全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Bioinformatic Survey of S-Layer Proteins in Bifidobacteria

DOI: 10.4236/cmb.2018.82003, PP. 68-79

Keywords: Bifidobacteria, S-layer Domain Protein, Phylogeny, Homology Modeling, Domain

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Surface layer (S-layer) proteins are one of the most commonly observed cell envelope components in both Archaea and Bacteria. It has versatile functions and holds considerable application potential in biotechnology. Bifidobacteria are representative probiotics conferring health promoting properties. However, there is little study of S-layer in bifidobacteria yet. The distribution and characteristics of S-layer in bifidobacteria are unknown. In this study, search for S-layer protein in the identical protein groups in NCBI yielded 49 hits belonging to bifidobacteria. These proteins were annotated as either “S-layer (domain) protein” or “putative S-layer (y) domain protein” that distributed among 26 species of Bifidobacterium genus. Multiple alignments suggest S-layer proteins are relatively conservative. Phylogenetic analysis of 24 S-layer (domain) protein sequences groups them into three distinct clusters, with the majority species in Cluster-2. S-layer (domain) protein has a universe motif DUF4381, though its function is unknown. Meanwhile, two other motifs CARDB and EphA2_TM involved in cell adhesion and cell signaling respectively, presented in most S-layer (domain) protein in bifidobacteria. All S-layer proteins have a typical N-terminal Sec-dependent signal peptide and a C-terminal trans-membrane region. Homological modeling of representative S-layer proteins from each cluster revealed a few unique structural features. All representative S-layer proteins have a plenty of β-meander motif that exclusively composed by β-barrel structural architectures linked together by hairpin loops.

References

[1]  Sleytr, U.B., Schuster, B., Egelseer, E.M., et al. (2014) S-Layers: Principles and Applications. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 38, 823-864.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12063
[2]  Pum, D. and Sleytr, U.B. (2014) Reassembly of S-Layer Proteins. Nanotechnology, 25, 312001.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/31/312001
[3]  Ladenhauf, E.M., Pum, D., Wastl, D.S., et al. (2015) S-Layer Based Biomolecular Imprinting. RSC Advances, 5, 83558-83564.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA14971A
[4]  Messner, P. (2010) Occurrence, Structure, Chemistry, Genetics, Morphogenesis, and Function of S-Layers. Prokaryotic Cell Wall Compounds-Structure and Biochemistry, Chapter 2, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 53-109.
[5]  Messner, P., Schaaffer, C. and Kosma, P. (2013) Bacterialcell-Envelope Glycoconjugates. Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 69, 209-272.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-408093-5.00006-X
[6]  Kern, J., Wilton, R., Zhang, R., et al. (2011) Structure of Surface Layer Homology (slh) Domains from Bacillus Anthracis Surface Array Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 26042-26049.
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.248070
[7]  Johnson, B.R., Hymes, J., Sanozky-Dawes, R., et al. (2016) Conserved S-Layer-Associated Proteins Revealed by Exoproteomic Survey of S-Layer-Forming Lactobacilli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82, 134-145.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01968-15
[8]  Marchler-Bauer, A., Bo, Y., Han, L., et al. (2017) Cdd/Sparcle: Functional Classification of Proteins via Subfamily Domain Architectures. Nucleic Acids Research, 45, D200-D203.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1129
[9]  Sun, Z., Baur, A., Zhurina, D., et al. (2012) Accessing the Inaccessible: Molecular Tools for Bifidobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78, 5035-5042.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00551-12
[10]  Hynonen, U. and Palva, A. (2013) Lactobacillus Surface Layer Proteins: Structure, Function and Applications. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 97, 5225-5243.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4962-2
[11]  Boratyn, G.M., Schaffer, A.A., Agarwala, R., et al. (2012) Domain Enhanced Lookup Time Accelerated Blast. Biology Direct, 7, 12.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-12
[12]  Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404
[13]  Sun, Z., Liu, K., Zhang, J., et al. (2017) IAA Producing Bacillus altitudinis Alleviates Iron Stress in Triticum aestivum L. Seedling by Both Bioleaching of Iron and Up-Regulation of Genes Encoding Ferritins. Plant & Soil, 419, 1-11.
[14]  Finn, R.D., Bateman, A., Clements, J., et al. (2014) Pfam: The Protein Families Database. Nucleic Acids Research, 42, D222-D230.
[15]  Petersen, T.N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., et al. (2011) SignalP 4.0: Discriminating Signal Peptides from Transmembrane Regions. Nature Methods, 8, 785-786.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701
[16]  Rose, R.W., Brüser, T., Kissinger, J.C., et al. (2002) Adaptation of Protein Secretion to Extremely High-Salt Conditions by Extensive Use of the Twin-Arginine Translocation Pathway. Molecular Microbiology, 45, 943-950.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03090.x
[17]  Kallberg, M., Wang, H., Wang, S., et al. (2012) Template-Based Protein Structure Modeling Using the RaptorX Web Server. Nature Protocols, 7, 1511-1522.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.085
[18]  Yu, N.Y., Wagner, J.R., Laird, M.R., et al. (2010) PSORTb 3.0: Improved Protein Subcellular Localization Prediction with Refined Localization Subcategories and Predictive Capabilities for All Prokaryotes, Bioinformatics, 26, 1608-1615.
[19]  Mello, L.V., Chen, X. and Rigden, D.J. (2010) Mining Metagenomic Data for Novel Domains: Bacon, a New Carbohydrate-Binding Module. FEBS Letters, 584, 2421-2426.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.04.045
[20]  Kullander, K. and Klein, R. (2002) Mechanisms and Functions of Eph and Ephrin Signaling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 3, 475-486.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm856
[21]  Auernik, K.S., Cooper, C.R. and Kelly, R.M. (2008) Life in Hot Acid: Pathway Analyses in Extremely Thermoacidophilic Archaea. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 19, 445-453.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.08.001

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133