高低神经质个体的解释偏向特点
The Features of Interpretation Bias on High and Low Neurotic Individuals

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2016.611143, PP. 1137-1141

Keywords: 神经质，解释偏向，模棱两可
Neurotic, Interpretation Bias, Ambiguous

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为了探讨神经质个体在模棱两可的情境中是否存在消极的解释偏向，采用问卷的形式，考察高低神经质组在模棱两可的情境中对积极解释、消极解释和中性解释的得分。结果表明，高神经质个体在积极解释上的得分显著低于低神经质个体，在消极解释上的得分高于低神经质个体。这说明高神经质个体在模棱两可的情境中存在消极的解释偏向。
In order to explore whether the neurotic individuals have negative interpretation bias in ambi-guous situation, the study used questionnaire to investigate the scores of positive explanation, negative explanation and neutral explanation of the high and low neurotic groups. The result shows that the scores of high neurotic individuals on the positive explanation are significantly lower than those of the low neurotic individuals, but higher on the negative explanation. This shows that high neurotic individuals have a negative interpretation bias in ambiguous situation.

References

[1]	郭丹(2014). 高低神经质个体认知加工偏向的实验研究. 硕士论文, 西南大学, 重庆.
[2]	钱铭怡, 武国城, 朱荣春, 张莘(2000). 艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订. 心理学报, 32(3), 317-323.
[3]	张晋, 冯正直(2015). 基于不同自我相关条件下抑郁情绪个体解释偏向的特点研究. 第三军医大学学报, 38(6), 647-651.
[4]	赵海第(2012). 高特质焦虑高中生的认知加工偏向研究. 硕士论文, 河北师范大学, 石家庄.
[5]	Beard, C., & Amir, N. (2009). Interpretation in Social Anxiety: When Meaning Precedes Ambiguity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 406-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-009-9235-0
[6]	Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and Emotional Disorders. New York: International Universities Press.
[7]	Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive Processes in Anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(83)90015-2
[8]	Dai, B. B., Li, J., Chen, T. J., & Li, Q. (2015). Interpretive Bias of Ambiguous Facial Expressions in Older Adults with Depressive Symptoms. PsyCh Journal, 4, 28-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pchj.85
[9]	Kingsbury, M., & Coplan, R. J. (2016). Social Anxiety and Interpretation of Ambiguous Text Messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 368-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.032

Full-Text