全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Ureteroscopic Management of Ureteral Calculi: Pneumatic versus Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy

DOI: 10.4236/oju.2016.63008, PP. 36-42

Keywords: Ureteral Calculus, Ureteroscopy, Lithotripsy, Laser

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background: Among various intracorporeal lithotripters, pneumatic lithotripter has become the widely used tool for the treatment of urinary stones. Recently the holmium: YAG laser has been used with a wide range of potential urological applications, including intracorporeal lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Purpose: Compare the effectiveness and complications of treatment for ureteric stones between holmium laser lithotripsy and pneumatic lithotripsy. Material and Methods: Comparison of 100 patients presented with ureteric stones, group one (50) of whom were treated with pneumatic lithotripsy and group two (50) with holmium laser was done and the effectiveness and complications of both were analyzed. Results: There was no difference in patient age, sex, stone size and location of stones between the two groups. The immediate stone free rates were 88% in the holmium: YAG group and 66% in the pneumatic lithotripsy group (p < 0.05). The four weeks stone free rates were 98% and 94% respectively (p = 0.07). The mean ± SD operative time in the holmium: YAG group (40 ± 26 min) was shorter than those with pneumatic lithotripsy group (60 ± 40 min). Postoperative stay in hospital was less than 24 hours in holmium: YAG group (70.4%) and shorter than those for pneumatic group (29.6%) (p < 0.002). Post treatment complications such as ureteral perforation were encountered in only two patients who underwent pneumatic lithotripsy. Other complications, such as mucosal injury, ureteral perforation and postoperative fever; there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. While light hematuria was found more frequently in the pneumatic group (14%) in comparison to laser group (12%) (p = 0.02). On the other hand, the overall complication rates between the two groups was statistically significant (8%) laser group vs. (32%) pneumatic group (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy was associated with shorter operation time and postoperative hospitalization period. These data suggest that holmium: YAG lithotripsy was safe and more effective than Pneumatic lithotripsy in the aspect of immediate stone free rate. We believe that holmium: YAG is an excellent treatment modality for managing ureteral calculi.

References

[1]  Grasso, M. (1996) Experience with the Holmium Laser as an Endoscopic Lithotrite. Urology, 48, 199-206.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00158-6
[2]  Osti, A.H., Hofmockel, G. and Frohmuller, H., (1997) Ureteroscopic Treatment of Ureteral Stones: Only An Auxiliary Measure of Extracorporeal Shoch Wave Lithotripsy or a Primary Therapeutic Option? Urologia Internationalis, 59, 177-181.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000283057
[3]  Teichman, J.M., Rao, R.D., Rogenes, V.J. and Harris, J.M. (1997) Ureteroscopic Management of Ureteral Calculi: Electrohydraulic Versus Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy. The Journal of Urology, 158, 1358-1361.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64214-9
[4]  Knudsen, B., Beiko, D. and Denstedt, J. (2004) Stenting after Ureteroscopy: Prosandcons. Urologic Clinics of North America, 31, 173-180.
[5]  Seon, S., Jeon, J. and Kyu-Sung, L. (2005) A Comparison of Holmium: YAG Laser with Lithoclast Lithotripsy in Ureteral Calculi Fragmentation. International Journal of Urology, 12, 544-547.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01087.x
[6]  Vassar, G.J., Chan, K.F., Teichman, J.M., et al. (1999) Holmium: YAG Lithotripsy: Photothermal Mechanism. Journal of Endourology, 13, 181-190.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.181
[7]  Dushinski, L., Dushinski, J.W. and Lingeman, J.E. (1998) High-Speed Photographic Evaluation of Holmium Laser. Journal of Endourology, 12, 177-181.
[8]  Bader, M.J., Eisner, B., Porpiglia, F., Preminger, G.M. and Tiselius, H.G. (2012) Contemporary Management of Ureteral Stones. European Urology, 61, 764-772.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.009
[9]  Devarajan, R., Ashraf, M., Beck, R.O., Lemberger, R.J. and Taylor, M.C. (1998) Holmium: YAG Lithotripsy of Ureteric Calculi; an Experience of 300 Procedures. British Journal of Urology, 82, 342-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.1998.00754.x
[10]  Breda, A., Ogunyemi, O., Leppert, J.T., et al. (2008) Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy for Single Intrarenal Stone 2 cm or Greater Is This a New Frontier? The Journal of Urology, 179, 981-984.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083
[11]  Calvano, C.J., Moran, M.E., White, M.D., et al. (1999) Experimental Utilization of the Holmium Laser in a Model of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Energyanalysis. Journal of Endourology, 13, 113-115.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.1999.13.113
[12]  Scarpa, R.M., De Lisa, A., Porru, D. and Usai, E. (1999) HO: YAG Laser Ureterolithotripsy. European Urology, 35, 233-238.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000019852
[13]  Aghamir, S.K., Mohseni, M.G. and Ardestani, A. (2003) Treatment of Ureteral Calculi with Ballistic Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology, 17, 887-890.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/089277903772036208
[14]  Denstedt, J.D., Eberwein, P.M. and Singh, R.R. (1992) The Swiss Lithoclast: A New Device for Intracorporeal Lithotripsy. Journal of Endourology, 148, 1088-1090.
[15]  Elganainy, E., Hameed, D.A., Elgammal, M., Abd-Elsayed, A.A. and Shalaby, M. (2009) Experience with Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones;Should We Abandon Using Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopes and Pneumatic Lithoclast? International Archives of Medicine, 2, 13-17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-2-13
[16]  Tan, P.K., Tan, S.M. and Consigliere, D. (1998) Ureteroscopic Lithoclast Lithotripsy: A Cost-Effective Option. Journal of Endourology, 12, 341.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.1998.12.341
[17]  Aridogan, A., Zeren, S. and Bayazit, Y. (2005) Complications of Pneumatic Ureterolithotripsy in the Early Post-Operative Period. Journal of Endourology, 19, 50-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.50
[18]  Razzaghi, M.R., Razi, A., Mazloomfard, M.M., Taklimi, A.G., Valipour, R. and Razzaghi, Z. (2013) Safety and Efficacy of Pneumatic Lithotripter versus Holmium Laser in Management of Ureteral Calcui. Urology Journal, 10, 762-766.
[19]  Razaghi, M., Razi, A., Mazloomfard, M.M., Mokhtarpour, H., Javanmard, B. and Mohammadi, R. (2011) Trans-Ureterolithotripsy of Ureteral Calculi: Which Is the Best; Pneumatic or Holmium Laser Technique? Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 2, 59-62.
[20]  Tipu, S.A., Malik, H.A., Mohhayuddin, N., Sultan, G., Hussain, M., Hashmi, A., et al. (2007) Treatment of Ureteric Calculi—Use of Holmium: YAG Laser Lithotripsy versus Pneumatic Lithoclast. JPMA, 57, 440-443.
[21]  Bhandari, B.B. and Basnet, R.B. (2011) Comparison of Holmium Laser and Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Stones. JGPEMN, 17-20.
[22]  Sandhu, A.S., Srivastava, A., Madhusoodanan, P., et al. (2007) Holmium: YAG Laser for Intra Corporeal Lithotripsy. MJAFI, 63, 48-51.
[23]  Sun, Y., Wang, L., Liao, G., Xu, C., Yang, Q. and Qian, S. (2002) Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Laser Lithotripsy in the Endoscopic Treatment of Ureteric Calculi. Journal of Endourology, 15, 587-588.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/089277901750426346
[24]  Menon, M., Parulkar, B.C., Drash, G.W., et al. (2007) Urinary Lithiasis: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. In: Walsh, P.C., Ed., Campbell’s Urology, 9th Edition, Saunders, Philadelphia, 2661-2733.
[25]  Teichman, J.M., Vassar, G.J., Bishoff, J.T. and Bellman, G.C. (1998) Holmium: YAG Lithotripsy Yields Smaller Fragments than Lithoclast, Pulsed Dye Laser or Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy. The Journal of Urology, 159, 17-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63998-3
[26]  Denstedt, J., Wollin, T., Sofer, M., Nott, L., Weir, M. and Honey, J. (2011) A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Non-Stented versus Stented Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy. The Journal of Urology, 165, 1419-1422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66320-3
[27]  Foreman, D. and Plagakis, S., Fuller, A.T. (2014) Should We Routinely Stent after Ureteropyeloscopy? Department of Urology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide. BJUI.
[28]  Segura, J.W., Preminger, G.M., Assimos, D.G., Dretler, S.P., Kahn, R.I. and Macluso, J.N. (1997) Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel Summary Report on the Management of Ureteral Calculi. The Journal of Urology, 158, 1915-1921.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64173-9
[29]  Beaghler, M., Poon, M., Ruckle, H., Stewart, S. and Wei, D. (1998) Complications Employing the Holmium: YAG Laser. Journal of Endourology, 12, 533-555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.1998.12.533

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133