This paper presents a straightforward solution to an existing internet service so as to enhance its reliability and safety. As the internet society proliferates, myriad of applications, services, and devices are added. Variations among these “things” become unmanageably incompatible. The advent of the Internet of Things or IoT has shed some light on the interoperability issue of these hodgepodges. The proposed framework thus rests on these IoT to achieve such objectives without having to reinvent the wheel or resort to any complex cost-ridden devices and software to operate. The principle is to set up an activity framework that integrates necessary devices to support the designated functionality. This in turn runs on mobile network to serve the internet community. A case study on taxi service apps, having CCTV, GPS, and other monitoring devices and software, is conducted to gauge the viability of the proposed framework. The survey result shows that users are concerned with a few reliability and IoT connectivity factors, namely, cost, schedule, delay, number of vehicles and their proximity. The prospect is promising to broaden the proposed framework in other means of transportation.
References
[1]
Stankovic, J.A. (2014) Research Directions for the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2312291
[2]
Li, S.C., Oikonomou, G., Tryfonas, T., Chen, T.M. and Xu, L.D. (2014) A Distributed Consensus Algorithm for Decision Making in Service-Oriented Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10, 1461-1468.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2306331
[3]
Chen, S., Xu, H., Liu, D., Hu, B. and Wang, H. (2014) A Vision of IoT: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities with China Perspective. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1, 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2337336
[4]
Weinberg, B.D., Milne, G.R., Andonova, Y.G. and Hajjat, F.M. (2015) Internet of Things: Convenience vs. Privacy and Secrecy. Business Horizons, 58, 615-624.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.06.005
[5]
Guo, B., Zhang, D.Q., Wang, Z., Yu, Z.W. and Zhou, X.S. (2013) Opportunistic IoT: Exploring the Harmonious Interaction between Human and the Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36, 1531-1539.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2012.12.028
[6]
Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A. and Xu, L.D. (2015) The Internet of Things—A Survey of Topics and Trends. Information Systems Frontiers, 17, 261-274.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2
[7]
Luzuriaga, J.E., Perez, M., Boronat, P., Cano, J.C., Calafate, C. and Manzoni, P. (2016) Improving MQTT Data Delivery in Mobile Scenarios: Results from a Realistic Testbed. Mobile Information Systems, 2016, Article No. 4015625.
[8]
Razzaque, M.A., Milojevic-Jevric, M., Marija, A. and Clarke, S. (2016) Middleware for Internet of Things: A Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3, 70-95.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2015.2498900
[9]
Hwang, H.C., Park, J. and Shon, J.G. (2016) Design and Implementation of a Reliable Message Transmission System Based on MQTT Protocol in IoT. Wireless Personal Communications, 91, 1765-1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3398-2
[10]
Aziz, B. (2016) A Formal Model and Analysis of an IoT Protocol. Ad Hoc Networks, 36, 49-57.