全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

New Interpretative Categories for Natural and Social Sciences

DOI: 10.4236/ahs.2016.55018, PP. 223-239

Keywords: History of Physical Science, History of Social Sciences, Bernal, Bogdanov, Sohn-Rethel, Koyré, Kuhn, Marx

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

By interpreting and joining together the historiographic categories suggested by Bogdanov, Sohn-Rethel and Koyré I obtained two dichotomies as the foundations of both natural science and social science, providing that they are conveniently interpreted according to each of these two cases. In particular, a new characterization of Marx’ theory of society is obtained.

References

[1]  Adler, F. (1920). Ortszeit, Systemzeit, Zonenzeit und das Ausgezeichnete Bezugsystems der Elektrodynamik. Wien: Wienerervolksbuchhandlung.
[2]  Bernal, D. (1953). Science and Industry in Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge and Kegan.
[3]  Bemal, D. (1950). Science in History. London: Watt.
[4]  Beth, E. W. (1957). Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland.
[5]  Biggart, J. (1987). Bukharin and the Origin of the ‘Proletarian Culture’ Debate. Soviet Studies, 39, 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138708411687
[6]  Biggart, J. (1989). Alexander Bogdanov, Left-Bolshevism and the Proletkult 1904-1932. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
[7]  Bishop, E. (1967). Foundations of Constructive Mathematics. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
[8]  Bogdanov, A. A. (1897). Kratkii kurs economiceskoi nauki [A Short Course of Economic Science]. Moscow.
[9]  Bogdanov, A. A. (1911). Kul’turnye zadachi nashego vremeni [The Cultural Tasks of Our Times]. Moscow: Izdanie S. Dorovatoskogo.
[10]  Bogdanov, A. A. (1918). Nauka i robotici klass. Moscow.
[11]  Bogdaov, A. A. et al. (Eds.) (1982). Fede e Scienza. Torino: Einaudi.
[12]  Brouwer, L. J. (1970). Collected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[13]  Bukharin, N. et al. (Eds.) (1971). Science at Crossroad. London: Cass.
[14]  Carnot, L. (1783). Essai sur les machines en général. Dijon: Defay.
[15]  Carnot, L. (1803). Principes fondamentaux de l’équilibre et du mouvement. Paris: Deterville.
[16]  D’Alembert, J. (1770-1775). Elemens. In D. Diderot, & J. D’Alembert (Eds.), Encyclopédie Francaise (Vol. 17, pp. 498-502). Livourne: Imprimerie des éditeurs.
[17]  Drago, A. (1982). Le implicazioni teoriche dei manoscritti matematici di Marx. Testi & Contesti, 8, 107-116.
[18]  Drago, A. (1987). Money, Objective Scientific Knowledge and Social Consciousness. In J. E. Fenstad, I. T. Frolov, & R. Hilpinen (Eds.), 8th International Congresses in Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (pp. 85-88). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
[19]  Drago, A. (1988). A Characterization of Newtonian Paradigm. In P. B. Scheurer, & G. Debrock (Eds.), Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy (pp. 239-252). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2809-1_16
[20]  Drago, A. (1990a). History of the Relationships Chemistry-Mathematics. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 337, 220-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00322400
[21]  Drago, A. (1994). Interpretazione delle frasi caratteristiche di Koyré e loro estensione alla storia della fisica dell’ottocento. In C. Vinti (Ed.), Alexandre Koyré. L’avventura intellettuale (pp. 657-691). Napoli: ESI.
[22]  Drago, A. (1996). A Paradigm-Shift in Conflict Resolution: War and Peace from a History of Science Viewpoint. In P. Koller, & H. Puhl (Eds.), Current Issues in Political Philosophy (pp. 106-114). Kirchberg: ALWS.
[23]  Drago, A. (2001a). Un comune concetto di scienza dal confronto delle specificità. Voci di Strada, 13, 93-124.
[24]  Drago, A. (2001b). The Several Categories Suggested for the “New Historiography of Science”: An Interpretative Analysis from a Foundational Viewpoint. Epistemologia, 24, 48-82.
[25]  Drago, A. (2010). La teoria delle relatività di Einstein del 1905 esaminata secondo il modello di organizzazione basata su un problema. In E. Giannetto, G. Giannini and M. Toscano (Eds.), Relatività, Quanti, Caos e altre rivoluzioni della Fisica (pp. 215-224). Rimini: Guaraldi.
[26]  Drago, A. (2012). Pluralism in Logic: The Square of Opposition, Leibniz’ Principle of Sufficient Reason and Markov’s Principle. In J.-Y. Béziau, & D. Jacquette (Eds.), Around and beyond the Square of Opposition (pp. 175-189). Basel: Birkhaueser. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3_12
[27]  Drago, A. (2013). The Emergence of Two Options from Einstein’s First Paper on Quanta. In R. Pisano, D. Capecchi, & A. Lukesova (Eds.), Physics, Astronomy and Engineering: Critical Problems in the History of Science and Society (pp. 227-234) Siauliai: Scientia Socialis.
[28]  Drago, A. (Pre-Print). Bogdanov e la scienza alterativa.
[29]  Flores, F. (1999). Einstein’s Theory of Theories and Types of Theoretical Explanation. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 13, 123-134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599908573613
[30]  Foster, J. B., & Burkett, P. (2008). Classical Marxism and the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Organization & Environment, 21, 3-37. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.704.6913&rep=rep1&type=pdf
[31]  Gare, A. (2000). Aleksandr Bogdanov’s History, Sociology and Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 31, 231-248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(00)00002-9
[32]  Gillispie, C. C. (1971). Lazare Carnot Savant. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[33]  Grille, D. (1966). Lenin’s Rivale: Bogdanov und seine Philosphie. Koeln: Wissenschaft und Politik.
[34]  Iannaccone, I. (1988). Connection between Monetary Economy and Production of Mathematical Science in History of China. In T. Kampen (Ed.), Proceeding of 21st Conference of Chinese Studies (pp. 338-347). London: Kegan.
[35]  Iannaccone, I. (1989). Scientific Theories Organisation and State Organisation in Chinese History. Hamburg: Abstracts of 18th International Congress of History of Science.
[36]  Jensen, K. M. (1978). Beyond Marx and Mach: Aleksandr Bogdanov’s Philosophy of Living Experience. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9879-7
[37]  Joravsky, D. (1961). Soviet Marxism and Natural Sciences. New York: Columbia University Press.
[38]  Koyré, A. (1957). From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, MD: Maryland University Press.
[39]  Kuhn, T. S. (1969). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
[40]  Lenin, V. (1927). Materialism and Empiriocriticism. New York: International Publishers.
[41]  Lunacharsky, A. (1908). Religia i sozialism. Moscow: Shipovnik.
[42]  Marx, K. (1970). Critique of the Gotha’s Programme. In K. Marx (Ed.), Selected Works (Vol. 3, pp. 13-30). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[43]  Marx, K. (1959). Economic & Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
[44]  Marx, K. (1990). The Capital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.
[45]  Marx, K. (1983). Mathematical Manuscripts of Karl Marx. London: New Park.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Mathematical_Manuscripts_1881.pdf
[46]  Needham, J. (1954-2015). Science and Civiklization in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[47]  Nowak, L. (1980a). The Structure of Idealization. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7651-2
[48]  Nowak, L. (1980b). On the Idealization Structure of the Economic Theories. Erkenntnis, 30, 223-246.
[49]  Ravetz, J. (1981). Bernal’s Marxist Vision of History. Isis, 72, 393-402.
https://doi.org/10.1086/352789
[50]  Scherrer, J. (1978). Party Schools in Capri and Bologna. Formation of Party Intellighentsia. Cahiers du Monde Russe, 19, 259-294.
[51]  Scherrer, J. (1980). La construction de Dieu marxiste. Russia, 4, 173-198.
[52]  Sochor, Z. A. (1988). Revolution and Culture: The Bogdanov-Lenin Controversy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[53]  Sohn-Rethel, A. (1975). Science as an Alienated Consciousness. Radical Science Journal, 2/3, 65-101.
[54]  Vuchinich, A. (1970). Science and in Russian Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
[55]  Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Unwin Hyman.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133