Physical modeling due to its simulation ability of real conditions has been developed as a proper method to study engineering issues. In this paper after the introduction of usual physical modeling systems in geotechnical engineering, we focused on a low known device of physical modeling in geotechnical practice, especially applicable in deep foundations. It is named Frustum Confining Vessel (FCV) that is one of the calibration chamber forms. It can apply high stress level by a relatively linear stress distribution. Thus, it can simulate actual states for piles in laboratory controlled conditions. The FCV test results can be used for real project by multiply scale factors. Scale factors can be explained by dimensional and similar analyses in every model and apparatus. In this study the relatively largest size of FCV among others in the world, which called FCV-AUT, was used to study physical purposes. Several various model piles (deep foundations) were made by 4 mm thick steel plate with height of 750 mm. All model piles tested in Babolsar sand as surrounding soil via FCV, and two full scale piles tested in similar conditions in the field. The experimental results and outcomes indicated the FCV can be used as a suitable device for physical modelling aims. Thus, it can be realized the FCV is more effective than simple and calibration chambers as well as laminar boxes and more economic than centrifuges.
References
[1]
Altaee, A. and Fellenius, B.H. (1994) Physical Modeling in Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31, 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-049
[2]
Azizi, F. (2000) Applied Analyses in Geotechnics. E & FN Spoon, New York.
[3]
Sedran, G. (1999) Experimental and Analytical Study of a Frustum Confining Vessel. Doctoral Thesis, McMaster University.
[4]
Hettler, A. and Gudehus, G. (1985) A Pressure-Dependent Correction for Displacement Results from 1 G Model Tests with Sand. Géotechnique, 35, 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1985.35.4.497
[5]
Franke, E. and Muth, G. (1985) Scale Effect in lg Model Tests on Horizontally Loaded Piles. Conference of Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, Vol. 2, 1011-1014.
[6]
Baziar, M.H. and Ziaie-Moayed, R. (2006) Evaluation of Cone Penetration Resistance in Loose Silty Sand Using Calibration Chamber. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 4, 106-119.
[7]
Zare, M. and Eslami, A. (2014) Study of Deep Foundations Performance by Frustum Confining Vessel (FCV). International Journal of Civil Engineering.
[8]
Ghionna, V.N. and Jamiolkowski, M. (1991) A Critical Appraisal of Calibration Chamber Testing of Sands. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing, Elsevier, Potsdam, 13-39.
[9]
Bucky, P.B. (1931) Use of Models for the Study of Mining Problems. American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Incorporated.
[10]
Panek, L.A. (1952) Centrifugal Testing Apparatus for Mine-Structure Stress Analysis. Vol. 4883, US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Shen, C., Kim, Y., Bang, S. and Mitchell, J.K. (1982) Centrifuge Modeling of Lateral Earth Support. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 108, 1150-1164.
[13]
Mikasa, M. and Takada, N. (1984) Self Weight Consolidation of Very Soft Clay by Centrifuge. In: Sedimentation Consolidation Models—Predictions and Validation, ASCE, 121-140.
[14]
Hushmand, B., Scott, R.F. and Crouse, C.B. (1988) Centrifuge Liquefaction Tests in a Laminar Box. Geotechnique, 38, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1988.38.2.253
[15]
Philip, C.L. and Robert, V.W. (1986) Effect of Boundary Conditions upon Centrifuge Experiments Using Ground Motion Simulation.
[16]
Gibson, A.D. (1997) Physical Scale Modeling of Geotechnical Structures at One-G. Doctoral Dissertation, California Institute of Technology.
[17]
Prasad, S.K., Towhata, I., Chandradhara, G.P. and Nanjundaswamy, P. (2004) Shaking Table Tests in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Current Science, 87, 1398-1404.
[18]
Jafarzadeh, B. (2004) Design and Evaluation Concepts of Laminar Shear Box for 1G Shaking Table Tests. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Paper No. 1391.
[19]
Eslami, A., Asefi, A. and Neshaei, M.A.L. (2009) Investigation of Anzali Harbor Sand Behavior Using Glass Tank and Vibration Table. Sharif Journal of Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, 25, 15-22.
[20]
Ahmadi, H., Eslami, A. and Arabani, M. (2017) Experimental Study on the Settlement of Marine Deposits of Anzali under Cyclic Loading by Laminar Box Apparatus. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35, 330-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1164771
[21]
Horvath, R.G. and Stolle, D. (1996) Frustum for Testing Model Piles. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33, 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-071
[22]
Khazaie, J. and Eslami, A. (2016) Behavior of Helical Piles—As a Geoenvironmental Choice—By Frustum Confining Vessel (FCV). Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 10, 8-22. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/64113
[23]
Khazaei, J. and Eslami, A. (2017) Postgrouted Helical Piles Behavior through Physical Modeling by FCV. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35, 528-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1213339
[24]
Khazaei, J. and Eslami, A. (2016) Geotechnical Behavior of Helical Piles via Physical Modeling by Frustum Confining Vessel (FCV). International Journal of Geography and Geology, 5, 167-181. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.10/2016.5.9/10.9.167.181
