Objectives: Early detection and treatment provide the opportunity to decrease the mortality rate from breast cancer. Quasi-monochromatic technique can enhance low contrast lesion detection by eliminating beam-hardening artifacts. We hypothesized that this technique would be feasible and can be used to assist in breast cancer early detection. Methods: The performance of stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with quasi-monochromatic X-ray sources was evaluated using both simulated and physical phantoms. Normalized spectra in the fraction of total photons vs. photon energy were generated. Results: As expected, the peaked energies from sources, from smallest to largest, are Mo/Mo, W/Ag-1000, and W/Ce-10, W/Ce-100. For contrast vs. noise standard deviation on the simulated CIRS phantom, W/Ce-100 and W/Ce-10 have similar performance on both low and high contrast objects. For low contrast object, W/Ce-100 is barely noticeably better than W/Ce-10, and they are better than both W/Ag-1000 and Mo/Mo. For high contrast objects W/Ce-10 is slightly better than W/Ce-100. The spectra of the implemented W/Ce-10 X-ray source were measured, which matched the simulation well. The contrast noise ratios of reconstructed objects in American College of Radiology mammographic phantom with and without using W/Ce-10 combination are 7.1 and 5.4, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of stationary digital breast tomosynthesis and quasi-monochromatic technique can compensate the loss of X-ray flux due to heavy K-edge filtering. This technique can enable the stationary DBT scanners to operate at acceptable scanning times with better low contrast lesion detectability. Advances in Knowledge: The stationary digital breast tomosynthesis can provide high quality images within short scanning time by using X-ray source array, which makes quasi-monochromatic technique feasible.
References
[1]
Wu, T., et al. (2003) Tomographic Mammography Using a Limited Number of Low-Dose Cone-Beam Projection Images. Medical Physics, 30, 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1543934
[2]
Chen, Y., Lo, J.Y. and Dobbins, J.T. (2005) Impulse Response Analysis for Several Digital Tomosynthesis Mammography Reconstruction Algorithms. Proceedings of SPIE, 5745, 541-549. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.595684
[3]
Bissonnette, M., et al. (2005) Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using an Amorphous Selenium Flat Panel Detector. Proceedings of SPIE, 5745, 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.601622
[4]
Kopans, D.B. (1997) Breast Imaging. 2th Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, New York.
[5]
Schardt, P., et al. (2004) New X-Ray Tube Performance in Computed Tomography by Introducing the Rotating Envelope Tube Technology. Medical Physics, 31, 2699-2706. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1783552
[6]
Zhang, J., et al. (2005) A Stationary Scanning X-Ray Source Based on Carbon Nanotube Field Emitters. Applied Physics Letters, 86, Article ID: 184104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1923750
[7]
Zhou, O., Lu, J.P. and Qiu, Q. (2005) Large-Area Individually Addressable Multi-Beam X-Ray System and Method of Forming Same. US Patent No. 6876724.
[8]
Good, W., et al. (2008) Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Pilot Observer Study. American Journal of Roentgenology, 190, 865-869.
[9]
Ren, B., et al. (2005) Design and Performance of the Prototype Full Field Breast Tomosynthesis System with Selenium Based Flat Panel Detector. Proceedings of SPIE, 5745, 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.595833
[10]
Qian, X., et al. (2009) Design and Characterization of a Spatially Distributed Multibeam Field Emission X-Ray Source for Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Medical Physics, 36, 11. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3213520
[11]
Qian, X., Lu, J.P. and Zhou, O. (2012) High Resolution Stationary Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Using Distributed Carbon Nanotube X-Ray Source Array. Medical Physics, 39, 2090-2099. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3694667
[12]
Stevens, G.M., et al. (2003) Circular Tomosynthesis: Potential in Imaging of Breast and Upper Cervical Spine—Preliminary Phantom and in vitro Study. Radiology, 228, 569-575. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2282020295
[13]
Suryanarayanan, S., et al. (2000) Comparison of Tomosynthesis Methods Used with Digital Mammography. Academic Radiology, 7, 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80061-6
[14]
Baptist, R. (2001) X-Ray Tube Comprising an Electron Source with Microtips and Magnetic Guiding Means. US Patent No. US6259765B1.
[15]
Whitlock, R.R., et al. (2001) Transmission Cathodes for X-Ray Production. US Patent No. US6333968B1.
[16]
Mckinley, R.L., et al. (2004) Simulation Study of a Quasi-Monochromatic Beam for X-Ray Computed Mammotomography. Medical Physics, 31, 800. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1668371
[17]
Crotty, D.J., McKinley, R.L. and Tornai, M.P. (2007) Experimental Spectral Measurements of Heavy K-Edge Filtered Beams for X-Ray Computed Mammotomography. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 52, 603. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/3/005
