Interspinous Process Implants Causes Wear of the Spinous Processes in Patients Treated for Spinal Stenosis—An Experimental Biomechanical Study with Comparison to Clinical Cases
There are few biomechanical studies on
Interspinous Process Implants (IPD); however none investigate the
amount of wear on spinous processes. Therefore the objective of the present
study was to investigate the effect of repetitive loading of the IPD Aperius on
the spinous processes in a biomechanical porcine model. For comparison, three
patients treated surgically with the same device have been followed for one to
two years clinically and with image analyses (X-rays, MRI, CT-scans). Four
lumbar spines from 6 months old porcine were divided into seven segments, which
received IPD. The segments were exposed to 20,000 cyclical loads. Afterwards
the deformation (wear) of the segments was registered. The wear of the spinous
processes was measured in mm on a following CT-scan. Additionally, the wear of
the ex-vivo was compared to that of
the spinous processes investigated by CT-scans or X-ray in three patients treated
surgically with the same interspinous implant. The mean maximal deformation of
porcine specimens was 1.79 mm (SD 0.25) with the largest deformation occurring
in the first quarter of the loading (<5000 cycles). The mean wear of the
spinous processes after loading was 6.57 mm. A similar level of wear (mean 12.7
mm) of the spinous processes was detected in the patients. The Aperius IPD
creates significant wear on the spinous processes in an experimental
biomechanical study. Similar wear of the spinous processes is also
present in patients treated with the same device post-operatively. How these findings influence the short and long term result of this
implant device remains to be investigated in further biomechanical as well as
clinical studies. For future development of this type of devices a proper
selection of materials and design is essential to minimize wear effects on the
spinous processes and thereby increases the possibilities for the devices to
function as suggested.
References
[1]
Siddiqui, M., Nicol, M., Karadimas, E., et al. (2005) The Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in the Lumbar Spine Following Insertion of a Novel Interspinous Process Distraction Device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 2677-2682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000187878.79676.26
[2]
Zucherman, J.F., Hsu, K.Y., Hartjen, C.A., et al. (2005) A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating the X STOP Interspinous Process Decompression System for the Treatment of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication: Two-Year Follow-Up Results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 1351-1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1
[3]
Lindsey, D.P., Swanson, K.E., Fuchs, P., et al. (2003) The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on the Kinematics of the Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in the Lumbar Spine. Spine, 28, 2192-2197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E
[4]
Schmoelz, W., Huber, J.F., Nydegger, T., et al. (2003) Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine and Its Effects on Adjacent Segments: An in Vitro Experiment. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 16, 418-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200308000-00015
[5]
Frelinghuysen, P., Huang, R.C., Girardi, F.P., et al. (2005) Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Part I: Rationale, Biomechanics, and Implant types. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 36, 293-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.014
[6]
Cunningham, B.W., Orbegoso, C.M., Dmitriev, A.E., et al. (2003) The Effect of Spinal Instrumentation Particulate Wear Debris. An in Vivo Rabbit Model and Applied Clinical Study of Retrieved Instrumentation Cases. Spine Journal, 3, 19-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00443-6
[7]
Link, T.M. and Bauer, J.S. (2002) Imaging of Trabecular Bone Structure. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6, 253-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-36723
[8]
McAfee, P.C., DeVine, J.G., Chaput, C.D., et al. (2005) The Indications for Interbody Fusion Cages in the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis: Analysis of 120 Cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, S60-S65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155578.62680.dd
[9]
Ekman, P., Moller, H. and Hedlund, R. (2009) Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34, 1204-1210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a19e66
[10]
Wilke, H.J., Drumm, J., Haussler, K., et al. (2008) Biomechanical Effect of Different Lumbar Interspinous Implants on Flexibility and Intradiscal Pressure. European Spine Journal, 17, 1049-1056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0657-2
[11]
Hartmann, F., Dietz, S.O., Kuhn, S., et al. (2011) Biomechanical Comparison of an Interspinous Device and a Rigid Stabilization on Lumbar Adjacent Segment Range of Motion. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 78, 404-409.
[12]
Hartmann, F., Dietz, S.O., Hely, H., et al. (2011) Biomechanical Effect of Different Interspinous Devices on Lumbar Spinal Range of Motion under Preload Conditions. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 131, 917-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
[13]
Jacobs, W.C., Kruyt, M.C., Verbout, A.J., et al. (2012) Spine Surgery Research: On and beyond Current Strategies. Spine Journal, 12, 706-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.424
[14]
Berg, S., Tropp, H.T. and Leivseth, G. (2011) Disc Height and Motion Patterns in the Lumbar Spine in Patients Operated with Total Disc Replacement or Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain. Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine Journal, 11, 991-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.434
[15]
Pimenta, L., Oliveira, L., Schaffa, T., et al. (2011) Lumbar Total Disc Replacement from an Extreme Lateral Approach: Clinical Experience with a Minimum of 2 Years’ Follow-Up. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 14, 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.spine09865
[16]
Van den Eerenbeemt, K.D., Ostelo, R.W., van Royen, B.J., Peul, W.C. and van Tulder, M.W. (2010) Total Disc Replacement Surgery for Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Spine Journal, 19, 1262-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1445-3
[17]
Bowers, C., Amini, A., Dailey, A.T. and Schmidt, M.H. (2010) Dynamic Interspinous Process Stabilization: Review of Complications Associated with the X-Stop Device. Neurosurgical Focus, 28, E8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1047
[18]
Miller, J.D., Miller, M.C., and Lucas, M.G. (2010) Erosion of the Spinous Process: A Potential Cause of Interspinous Process Spacer Failure. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 12, 210-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.spine09144
[19]
Baranto, A., Ekstrom, L., Hellstrom, M., Lundin, O., Holm, S. and Sward, L. (2005) Fracture Patterns of the Adolescent Porcine Spine: An Experimental Loading Study in Bending-Compression. Spine, 30, 75-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200501010-00014
[20]
Thoreson, O., Baranto, A., Ekstrom, L., Hellstrom, M., Holm, S. and Sward, L. (2010) The Immediate Effect of Repeated Loading on the Compressive Strength of Young Porcine Lumbar Spine. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 18, 694-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1001-z
[21]
Richards, J.C., Majumdar, S., Lindsey, D.P., Beaupré, G.S. and Yerby, S.A. (2005) The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication. Spine, 30, 744-749. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3
[22]
Goyal, A., Goel, V.K., Mehta, A., Dick, D., Chinthakunta, R.S. and Ferrara, L. (2008) Cyclic Loads Do Not Compromise Functionality of the Interspinous Spacer or Cause Damage to the Spinal Segment: An in Vitro Analysis. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 18, 289-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v18.i4.30
[23]
Tudor-Locke, C., Bassett, D.R., Swartz, A.M., et al. (2004) A Preliminary Study of One Year of Pedometer Self-Monitoring. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 158-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2803_3
[24]
Kettler, A., Drumm, J., Heuer, F., Mack, C., Claes, L. and Wilke, H.-J. (2008) Can a Modified Interspinous Spacer Prevent Instability in Axial Rotation and Lateral Bending? A Biomechanical in Vitro Study Resulting in a New Idea. Clinical Biomechanics, 23, 242-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.004
[25]
Wiseman, C.M., Lindsey, D.P., Fredrick, A.D. and Yerby, S.A. (2005) The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading during Extension. Spine, 30, 903-907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8
[26]
Kuchta, J., Sobottke, R., Eysel, P. and Simons, P. (2009) Two-Year Results of Interspinous Spacer (X-Stop) Implantation in 175 Patients with Neurologic Intermittent Claudication Due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. European Spine Journal, 18, 823-829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z