This article aims to analyze the effects of the
regulatory quality on fiscal pro-cyclicality in CAEMC member countries based on
the annual panel data for the years 1996 to 2016. To achieve that, we used, on
the one hand, the fiscal policy reaction function (Taylor, 2000) as well as
institutional quality, and on the other hand, the system-generalized method of
moments (system GMM) to empirically understand the effects of the regulatory
quality on fiscal pro-cyclicality in CAEMC member countries. Our findings show
that the current state of regulatory quality in CAEMC countries promotes the
pro-cyclicality of the fiscal policy in this sub-region. In addition, these
findings show that the effect of the current state of regulatory quality on
fiscal pro-cyclicality is more significant when the regulatory quality is
linked to the economic cycle. It is therefore necessary to bring about profound
institutional reform in the CAEMC countries in order to redirect the fiscal
budget towards counter-cyclicality.
References
[1]
Doryn, W., Mackiewicz, M. and Wawrzyniak, D. (2018) The Role of Institutions in Determining the Cyclical Behavior of Fiscal Policy. Lodz Economics, Working Papers No. 2/2018, 28 p.
[2]
Keynes, J.M. (1936) Théorie générale de l‘emploi, de l‘intérêt et de la monnaie. Paris, Payot, 2017 (1re éd. 1936), 493 p.
[3]
Mankiw, N.G. and Weinzierl, M. (2011) Une exploration de la politique de stabilization optimale. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Printemps, 209-272.
https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2011.0003
[4]
Bobbo, A. (2016) Régime de change et cyclicité budgétaire dans les pays africains. Revue d’Analyse économique, 92, 515-544. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040000ar
[5]
Calderon, C., Duncan, R. and Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2012) Do Good Institutions Promote Counter-Cyclical Macroeconomic Policies. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas—Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute, Working Paper No. 118, 29 p.
[6]
Talvi, E. and Végh, C. (2005) Tax Base Variability and Procyclical Fiscal Policy in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, No. 78, 156-190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002
[7]
Guillaumont, J., Tapsoba, S. and Sylviane (2009) Pro cyclicité de la politique budgétaire et surveillance multilatérale dans les unions monétaires africaines. Working Papers n 200904 from CERDI, 49 p.
[8]
Mondiale, B. (2017) Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2017: La gouvernance et la loi. Banque mondiale, Washington DC, 78 p.
[9]
Frankel, N., Vegh, C. and Vuletin, G. (2011) On Graduation from Fiscal Pro-Cyclicality. NBER, Working Paper 17619, 35 p.
[10]
Itchoko, M.M.M.N. (2017) Institutions and Pro-Cyclicality of Fiscal Policy in Sub Saharan Africa. Economics Bulletin, 37, 1365-1380.
[11]
FMI (2017) Rapport des services du FMI sur les politiques communes à l’appui des programmes de réforme des pays members CEMAC (2017). Rapport définitif de surveillance multilatérale 2016 et perspectives, 78 p.
[12]
Delong, J.B. and Summers, H.L. (2012) Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 44, 233-297.
https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2012.0000
[13]
Blanchard, O., Cerutti, E. and Summers, L. (2015) Inflation and Activity-Two Explorations and their Monetary Policy Implications. FMI, Working Paper, 29 p.
[14]
Creel, J., Ducoudré, B., Mathieu, C. and Sterdyniak, H. (2005) Doit-on oublier la politique budgétaire? Une analyse critique de la nouvelle théorie anti-keynésienne des finances publiques. Revue de l’OFCE, No. 92, 43-97.
https://doi.org/10.3917/reof.092.0043
[15]
Buchanan, J.M. and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7687
[16]
Barro, R.J. (1974) Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1095-1118. https://doi.org/10.1086/260266
[17]
Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1977) Rules Rather than Discretion: The Time Inconsistency of Optimal Plans. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 473-492.
https://doi.org/10.1086/260580
[18]
Frankel, J.A., Vegh, C.A. and Vuletin, G. (2013) On Graduation from Fiscal Procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 100, 32-47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.001
[19]
Adigozalov, S. and Rahimov, V. (2015) Institutional Quality, Cyclicality of Macroeconomic Policies and the Effects of Macroeconomic Shocks: Evidence from Transition Economies. Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies International Economics Department, Working Paper, Series HEIDWP0023-2015, 25 p.
[20]
Calderón, H. and Nguyen, C. (2016) The Cyclical Nature of Fiscal Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies, 25, 548-579.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejw007
[21]
Calderon, C., Duncan, R. and Klaus, S. (2004) Institutions and Cyclical Properties of Macroeconomic Policies. Central Bank of Chile, Working Paper 285, 28 p.
Wyplosz, C. (2002) Fiscal Policy: Institutions versus Rules. CEPR Discussion Papers 3238, CEPR Discussion Papers, 40 p.
[24]
Gali, J. and Perrotti, R. (2003) Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe. NBER Working Paper, No. 9773, 45 p.
[25]
Cimadomo, J. (2005) Le pacte de stabilité a-t-il renforce la pro cyclicité de la politique budgétaire. La lettre du CEPII (Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales), No. 247, 4 p.
[26]
Adedeji, O. and Williams, O.H. (2007) Fiscal Reaction Functions in the CFA Zone: An Analytical Perspective. IMF Working Papers 07/232, International Monetary Fund, 21 p.
[27]
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some Test of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
[28]
Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
[29]
Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D
[30]
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues (September 2010). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5430, 31 p.