全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

急性心肌梗死伴心衰、心源性休克病人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗近中期疗效

, PP. 1064-1066

Keywords: 心肌梗死,心力衰谒,心源性休克,pci,溶栓,梗死相关血管

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的观察st段抬高急性心肌梗死(ami)伴心衰、心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pci)的近期、中期疗效。方法总结分析206例st抬高ami患者的临床资料,其中伴心衰和/或休克90例。对心衰或/和心源性休克患者行pci58例(pci组:急诊pci41例,外院转入行补救性pci17例),药物溶栓20例(溶栓组),一般治疗12例(未行再灌注组);分析各组患者的临床特征,并比较pci组及溶栓组的住院时间、住院及随访期间不良心血管事件发生率、心功能恢复情况,观察pci组血管开通时间、timi血流与预后的关系。结果pci组、溶栓组血管开通率分别为98.3%和65.0%(p<0.01),平均住院时间分别为(15.3±3.5)d和(20.5±4.4)d,住院及随访期间死亡率pci组6.9%,溶栓组25%(p<0.05)。pci组两亚组术后心功能恢复均好于溶栓组(p<0.01和p<0.05)。结论对于st段抬高ami伴心衰、心源性休克患者,pci与溶栓相比,能及时开通血管且开通率高,术后近期及中期心功能恢复较好,不良心血管事件少,是一种安全有效的治疗措施,可作为首选。

References

[1]  widimskyp,budesinskyt,voracd,etal.longdistancetransportforprimaryangioplastyvsimmediatethrombolysisinacutemyocardialinfarction.finalresultsoftherandomizednationalmulticentretrial-prague-2[j].eurheartj,2003,24(1):94-104.
[2]  kaulu,saprar,singhb,etal.reversalofslowflowphenomenonduringprimarystentingbybail-outadministrationofabciximab[j].intjcardiovascintervent,2000,3(1):35-9.
[3]  pianarn,paikgy,moscuccim,etal.incidenceandtreatmentofno-reflowafterpercutaneouscoronaryintervention[j].circulation,1994,89(6):2514-8.
[4]  grubee,gerckensu,yeungac,etal.preventionofdistalembolizationduringcoronaryangioplastyinsaphenousveingraftsandnativevesselsusingporousfilterprotection[j].circulation,2001,104(20):2436-41.
[5]  weaverwd,simesrj,betriua,etal.comparisonofprimarycoronaryangioplastyandintravenousthrombolytictherapyforacutemyocardialinfarction:aquantitativereview[j].jama,1997,278(23):2093-8.
[6]  毛焕元,曹林生.心脏病学[m].第2版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.1116-7.
[7]  黄晓明,庞振瑶,黄群英,等.延期冠心病介入治疗对急性心肌梗死患者中远期左室功能及预后的影响[j].第一军医大学学报,2003,23(12):1347-50.huangxm,pangzy,huangqy,etal.mid-tolong-termeffectsofdelayedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiononleftventricularfunctionandprognosisinpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction[j].jfirstmilmeduniv/diyijunyidaxuexuebao,2003,23(12):1347-50.
[8]  zijlstraf,hoomtjejc,deboermj,etal.long-termbenefitofprimaryangioplastyascomparedwiththrombolytictherapyforacutemyocardialinfarction[j].nengljmed,1999,341(19):1413-9.
[9]  lemaymr,labinazm,daviesrf,etal.stentingversusthrombolysisinacutemyocardialinfarctiontrial(stat)[j].jamcollcardiol,2001,37(4):985-91.
[10]  kaulu,singhb,sudand,etal.outcomeofprimarystentingforacutemyocardialinfarction[j].indianheartj,1998,50(4):402-8.
[11]  morishimai,sonet,okumurak,etal.angiographicno-reflowphenomenonasapredictorofadverselong-termoutcomeinpatientstreatedwithpercutaneoustransluminalcoronaryangioplastyforfirstacutemyocardialinfarction[j].jamcollcardiol,2000,36(4):1202-9.
[12]  widimskyp,grochl,zelizkom,etal.multicentrerandomizedtrialcomparingtransporttoprimaryangioplastyvsimmediatethrombolysisvscombinedstrategyforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionpresentingtoacommunityhospitalwithoutacatheterizationlaboratory:thepraguestudy[j].eurheartj,2000,21(10):823-31.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133