. (1989) A Goodness-of-Fit Test Using Moran’s Statistic with Estimated Parameters. Biometrika, 76, 385-392.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/76.2.385
[4]
Anderson, T.W. and Darling, D.A. (1954) A Test of Goodness of Fit. Journal of American Statistical Association, 49, 765-769.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
[5]
Boos, D. (1982) Minimum Anderson Darling Estimation. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 11, 2747-2774.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928208828420
[6]
Stephens, M.A. (1986) Tests Based on EDF Statistics in Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. d’Agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A., Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York.
[7]
Greenwood, P.E. and Nikulin, S.M. (1996) A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing. Wiley, New York.
[8]
Sethuraman and Rao, J.S. (1970) Pitman Efficiencies of Tests Based on Spacings in Nonparametric Techniques in Statistical Inference. Puri, M.L., Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[9]
Zhang, J. (2002) Powerful Goodness-of-Fit Tests Based on the Likelihood Ratio. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62, 281-294.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00337
[10]
Kale, B.K. (1969) Unified Derivation of Tests of Goodness of Fit Based on Spacings. Sankhya, Series A, 31, 43-48.
[11]
Beran, R. (1977) Minimum Hellinger Distance Estimates for Parametric Models. Annals of Statistics, 5, 445-463. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176343842
[12]
Pollard, D. (1980) The Minimum Distance Method of Testing. Metrika, 27, 43-70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893576
[13]
Ali, S.M. and Silvey, S.D. (1966) A Generalized Class of Coefficients of Divergence of One Distribution from Another. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 28, 813-828.
[14]
Pardo, L. (2006) Statistical Inference Based on Divergence Measures. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton.
[15]
Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (2012) Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. 4th Edition, Wiley, New York.
[16]
Kirmani, S.N.U.A. and Alam, S.N. (1974) On Goodness of Fit Tests Based on Spacings. Sankhya, Series A, 36,197-203.
[17]
Kirmani, S.N.U.A. (1973) On a Goodness of Fit Test Based on Matusita’s Distance. Annals of the Institue of Mathematical Statistics, 24, 493-500.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479394
[18]
Carrasco, M. and Florens, J.-P. (2000) Generalization of GMM to a Continuum of Moment Conditions. Econometric Theory, 16, 797-834.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600166010
[19]
Lehmann, E.L. (1999) Elements of Large Sample Theory. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/b98855