全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An Assessment Capability for LNG Leaks in Complex Environments

DOI: 10.4236/gep.2018.66005, PP. 65-77

Keywords: All Hazards Planner, Atmospheric Gas Dispersion, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Urban Canopy Flow, Emergency Response, Geohazards, Health and Safety, Environmental Impact

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Pollutants may be introduced into urban or marine settings by various means and could result in an adverse impact to public safety and the environment. Therefore, it is important for emergency management personnel to understand the potential risks and physical extents of a leaked substance, whether it is toxic, flammable or explosive. Traditional tools for predicting the atmospheric dispersion of leaked substances are quick and simple to use, but may not adequately consider the effects of the built environment that includes complex urban and terrain geometries. Alternatively, CFD methods have been increasing in application; although, their superior accuracy is met with commensurate manual effort. The All Hazards Planner is a fast, accurate gas dispersion modelling tool for city and port environments, which employs a full-physics CFD approach but automates the intensive manual effort. In this work, a credible LNG leak from a 12-mm-diameter hole is modelled for two hypothetical case studies: adjacent to an LNG tanker and between a cruise ship and pier during bunkering. The LNG vapour flammability extents are compared to an empirical model in the absence of geometry effects and are contrasted with geometry effects to highlight the importance of the real environment. The free-field extents are invariant, whereas the inclusion of geometry is shown to reduce the flammability extents by spreading at the ground-level and forcing the plume upwards.

References

[1]  Stern, A.C. (1976) Air Pollution, Vol. III: Measuring, Monitoring, and Surveillance of Air Pollution. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, New York.
[2]  Pasquill, F. and Smith, F. (1983) Atmospheric Diffusion. Horwood, Chichester.
[3]  Carruthers, D.J., Holroyd, R.J., Hunt, J.C.R., Weng, W.S., Robins, A.G., Apsley, D.D., et al. (1994) UK-ADMS: A New Approach to Modelling Dispersion in the Earth’s Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, Elsevier, 52, 139-153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(94)90044-2
[4]  Robins, A., Carruthers, D. and McHugh, C. (1997) The ADMS Building Effects Module. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Inderscience Publishers, 8, 708-717.
[5]  Tominaga, Y. and Stathopoulos, T. (2013) CFD Simulation of Near-Field Pollutant Dispersion in the Urban Environment: A Review of Current Modeling Techniques. Atmospheric Environment, Elsevier, 79, 716-730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.028
[6]  Labovsky, J. and Jelemensky, L. (2013) CFD-Based Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling in Real Urban Environments. Chemical Papers, Springer. 67, 1495-1503.
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-013-0388-7
[7]  Flaherty, J.E., Lamb, B., Allwine, K.J. and Allwine, E. (2007) Vertical Tracer Concentration Profiles Measured during the Joint Urban 2003 Dispersion Study. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46, 2019-2037.
https://doi.org/10.1175/2006JAMC1305.1
[8]  Ryan, S.D. and Ripley, R.C. (2018) A Geometric Multigrid Method with Immersed Boundaries for Simulating Atmospheric Dispersion in Complex Urban Environments. Accepted for the Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering.
[9]  Ferziger, J.H. and Perić, M. (2002) Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2
[10]  Launder, B.E. and Spalding, D.B. (1972) Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence. Academic Press, London-New York.
[11]  Grotjans, H. and Menter, F. (1998) Wall Functions for General Application CFD Codes. Proceedings of the 4th European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1112-1117.
[12]  Schlichting, H. (1987) Boundary-Layer Theory. 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[13]  National Resources Canada (2015) Free Data - Geogratis.
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geography/topographic-information/free-data-geogratis/11042
[14]  City of Vancouver (2015) Open Data Catalogue.
http://vancouver.ca/your-government/open-data-catalogue.aspx
[15]  Stoffen, G. (2005) Guideline for Quantitative Risk Assessment “Purple Book” CPR 18E. Publication Series on Dangerous Substances, Volume 3. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, Netherlands.
[16]  Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Metrics for Vancouver.
https://vancouver.weatherstats.ca/metrics
[17]  Ivings, M.J., Jagger, S.F., Lea, C.J. and Webber, D.M. (2007) Evaluating Vapor Dispersion Models for Safety Analysis of LNG Facilities. The Fire Protection Research Foundation, USA.
[18]  Hanna, S.R., Hansen, O.R. and Dharmavaram, S. (2004) FLACS CFD Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU Observations. Atmospheric Environment, Elsevier, 38, 4675-4687.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.05.041

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133