全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Interspinous Process Implants Causes Wear of the Spinous Processes in Patients Treated for Spinal Stenosis—An Experimental Biomechanical Study with Comparison to Clinical Cases

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2016.67027, PP. 201-210

Keywords: Porcine, Interspinous Process Device, Cyclic Loading, Wear, Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenos, Aperius PercLID

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

There are few biomechanical studies on Interspinous Process Implants (IPD); however none investigate the amount of wear on spinous processes. Therefore the objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of repetitive loading of the IPD Aperius on the spinous processes in a biomechanical porcine model. For comparison, three patients treated surgically with the same device have been followed for one to two years clinically and with image analyses (X-rays, MRI, CT-scans). Four lumbar spines from 6 months old porcine were divided into seven segments, which received IPD. The segments were exposed to 20,000 cyclical loads. Afterwards the deformation (wear) of the segments was registered. The wear of the spinous processes was measured in mm on a following CT-scan. Additionally, the wear of the ex-vivo was compared to that of the spinous processes investigated by CT-scans or X-ray in three patients treated surgically with the same interspinous implant. The mean maximal deformation of porcine specimens was 1.79 mm (SD 0.25) with the largest deformation occurring in the first quarter of the loading (<5000 cycles). The mean wear of the spinous processes after loading was 6.57 mm. A similar level of wear (mean 12.7 mm) of the spinous processes was detected in the patients. The Aperius IPD creates significant wear on the spinous processes in an experimental biomechanical study. Similar wear of the spinous processes is also present in patients treated with the same device post-operatively. How these findings influence the short and long term result of this implant device remains to be investigated in further biomechanical as well as clinical studies. For future development of this type of devices a proper selection of materials and design is essential to minimize wear effects on the spinous processes and thereby increases the possibilities for the devices to function as suggested.

References

[1]  Siddiqui, M., Nicol, M., Karadimas, E., et al. (2005) The Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes in the Lumbar Spine Following Insertion of a Novel Interspinous Process Distraction Device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 2677-2682.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000187878.79676.26
[2]  Zucherman, J.F., Hsu, K.Y., Hartjen, C.A., et al. (2005) A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating the X STOP Interspinous Process Decompression System for the Treatment of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication: Two-Year Follow-Up Results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, 1351-1358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000166618.42749.d1
[3]  Lindsey, D.P., Swanson, K.E., Fuchs, P., et al. (2003) The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on the Kinematics of the Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in the Lumbar Spine. Spine, 28, 2192-2197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000084877.88192.8E
[4]  Schmoelz, W., Huber, J.F., Nydegger, T., et al. (2003) Dynamic Stabilization of the Lumbar Spine and Its Effects on Adjacent Segments: An in Vitro Experiment. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 16, 418-423.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200308000-00015
[5]  Frelinghuysen, P., Huang, R.C., Girardi, F.P., et al. (2005) Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Part I: Rationale, Biomechanics, and Implant types. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 36, 293-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.014
[6]  Cunningham, B.W., Orbegoso, C.M., Dmitriev, A.E., et al. (2003) The Effect of Spinal Instrumentation Particulate Wear Debris. An in Vivo Rabbit Model and Applied Clinical Study of Retrieved Instrumentation Cases. Spine Journal, 3, 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00443-6
[7]  Link, T.M. and Bauer, J.S. (2002) Imaging of Trabecular Bone Structure. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 6, 253-261.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-36723
[8]  McAfee, P.C., DeVine, J.G., Chaput, C.D., et al. (2005) The Indications for Interbody Fusion Cages in the Treatment of Spondylolisthesis: Analysis of 120 Cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 30, S60-S65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155578.62680.dd
[9]  Ekman, P., Moller, H. and Hedlund, R. (2009) Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Fusion in Adult Isthmic Spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34, 1204-1210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a19e66
[10]  Wilke, H.J., Drumm, J., Haussler, K., et al. (2008) Biomechanical Effect of Different Lumbar Interspinous Implants on Flexibility and Intradiscal Pressure. European Spine Journal, 17, 1049-1056.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0657-2
[11]  Hartmann, F., Dietz, S.O., Kuhn, S., et al. (2011) Biomechanical Comparison of an Interspinous Device and a Rigid Stabilization on Lumbar Adjacent Segment Range of Motion. Acta Chirurgiae Orthopaedicae et Traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 78, 404-409.
[12]  Hartmann, F., Dietz, S.O., Hely, H., et al. (2011) Biomechanical Effect of Different Interspinous Devices on Lumbar Spinal Range of Motion under Preload Conditions. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 131, 917-926.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1235-8
[13]  Jacobs, W.C., Kruyt, M.C., Verbout, A.J., et al. (2012) Spine Surgery Research: On and beyond Current Strategies. Spine Journal, 12, 706-713.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.424
[14]  Berg, S., Tropp, H.T. and Leivseth, G. (2011) Disc Height and Motion Patterns in the Lumbar Spine in Patients Operated with Total Disc Replacement or Fusion for Discogenic Back Pain. Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine Journal, 11, 991-998.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.434
[15]  Pimenta, L., Oliveira, L., Schaffa, T., et al. (2011) Lumbar Total Disc Replacement from an Extreme Lateral Approach: Clinical Experience with a Minimum of 2 Years’ Follow-Up. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 14, 38-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.spine09865
[16]  Van den Eerenbeemt, K.D., Ostelo, R.W., van Royen, B.J., Peul, W.C. and van Tulder, M.W. (2010) Total Disc Replacement Surgery for Symptomatic Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Spine Journal, 19, 1262-1280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1445-3
[17]  Bowers, C., Amini, A., Dailey, A.T. and Schmidt, M.H. (2010) Dynamic Interspinous Process Stabilization: Review of Complications Associated with the X-Stop Device. Neurosurgical Focus, 28, E8.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1047
[18]  Miller, J.D., Miller, M.C., and Lucas, M.G. (2010) Erosion of the Spinous Process: A Potential Cause of Interspinous Process Spacer Failure. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 12, 210-213.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.spine09144
[19]  Baranto, A., Ekstrom, L., Hellstrom, M., Lundin, O., Holm, S. and Sward, L. (2005) Fracture Patterns of the Adolescent Porcine Spine: An Experimental Loading Study in Bending-Compression. Spine, 30, 75-82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200501010-00014
[20]  Thoreson, O., Baranto, A., Ekstrom, L., Hellstrom, M., Holm, S. and Sward, L. (2010) The Immediate Effect of Repeated Loading on the Compressive Strength of Young Porcine Lumbar Spine. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 18, 694-701.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-1001-z
[21]  Richards, J.C., Majumdar, S., Lindsey, D.P., Beaupré, G.S. and Yerby, S.A. (2005) The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication. Spine, 30, 744-749.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3
[22]  Goyal, A., Goel, V.K., Mehta, A., Dick, D., Chinthakunta, R.S. and Ferrara, L. (2008) Cyclic Loads Do Not Compromise Functionality of the Interspinous Spacer or Cause Damage to the Spinal Segment: An in Vitro Analysis. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants, 18, 289-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v18.i4.30
[23]  Tudor-Locke, C., Bassett, D.R., Swartz, A.M., et al. (2004) A Preliminary Study of One Year of Pedometer Self-Monitoring. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 158-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2803_3
[24]  Kettler, A., Drumm, J., Heuer, F., Mack, C., Claes, L. and Wilke, H.-J. (2008) Can a Modified Interspinous Spacer Prevent Instability in Axial Rotation and Lateral Bending? A Biomechanical in Vitro Study Resulting in a New Idea. Clinical Biomechanics, 23, 242-247.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.004
[25]  Wiseman, C.M., Lindsey, D.P., Fredrick, A.D. and Yerby, S.A. (2005) The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading during Extension. Spine, 30, 903-907.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8
[26]  Kuchta, J., Sobottke, R., Eysel, P. and Simons, P. (2009) Two-Year Results of Interspinous Spacer (X-Stop) Implantation in 175 Patients with Neurologic Intermittent Claudication Due to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. European Spine Journal, 18, 823-829.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0967-z

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133