全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Robust Reconstruction of Sensor Swarms Floating through Enclosed Environments

DOI: 10.4236/wsn.2018.101001, PP. 1-39

Keywords: Sensor Swarm, Offline Reconstruction, Guided-RANSAC, Non-Unique Identifiers

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A novel type of application for the exploration of enclosed or otherwise difficult to access environments requires large quantities of miniaturized sensor nodes to perform measurements while they traverse the environment in a “go with the flow” approach. Examples of these are the exploration of underground cavities and the inspection of industrial pipelines or mixing tanks, all of which have in common that the environments are difficult to access and do not allow position determination using e.g. GPS or similar techniques. The sensor nodes need to be scaled down towards the millimetre range in order to physically fit through the narrowest of parts in the environments and should measure distances between each other in order to enable the reconstruction of their positions relative to each other in offline analysis. Reaching those levels of miniaturization and enabling reconstruction functionality requires: 1) novel reconstruction algorithms that can deal with the specific measurement limitations and imperfections of millimetre-sized nodes, and 2) improved understanding of the relation between the highly constraint hardware design space of the sensor nodes and the reconstruction algorithms. To this end, this work provides a novel and highly robust sensor swarm reconstruction algorithm and studies the effect of hardware design trade-offs on its performance. Our findings based on extensive simulations, which push the reconstruction algorithm to its breaking point, provide important guidelines for the future development of millimetre-sized sensor nodes.

References

[1]  Talnishnikh, E., et al. (2015) Micro Motes: A Highly Penetrating Probe for Inaccessible Environments. In: Leung, H., Ed., Intelligent Environmental Sensing, Springer International Publishing, 33-49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12892-4_2
[2]  European Union’s Horizon 2020 FET-Open project: PHOENIX (No 665347).
https://www.phoenix-project.eu
[3]  Patwari, N., et al. (2005) Cooperative Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (54), July.
[4]  Wymeersch, H., et al. (2009) Cooperative Localization in Wireless Networks. P IEEE, 97, 427-450.
[5]  Duisterwinkel, H.A., et al. (2016) Asymmetric Multi-Way Ranging for Resource- Limited Nodes. 8th EAI International Conference on Ad Hoc Networks (AdHocNets), Ottawa, 26-27 September 2016, 50-63.
[6]  Dubbelman, G., et al. (2014) Robust Sensor Cloud Localization from Range Measurements. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, 14-18 September 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2014.6943099
[7]  Duisterwinkel, H.A., et al. (2016) Mapping Swarms of Resource-Limited Sensor Motes: Solely Using Distance Measurements and Non-Unique Identifiers. IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Engineering Solutions (SSCI 2016), Athens, 6-9 December 2016.
[8]  Jaffe, J.S., et al. (2017) A Swarm of Autonomous Miniature Underwater Robot Drifters for Exploring Submesoscale Ocean Dynamics. Nature Communications, 8, Article Number: 14189
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14189
[9]  Lu, J., et al. (2016) A Small Long-Life Acoustic Transmitter for Studying the Behavior of Aquatic Animals. Review of Scientific Instruments, 87, 114902.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967941
[10]  Duisterwinkel, E.H.A., et al. (2017) Sensor Motes for the Exploration and Monitoring of Operational Pipelines. IEEE Transaction on Instrumentation and Measurements, PP, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2017.2775404
[11]  Wortche, H.J. (2014) Advanced Analysis: Motes Dynamics in a Mixing Tank. Tech. Rep., INGU Solutions, Calgary, AB, Canada.
[12]  Durrant-Whyte, H. and Bailey, T. (2006) Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: Part I. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 13, 99.
[13]  Djugash, J., et al. (2006) Range-Only SLAM for Robots Operating Cooperatively with Sensor Networks. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, 15-19 May 2006, 2078-2084.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2006.1642011
[14]  Haehnel, D. (2004) Mapping and Localization with RFID Technology. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, 26 April-1 May 2004.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1307283
[15]  Neira, J., Davison, A. and Leonard, J. (2008) Guest Editorial, Special Issue in Visual Slam. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24, 929-931.
[16]  Kirkham, R., et al. (2000) PIRAT—A System for Quantitative Sewer Pipe Assessment. International Journal of Robotics Research, 19, 1033-1053.
https://doi.org/10.1177/02783640022067959
[17]  Ribeiro, F., D., et al. (2011) Geometrically Constrained Room Modeling with Compact Microphone Arrays. Audio, Speech, IEEE T AUDIO SPEECH, 20, 1449.
[18]  I. Dokmanic, et al. (2013) Acoustic Echoes Reveal Room Shape. PNAS, 110, No. 30.
[19]  Menegatti, E., et al. (2009) Range-Only SLAM with a Mobile Robot and a Wireless Sensor Network. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Kobe, 12-17 May 2009, 8-14.
[20]  Franchi, A., et al. (2013) Mutual Localization in Multi-Robot Systems Using Anonymous Relative Measurements. The International Journal of Robotics Research, May.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364913495425
[21]  Akyildiz, I.F., Pompili, D. and Melodia, T. (2005) Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Research Challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 3, 257-279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004
[22]  Duisterwinkel, E.H.A. (2018) Exploring Enclosed Environments with Floating Sensors: Mapping using Ultrasound. PhD Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. (To be published)
[23]  Borg, I. and Groenen, P. (2005) Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 207-212.
[24]  Dagher, R., et al. (2014) Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks. In: Wireless Sensor and Robot Networks from Topology Control to Communication Aspects, Worldscientific, Location, 203-247.
[25]  Bachrach, J. and Taylor, C. (2005) Localization in Sensor Networks. In: Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 277-310.
[26]  Schlupkothen, S. and Ascheid, G. (2015) Localization of Wireless Sensor Networks With Concurrently Used Identification Sequences. In: IEEE 14th Annual Mediterranean Ad Hoc Networking Workshop (MED-HOC-NET), Vilamoura, 17-18 June 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MedHocNet.2015.7173166
[27]  Raguram, R., Chum, O., Pollefeys, M., Matas, J. and Frahm, J.-M. (2012) USAC: A Universal Framework for Random Sampling Consensus. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35, 2022-2038.
[28]  Kuemmerle, R., et al. (2011) g2o: A General Framework for Graph Optimization. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, 9-13 May 2011.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2011.5979949
[29]  Schlupkothen, S., et al. (2015) A Novel Low-Complexity Numerical Localization Method for Dynamic Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63, 4102-4114.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133