Accurately characterizing the wireless
small-scale fading channel has been a challenging task in the wireless
communication era due to the surrounding environment. Therefore, this paper
introduces a new technique to experimentally characterize the small-scale
fading taking under consideration real environmental conditions. By conducting
a two dimensional measurement while the mobile receiver is moving; a more
accurate channel will be achieved. Two-dimensional measurement refers to
collecting data from the receiver along the x and y direction. The two-dimensional
measurement data contain far more information than a one-dimensional data
collected. In order to represent the small-scale channel along with the real
environmental conditions, new approaches are necessary to configure the
two-dimensional system and to analyze the 2D data. The new approach this paper
introduces for the characterization is that the measurements are conducted on a
receiver while it is moving in a two dimensional manner, under different
scenarios, Line-of-sight, Non-line-of-sight, and Two-wave-Diffuse Power. The
experiment was conducted in a 7 meters long by 4 meters wide room, wherein the
distance between the transmitter antenna and receiver is about 3 meters. Those
scenarios represent different real-time conditions where obstacles differ from
one scenario to another. For example, the line of sight scenario assumes there
a clear line of sight between transmitter and receiver, Non line of sight
assumes many obstacles between the transmitter and receiver, i.e. walls,
cabinets, etc. and Two Wave Diffuse Power assumes a metallic reflector
surrounding the receiver. The experiment showed more accurate results when
compared to the one dimensional measurement that has been done in the past where
receiver is moving in one direction and also receiver being fixed where a
constructive and destructive interference is not captured. The two dimensional
measurement technique, i.e. capturing data while receiver moving in both x and
y directions, provided essential information regarding the constructive and
destructive interference patterns caused by the interaction between the
receiver while moving and the obstacles surrounding the receiver.
References
[1]
Henderson, A., Durkin, C. and Durgin, G. Measurement of Small-Scale Fading Distributions in a Realistic 2.4 ghz Channel. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/36951/PGTR070815AHH.pdf
[2]
Hashemi, H. (1993) The Indoor Radio Propagation Channel. Proceedings of the IEEE, 81, 943-968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/5.231342
[3]
Hashemi, H., McGuire, M., Vlasschaert, T. and Tholl, D. (1994) Measurements and Modeling of Temporal Variations of the Indoor Radio Propagation Channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 43, 733-737.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/25.312774
[4]
Kapetanovic, A., Mawari, R. and Zohdy, M.A. (2016) Second-Order Kalman Filtering Application to Fading Channels Supported by Real Data. Journal of Signal and Information Processing, 7, 61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jsip.2016.72008
[5]
Frolik, J. (2007) A Case for Considering Hyper-Rayleigh Fading Channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6, 1235-1239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2007.348319
[6]
Hasimbegovic, E. and Kocan, E. (2014) Experimental Results for Statistical Properties of Signal Envelope in Indoor Fading Channel at 2.4 ghz. Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR), 230-233.
[7]
Vinogradov, E., Joseph, W. and Oestges, C. (2014) Modeling and Simulation of Fast Fading Channels in Indoor Peer-to-Peer Scenarios. 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 433-434.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/eucap.2014.6901784
[8]
De Coster, I., Van Lil, E., Van de Capelle, A. and Perez-Fontan, F. (1999) Indoor Penetration and Interference Studies. IEEE VTS 50th Vehicular Technology Conference, 4, 2303-2307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/vetecf.1999.797349
[9]
Mao, Y., Zhao, Z. and Jia, X. (2011) Understanding the Indoor Interference between IEEE 802.15. 4 and IEEE 802.11 b/g via Measurements. IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 1-5.
[10]
Wong, A.H., Neve, M.J. and Sowerby, K.W. (2005) Performance Analysis for Indoor Wireless Systems Employing Directional Antennas in the Presence of External Interference. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 1, 799-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aps.2005.1551444
[11]
Saberali, S. and Beaulieu, N. (2013) New Expressions for TWDP Fading Statistics. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2, 643-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WCL.2013.090313.130541
[12]
Durgin, G., Rappaport, T. and de Wolf, D.A. (2002) New Analytical Models and Probability Density Functions for Fading in Wireless Communications. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 50, 1005-1015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2002.1010620
[13]
Sijbers, J., Dekker, A., Dyck, D. and Raman, E. (1998) Estimation of Signal and Noise from Rician Distributed Data. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 140-142.
[14]
Dubois, A. (2004) Effects of Phase Change on Reflection in Phase-Measuring Interference Microscopy. Applied Optics, 43, 1503-1507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.001503