全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Proximal Femoral Cortical Thickness and Medullary Canal Diameter in Soft and Hard Water Regions

DOI: 10.4236/ojo.2016.63009, PP. 58-62

Keywords: Hip, Hard Water, Soft Water, Femoral Cortical Thickening, Medullary Diameter

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study compared proximal femoral morphology in patients living in soft and hard water regions. The proximal femoral morphology of two groups of 70 patients living in hard and soft water regions with a mean age of 72.29 (range: 50 to 87 years) was measured using an antero-posterior radiograph of the non-operated hip with magnification adjusted. The medullary canal diameter at the level of the lesser trochanter (LT) was significantly wider in patients living in the hard water region (mean width: 1.9 mm wider; p = 0.003). No statistical significant difference was found in the medullary canal width at 10 cm below the level of LT, Dorr index, or Canal Bone Ratio (CBR). In conclusion, the proximal femoral morphology does differ in patients living in soft and hard water areas. These results may have an important clinical bearing in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. Further research is needed to determine whether implant survivorship is affected in patients living in hard and soft water regions.

References

[1]  South West Water.
http://www.southwestwater.co.uk/index.cfm?articleid=11233&searchkey=hard%20water
[2]  Bierenbaum, M.L., Fleischman, A.I., Dunn, J.P., et al. (1972) Serum Lipids in Hard and Soft Water Communities. Israel Journal of Medical Science, 5, 567.
[3]  Karp, H.J., Ketola, M.E. and Lamberg-Allardt, C.L.E. (2009) Acute Effect of Calcium Carbonate, Calcium Citrate and Potassium Citrate on Markers of Calcium and Bone Metabolism in Young Women. British Journal of Nutrition, 102, 1341-437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509990195
[4]  Bonjour, J.P. (2011) Calcium and Phosphate: A Duet of Ions Playing for Bone Health. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 30, 438S-448S.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2011.10719988
[5]  Smith Jr., R.W. and Walker, R.R. (1964) Femoral Expansion in Raging Women: Implications for Osteoporosis and Fractures. Science, 145, 156-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3628.156
[6]  Ruff, C.B. and Hayes, W.C. (1984) Age Changes in Geometry and Mineral Content of the Lower Limb Bones. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 12, 573-584.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02371450
[7]  Ericksen, M.F. (1979) Aging Changes in the Medullary Cavity of the Proximal Femur in American Blacks and Whites. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51, 563-569.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330510408
[8]  Dorr, L.D. (1993) Structural and Cellular Assessment of Bone Quality of Proximal Femur. Bone, 14, 231-242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2
[9]  Yeung, Y., Chiu, K.Y., Yau, W.P., Tang, W.M., Cheung, W.Y. and Ng, T.P. (2006) Assessment of the Proximal Femoral Morphology Using Plain Radiograph—Can It Predict the Bone Quality? The Journal of Arthroplasty, 21, 408-413.
[10]  Noble, P.C., Box, G.G., Kamaric, E., Fink, M.J., Alexander, J.W. and Tullos, H.S. (1998) The Effect of Aging on the Shape of the Proximal Femur. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 319, 31-44.
[11]  Huiskes, R. (1980) Stress Analyses of Implanted Orthopaedic Joint Prostheses for Optimal Design and Fixation. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 46, 711-727.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133