全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Perceptions of the Role Played by Aquaculture and the Services It Provides for Territories: Complementarity of Survey Types

DOI: 10.4236/oje.2018.84017, PP. 270-285

Keywords: Ecosystem Services, Ponds, Fish Farming, Questionnaire Design, France, Brazil

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This article discusses the perception of ecosystem services for French and Brazilian pond fish farming. Its aim is to study the extent to which the industry and its stakeholders are aware of the existence of such services in order to be able to prioritize them with respect to social well-being. This identification phase is seldom discussed. It requires that survey questionnaires be designed so as to improve understanding of these perceptions. The surveys undertaken combined both open questions where the interviewees expressed their perceptions spontaneously and closed questions where they were invited to rank a pre-established list of the relevant services. These surveys involved 133 fish farmers and 93 stakeholders. The results show that perceptions differ by question type, and confirm the significance of the questionnaire design and the importance of combining several kinds of approach.

References

[1]  Assessment, M.E. (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
[2]  Ring, I., et al. (2010) Challenges in Framing the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The TEEB Initiative. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 15-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005
[3]  Lewan, L. and Söderqvist, T. (2002) Knowledge and Recognition of Ecosystem Services among the General Public in a Drainage Basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecological Economics, 42, 459-467.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00127-1
[4]  Beaumont, N., et al. (2007) Identification, Definition and Quantification of Goods and Services Provided by Marine Biodiversity: Implications for the Ecosystem Approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54, 253-265.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.003
[5]  Balmford, A., et al. (2002) Economic Reasons for Conserving wild Nature. Science, 297, 950-995.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073947
[6]  Dominati, E., Patterson, M. and Mackay, A. (2010) A Framework for Classifying and Quantifying the Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services of Soils. Ecological Economics, 69, 1858-1868.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
[7]  Zhang, X. and Lu, X. (2010) Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Ecosystem Services for the Ruoergai Plateau Marshes in Southwest China. Ecological Economics, 69, 1463-1470.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.017
[8]  Cocklin, C., Mautner, N. and Dibden, J. (2007) Public Policy, Private Landholders: Perspectives on Policy Mechanisms for Sustainable Land Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 85, 986-998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.009
[9]  Hein, L., et al. (2006) Spatial Scales, Stakeholders and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209-228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
[10]  Vatn, A. (2010) An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics, 69, 1245-1252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
[11]  Kasperson, J.X., et al. (2003) 1-The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory. The Social Amplification of Risk, 1, 13-46.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461.002
[12]  Salles, J.-M. (2010) évaluer la biodiversité et les services écosystémiques: Pourquoi, comment et avec quels résultats?/Assess Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Why, How and for What Results? Natures Sciences Sociétés, 18, 414-423.
https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011005
[13]  Muradian, R. and Kumar, P. (2009) Payment for Ecosystem Services and Valuation: Challenges and Research Gaps. Payment for Ecosystem Services, 1-16.
[14]  Fisher, B., Turner, R.K. and Morling, P. (2009) Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643-653.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
[15]  Aubin, J., et al. (2017) Implementing Ecological Intensification in Fish Farming: Definition and Principles from Contrasting Experiences. Reviews in Aquaculture, 19 p.
https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12231
[16]  Kaplowitz, M.D. and Hoehn, J.P. (2001) Do Focus Groups and Individual Interviews Reveal the Same Information for Natural Resource Valuation? Ecological Economics, 36, 237-247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3
[17]  Kaplowitz, M.D. (2000) Identifying Ecosystem Services using Multiple Methods: Lessons from the Mangrove Wetlands of Yucatan, Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values, 17, 169-179.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007669404425
[18]  Rodríguez, L.C., Pascual, U. and Niemeyer, H.M. (2006) Local Identification and Valuation of Ecosystem Goods and Services from Opuntia Scrublands of Ayacucho, Peru. Ecological Economics, 57, 30-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.022
[19]  Quétier, F., et al. (2009) Social Representations of an Alpine Grassland Landscape and Socio-Political Discourses on Rural Development. Regional Environmental Change, 10, 119-130.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-009-0099-3
[20]  Mazur, N.A. and Curtis, A.L. (2008) Understanding Community Perceptions of Aquaculture: Lessons from Australia. Aquaculture International, 16, 601-621.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-008-9171-0
[21]  Zendehdel, K., et al. (2008) Qualitative Valuation of Environmental Criteria through a Group Consensus Based on Stochastic Dominance. Ecological Economics, 67, 253-264.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.013
[22]  FLAC (2005) Analyse du poids socio-économique de la filière aquacole lorraine et évolution. Enquête socio-économique. FLAC, Boimont, 30.
[23]  Pro-Mover and ADEMAVIPI (2011) Projecto promovendo piscicultura no alta Vale do Itajai. ADEMAVIPI, Alto Vale do Itajai.
[24]  EPAGRI/CEDAP (2010) Dados da piscicultura de agua doce em Santa Catarina. Epagri, Chapeco.
[25]  Duc, N.M. (2008) Farmers’ Satisfaction with Aquaculture—A Logistic Model in Vietnam. Ecological Economics, 68, 525-531.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.009
[26]  Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S. (2007) What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616-626.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
[27]  Blayac, T., et al. (2014) Perceptions of the Services Provided by Pond Fish Farming in Lorraine (France). Ecological Economics, 108, 115-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.007
[28]  Weiss, K., Moser, G. and Germann, C. (2006) Perception de l’environnement, conceptions du métier et pratiques culturales des agriculteurs face au développement durable. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 73-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2005.04.003
[29]  Villa, F., et al. (2002) Designing an Integrated Knowledge Base to Support Ecosystem Services Valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 445-456.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00093-9
[30]  Agbenyega, O., et al. (2009) Application of an Ecosystem Function Framework to Perceptions of Community Woodlands. Land Use Policy, 26, 551-557.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.011
[31]  Bouton, S.N. and Frederick, P.C. (2003) Stakeholders’ Perceptions of a Wading Bird Colony as a Community Resource in the Brazilian Pantanal. Conservation Biology, 17, 297-306.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01148.x

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133