We control the investor and investment-specific
factors to test how macro factors affect the exit of venture capital. After
using a sample of 28668 VC investments in China, we discover that macro factors
such as legal rights and GDP growth have a positive impact on successful exit,
which means that macro factors can increase the likelihood of successful exit.
Surprisingly, market liquidity which is one kind of macro factors can
significantly reduce the likelihood of trade sale, which is different from our
predictions. In addition, we find that the VC-backed firms with more amount
investment and bigger syndicate size will have more opportunities to IPO, but
the VC investors with more experience will decrease the likelihood of trade
sale and liquidation.
References
[1]
Bertoni, F. and Groh, A.P. (2014) Cross-Border Investments and Venture Capital Exits in Europe. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22, 84–99.
https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12056
[2]
Nahata, R., Hazarika, S. and Tandon, K. (2014) Success in Global Venture Capital Investing: Do Institutional and Cultural Differences Matter? Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 49, 1039-1070. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109014000568
[3]
Espenlaub, S., Khurshed, A. and Mohamed, A. (2015) Venture Capital Exits in Domestic and Cross-Border Investments. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53, 215-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.11.014
[4]
Wang, L. and Wang, S. (2012) Economic Freedom and Cross-Border Venture Capital Performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 19, 26-50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.10.002
[5]
Cumming, D., Fleming, G. and Schwienbacher, A. (2006) Legality and Venture Capital Exits. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 214-245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.12.004
[6]
Cumming, D. and Johan, S.A.B. (2008) Preplanned Exit Strategies in Venture Capital. European Economic Review, 52, 1209-1241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.01.001
[7]
Cumming, D., Schmidt, D. and Walz, U. (2010) Legality and Venture Capital Governance around the World. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 54-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.07.001
[8]
Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (2001) The Venture Capital Revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.145
[9]
Black, B.S. and Gilson, R.J. (1998) Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks versus Stock Markets 1. Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 243-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00045-7
[10]
Dai, N., Jo, H. and Kassicieh, S. (2012) Cross-Border Venture Capital Investments in Asia: Selection and Exit Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 666-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.004
[11]
Guo, B., Lou, Y. and Pérez-Castrillo, D. (2015) Investment, Duration, and Exit Strategies for Corporate and Independent Venture Capital-Backed Start-Ups. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24, 415–455.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12097
[12]
Ozmel, U., Reuer, J.J. and Gulati, R. (2013) Signals across Multiple Networks: How venture Capital and Alliance Networks Affect Interorganizational Collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 852-866.
https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0549
[13]
Ozmel, U., Robinson, D.T. and Stuart, T.E. (2013) Strategic Alliances, Venture Capital, and Exit Decisions in Early Stage High-Tech Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 107, 655-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.09.009
[14]
Bacon-Gerasymenko, V., Coff, R. and Durand, R. (2016) Taking a Second Look in a Warped Crystal Ball: Explaining the Accuracy of Revised Forecasts. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 1292-1319. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12207
[15]
Fine, J.P. and Gray, R.J. (1999) A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 94, 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144
[16]
Li, Y. and Zahra, S.A. (2012) Formal Institutions, Culture, and Venture Capital Activity: A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 95-111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.06.003