Aim: To analyze the inter-fraction,
intra-fraction uncertainties and to verify the delivered total dose with
planned dose in the combined intracavitary-interstitial brachytherapy of
gynaecological cancer patients using microMOSFET in-vivo
dosimeter. Materials and Methods: Between May 2014 and March 2016, 22 patients
who underwent brachytherapy treatments with an applicator combination of CT/MR
compatible tandem, ring and Syed-Neblett template-guided rigid needles were
included in this study. Specially designed microMOSFET, after calibration, was
used to analyze the variations in dosimetry of combined
intracavitary-interstitial application. Results: The standard deviation for
Inter-fraction variation among 22 combined intracavitary interstitial
applications ranged between 0.86% and 10.92%. When compared with the first
fraction dose, the minimum and maximum dose variations were −9.5% and
26.36%, respectively. However, the mean doses varied between −5.95%
and 14.49%. Intra-fraction variation, which is the difference of TPS calculated
dose with first fraction microMOSFET-measured dose ranges from −6.77%
to 8.68%. The variations in the delivered total mean dose in 66 sessions with
planned doses were −3.09% to 10.83%. Conclusions: It is found that
there was a gradual increase in microMOSFET measured doses as compared to the
first fraction with that of subsequent fractions in 19 out of 22 applications.
Tumor deformation and edema may be the influencing factors, but the applicator
movements played a major role for the variations. We find that the microMOSFET
is an easy and reliable system for independent verification of uncertainties
during ICBT-ISBT treatments.
References
[1]
Liu, Z., Guo, J., Lin, X., Wang, H., Qiu, L., Ren, X., et al. (2016) Clinical Feasibility of Interstitial Brachytherapy Using a “Hybrid” Applicator Combining Uterine Tandem and Interstitial Metal Needles Based on CT for Locally Advanced Cervical Can-cer. Brachytherapy, 15, 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2016.06.004
[2]
Oike, T., Ohno, T., Noda, S.E., Kiyohara, H., Ando, K., Shibuya, K., et al. (2014) Can Combined Intracavitary/Interstitial Approach Be an Alternative to Interstitial Brachytherapy with the Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) in Computed Tomography-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Bulky and/or Irregularly Shaped Gynecological Tumors? Radiation Oncology, 9, 222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-014-0222-6
[3]
Lambert, J., Nakano, T., Law, S., Elsey, J., McKenzie, D.R. and Suchowerska, N. (2007) In Vivo Dosimeters for HDR Brachytherapy: A Comparison of a Diamond Detector, MOSFET, TLD, and Scintillation Detector. Medical Physics, 34, 1759-1765. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2727248
[4]
Ramaseshan, R., Kohli, K.S., Zhang, T.J., Lam, T., Norlinger, B., Hallil, A., et al. (2004) Performance Characteristics of a MicroMOSFET as an in Vivo Dosimeter in Radiation Therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 49, 4031. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/17/014
[5]
Kinhikar, R.A., Sharma, P.K., Tambe, C.M. and Deshpande, D.D. (2006) Dosimetric Evaluation of a New OneDose MOSFET for Ir-192 Energy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51, 1261. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/5/015
[6]
Onoe, T., Nose, T., Yamashita, H., Yoshioka, M., Toshiyasu, T., Kozuka, T., et al. (2013) High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Malignancies— Dosimetric Changes during Treatment Period. Journal of Radiation Research, 54, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs130
[7]
Rey, F., Chang, C., Mesina, C., Dixit, N., Teo, B.K. and Lin, L.L. (2013) Dosimetric Impact of Interfraction Catheter Movement and Organ Motion on MRI/CT Guided HDR Interstitial Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Cancer. Radiotherapy Oncology, 107, 112-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.12.013
[8]
Syed, A.N., Puthawala, A., Fleming, P., Vora, N., Neblett, D.L., George, F.W., et al. (1979) Interstitial-Intracavitary (Syed-Neblett) Applicator in the Treatment of Carcinoma of Cervix. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, 5, 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(79)90523-6
[9]
Soubra, M., Cygler, J. and Mackay, G. (1994) Evaluation of a Dual Bias Dual Metal Oxide-Silicon Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor Detector as Radiation Dosimeter. Medical Physics, 21, 567-572. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597314
[10]
Chung, J.B., Lee, J.W., Suh, T.S., Lee, D.H., Choe, B.Y., Kim, Y.S., et al. (2009) Dosimetric Characteristics of Standard and Micro MOSFET Dosimeters as in-Vivo Dosimeter for Clinical Electron Beam. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 55, 2566-2570. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.55.2566
[11]
Qi, Z.Y., Deng, X.W., Cao, X.P., Huang, S.M., Lerch, M. and Rosenfeld, A. (2012) A Real-Time in Vivo Dosimetric Verification Method for High-Dose Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Medical Physics, 39, 6757-6763. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4758067
[12]
Schindel, J., Zhang, W., Bhatia, S.K., Sun, W. and Kim, Y. (2013) Dosimetric Impacts of Applicator Displacements and Applicator Reconstruction-Uncertainties on 3D Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 5, 250. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.39453
[13]
Velmurugan, T., Sukumar, P., Krishnappan, C. and Boopathy, R. (2010) Study of Dosimetric Variation due to Interfraction Organ Movement in High Dose Rate Interstital (MUPIT) Brachytherapy for Gynecologic Malignancies. Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering, 16, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10013-010-0008-6
[14]
Kandasamy, S., Reddy, K.S., Nagarajan, V., Vedasoundaram, P. and Karunanidhi, G. (2013) Dosimetric Impact of Inter-Fraction Variation in Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 2, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2013.24015