Cosmologies are developed by physicists and
philosophers to explain our experiences of the evolving cosmos. Intelligent
deep-learning metaheuristics provide original frameworks for cosmologies which
are founded on quantum information. Mathematical standard models of physical
cosmology and particle physics formalize an abundance of observations, yet
there is no scientific consensus about how these models include our conscious
experiences and fundamental philosophiesofinformation. Furthermore, Naturalness in physics is coupled to the
related problem of fine-tuning. To address these foundational problems, within
the quantum information paradigm,whilst aligning with
standard scientific models, I introduce a topological deep-learning cosmology
metaheuristic. Braided, 3-coloured, world-strands are proposed to be the
fundamental quantum information tracts (ethereal fibre bundles) of our evolving
Triuniverse. This Braided Loop Metaheuristic comprises eternally evolving
deep-learning feedback loops of superposed, braided, 3-coloured, quantum
information world-strands, which process (in 3-level qutrit states)
foundational properties coined Algebrus (labelled red), Algorithmus (labelled
green) and Geometrus (labelled blue). Braids split from 1→2→3 (in knot
representation respectively: closed loop→trefoilknot→Borromean loops) thence combine from 3→2→1 to form eternally
evolving deep-learning loops. This cosmology metaheuristic simultaneously
incorporates initial Laws of Form; Emergentism (from substrate Mathematics,
through Quantum Physics to Life); Consciousness (as a superposed triunity of
Implicate Order, Process Philosophy and Aesthetic Relationalism); Reductionism
(from Life, through Quantum Physics to Pure Mathematics expressed as Logical
Axioms, Laws of Parsimony and Ideal Form); and the Braided Loop Metaheuristic
reboots its eternal cycle with the initial Laws of Form.An agent’spersonal anthropic Braided
Loop Metaheuristic
References
[1]
Jones, V.F.R. (1985) A Polynomial Invariant for Knots via von Neumann Algebras. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 12, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1985-15304-2
[2]
Witten, E. (1989) Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 121, 351-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01217730
[3]
Aharonov, D., Jones, V. and Landau, Z. (2008) A Polynomial Quantum Algorithm for Approximating the Jones Polynomial. Algorithmica, 55, 395-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-008-9168-0
[4]
McCoss, A. (2016) Quantum Deep Learning Triuniverse. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 6, 223-248. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2016.64015
[5]
McCoss, A. (2017) Agency of Life, Entropic Gravity and Phenomena Attributed to Dark Matter. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 7, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2017.72007
[6]
McCoss, A. (2017) Lithium Quantum Consciousness. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 7, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.4236/jqis.2017.74010
[7]
Spencer Brown, G. (1969) Laws of Form. Allen & Unwin, London.
[8]
Amoroso, R.L., Kauffman, L.H. and Rowlands, P. (2013) The Physics of Reality: Space, Time, Matter: Laws of Forms, Majorana Fermions, and Discrete Physics, Cosmos.
[9]
Griffiths, R.B. (2007) Types of Quantum Information. Physical Review A, 76, Article ID: 062320. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.062320
[10]
Garcia-Morales, V. (2015) Quantum Mechanics and the Principle of Least Radix Economy. Foundations of Physics, 45, 295-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-015-9865-x
[11]
Verlinde, E. (2011) On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton. Journal of High Energy Physics, 4, 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)029
[12]
Cao, C., Carroll, S.M. and Michalakis, S. (2017) Space from Hilbert Space: Recovering Geometry from Bulk Entanglement. Physical Review D, 95, Article ID: 024031. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.024031
[13]
Fitzi, M., Gisin, N. and Maurer, U. (2001) Quantum Solution to the Byzantine Agreement Problem. Physical Review Letters, 87, Article ID: 217901.
[14]
Gedik, Z., Silva, I.A., Cakmak, B., Karpat, G., Vidoto, E.L.G., Soares-Pinto, D.D.O. and Fanchini, F.F. (2015) Computational Speed-Up with a Single Qudit. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 14671. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14671
[15]
Barbour, J.B. and Pfister, H. (1995) Mach’s Principle: From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity. Einstein Studies Volume 6, Birkhauser, Boston.
[16]
Levin, M.A. and Wen, X.-G. (2005) String-Net Condensation: A Physical Mechanism for Topological Phases. Physical Review B, 71, Article ID: 045110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045110
[17]
Price, H. (2012) Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retrocausality? How the Quantum World Says “Maybe”? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2011.12.003
[18]
Leifer, M.S. and Pusey, M.F. (2017) Is a Time Symmetric Interpretation of Quantum Theory Possible without Retrocausality? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 473, Article ID: 20160607. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0607
[19]
Adlam, E. (2018) Spooky Action at a Temporal Distance. Entropy, 20, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/e20010041
[20]
Joos, E., Zeh, H.D., Kiefer, C., Giulini, D.J., Kupsch, J. and Stamatescu, I.O. (2013) Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg.
[21]
Watson, R.A. and Szathmáry, E. (2016) How Can Evolution Learn? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31, 147-157.
[22]
Sternberg, R.J. (1985) Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[23]
Hiley, B.J. (1996) Mind and Matter: Aspects of the Implicate Order Described through Algebra. In: Pribram, K.H. and King, J., Eds., Learning as Self-Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 569-586.
[24]
Frescura, F.A.M. and Hiley, B.J. (1980) The Algebraization of Quantum Mechanics and the Implicate Order. Foundations of Physics, 10, 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00708417
[25]
Schrodinger, E. (1926) An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and Molecules. Physical Review, 28, 1049-1070.
[26]
Whitehead, A.N. (1929) Process and Reality. MacMillan, New York.
Brading, K. and Castellani, E. (2003) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[29]
Atiyah, M., Dunajski, M. and Mason, L.J. (2017) Twistor Theory at Fifty: From Contour Integrals to Twistor Strings. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, 473, Article ID: 20170530.
[30]
Penrose, R. (1994) Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[31]
Arkani-Hamed, N., Cohen, T., D’Agnolo, R.T., Hook, A., Do Kim, H. and Pinner, D. (2016) Solving the Hierarchy Problem at Reheating with a Large Number of Degrees of Freedom. Physical Review Letters, 117, Article ID: 251801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251801