Modelling and Analysis of the Hubble Diagram of 280 Type SNIa Supernovae and Gamma Ray Bursts Redshifts with Analytical and Empirical Redshift/Magnitude Functions
Based on an analysis of 280 Type SNIa supernovae and gamma-ray bursts redshifts in the range of z = 0.0104 - 8.1 the Hubble diagram is shown to follow a strictly exponential slope predicting an exponentially expanding or static universe. At redshifts > 2 - 3 ΛCDM models show a poor agreement with the observed data. Based on the results presented in this paper, the Hubble diagram test does not necessarily support the idea of expansion according to the big-bang concordance model.
References
[1]
Marosi, L.A. (2014) Hubble Diagram Test of 280 Supernovae Redshift Data. Journal of Modern Physics, 5, 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2014.51005
[2]
Sorrell, W.H. (2009) Misconceptions about the Hubble Recession Law. Astrophysics and Space Science, 323, 205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-009-0057-z
[3]
Vigoureux, J.M., Vigoureux, B. and Langlois, M. (2014) An Analytical Expression for the Hubble Diagram of Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursts. arXiv:1411.3648v1.
[4]
Traunmüller, H. (2014) From Magnitudes and Redshifts of Supernovae, Their Light-Curves, and Angular Sizes of Galaxies to a Tenable Cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science, 350, 755-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10509-013-1764-z
[5]
Churoux, P. (2015) A New Interpretation of the Hubble Law. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 1227-1232. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2015.69127
[6]
Riess, A.G., Sirolger, A.G., Tonry, J., et al. (2004) Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z > 1 from the Hubble Space Telescope: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution. The Astrophysical Journal, 602, 665-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/383612
[7]
Wei, H. (2010) Observational Constraints on Cosmological Models with the Updated Long Gamma-Ray Bursts. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2010, Article ID: 020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2010/08/020
