全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Overview of Kidney Transplantation: A Single Centre Report from China

DOI: 10.4236/ojots.2016.62002, PP. 7-11

Keywords: Kidney Transplantation (KTx), ESRD—End Stage Renal Disease, Deceased Donor (DCD—Donor after Cardiac Death, DBD—Donor after Brain Death)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: Worldwide, End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is one of the leading disease with prolong morbidity. Kidney transplantation offers the best solution for the problem. The shortage of donor kidney is even bigger problem due to transplantation being one of the routine procedures. The use of deceased donor definitely increases the pool of donor with excellent immediate and long-term follow-up proven results. Aim: The aim is to analyze and summarize the outcome of Kidney transplantation. Methods & Materials: A total of 78 cases of Kidney Transplantation were selected for the study and categorized as: Group I—41 (living Donor), Group II—23 (DCD) & Group III—15 (DBD). Perspective study was done with clean data recorded & maintained pre-operatively, post-operatively and follow-up from Jan 2011 to Dec 2015 in our hospital. Post-operative graft status, complications and at least 1-year follow-up were area of main focus. Results: All patients underwent successful kidney transplantation. In Group I, the number of living donor kidney transplantation is 41 whereas in Group II (DCD) & III (DBD), the number of deceased donor transplantation is 23 and 15 respectively. The Normal functioning of graft (NGF) was 38 (87.8%), 16 (69.6%) & 11 (73.3%) in Group I, II & III respectively along with Poor Graft function (PGF) in Group I—4 (9.7%), II—5 (21.7%) & III—2 (13.3%) managed by continuing dialysis. Delayed graft function (DGF) was noted I-1 (2.4%), II-2 (8.6%) & III-1 (6.6%) in respective group, which returned to normal function post intervention. Therefore, 1st year graft survival was >93% [(Group I (97.6%), Group II (95.6%) & Group III (93.3%) respectively]. Manageable surgical complication were found in Group I—8 (19.5%), Group II—5 (21.7%) & Group III—2 (13.3%) like hematoma, hydronephrosis, leakage except one emboli related nephrectomy of transplanted kidney & one pneumonia led death in Group II. The overall survival was greater than 90% [(Group I (97.6%), Group II (91.3%) & Group III (93.3%) respectively] in all three groups after at least 1-year follow-up study, which was an excellent prognosis. Conclusion: Kidney Transplantation is safe, effective and the best method of treatment for ESRD. Significant improvement in quality of life is the hallmark merit over dialysis. Paired donation program should be encouraged in order to overcome shortage of kidney, which increases living donor pool. Outcome in living donor Kidney transplantation is always better than deceased donor

References

[1]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidney_transplantation
[2]  Pine, J.K., Goldsmith, P.J., Ridgway, D.M., et al. (2010) Comparable Outcomes in Donation after Cardiac Death and Donation after Brainstem Death: A Matched Analysis of Renal Transplants. Transplant Proceedings, 42, 3947-3948.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.072
[3]  Ledinh, H., Bonovoisin, C., Weekers, L., et al. (2010) Results of Kidney Transplantation from Donors after Cardiac Death. Transplant Proceedings, 42, 2407-2424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.055
[4]  http://www.kidneyfund.org/kidney-disease/kidney-failure/
[5]  http://www.declarationofistanbul.org
[6]  Huang, J., Mao, Y. and Millis, J.M. (2008) Government Policy and Organ Transplantation in China. The Lancet, 372, 1937-1938.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61359-8
[7]  Chinese Ministry of Health (2011) The Basic Principle of Chinese Human Organ Distribution and Sharing and Core Policy of Liver and Kidney Transplant. Chinese J Transplant, 5, 72-76.
[8]  Kim, B.S., Joo, S.H., Ahn, H.J., et al. (2014) Outcomes of Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation in a Single Centre. Transplantation Proceedings, 46, 1067-1070.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.12.014
[9]  Kostro, J.Z., Hellman, A., Kobiela, J., et al. (2016) Quality of Life after Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Study. Transplantation Proceedings, 48, 50-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.058
[10]  Rodrigue, J.R., Mandelbrot, D.A., Pavlakis, M., et al. (2010) A Psychological Intervention to Improve Quality of Life and Reduce Psychological Distress in Adults Awaiting Kidney Transplantation. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 26, 709-715.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq382
[11]  Bura, P. and Bona, M.D. (2006) Quality of Life Following Organ Transplantation. Transplant International, 20, 397-409.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00440.x
[12]  Jofre, R., Lopez-Gomez, J.M., Moreno, F., et al. (1998) Changes in Quality of Life after Renal Transplantation. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 32, 93-100.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669429
[13]  Sedigh, A., Tufveson, G., Backman, L., et al. (2013) Initial Experience with Hypothermic Machine Perfusion of Kidneys from Deceased Donors in the Uppsala Region in Sweden. Transplant Proceedings, 45, 1168-1171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.017
[14]  Taniguchi, M., Furukawa H., Kawai, T., et al. (2014) Establishment of Educational Program for Multiorgan Procurement from Deceased Donors. Transplant Proceedings, 46, 1071-1073.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.02.002

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133