This paper questions the generally accepted assumption that one can make a random choice that is independent of the rest of the universe. We give a general description of any setup that could be conceived to generate random numbers. Based on the fact that the initial state of such setup together with its environment cannot be known, we show that the independence of its generated output cannot be guaranteed. Some consequences of this theoretical limitation are discussed.
References
[1]
Colbeck, R. (2007) Quantum and Relativistic Protocols for Secure Multi-Party Computation. Ph. D Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
[2]
Colbeck, R. and Kent, A. (2011) Private Randomness Expansion with Untrusted Devices. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44, 095305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/9/095305
[3]
Pironio, S., Acín, A., Massar, S., Boyer de la Giroday, A., Matsukevich, D.N., Maunz, P., Olmschenk, S., Hayes, D., Luo, L., Manning, T.A. and Monroe, C. (2010) Random Numbers Certified by Bell’s Theorem. Nature, 464, 1021-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09008
[4]
Vazirani, U. and Vidick, T. (2012) Certifiable Quantum Dice. Philosophical Transactions A: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370, 3432-3448.
[5]
Kim, Y.H., Yu, R., Kulik, S.P., Shih, Y. and Scully, M.O. (2000) Delayed “Choice” Quantum Eraser. Physical Review Letters, 84, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1
[6]
Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[7]
Aspect, A., Grangier, P. and Roger, G. (1982) Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Physical Review Letters, 49, 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91
[8]
Bell, J.S. (1964) On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, 195200.
[9]
Bell, J.S. (1987) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
