全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

拟松材线虫不同致病力虫株体内细菌的种类差异

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.011

Keywords: 拟松材线虫, 致病力, 黑松, 体内细菌
Bursaphelenchus mucronatus
, pathogenic, Pinus thunbergii, endobacteria

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

拟松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus mucronatus)为伞滑刃属植物寄生线虫,在形态上与引起松树萎蔫病(Pine Wild Disease)的松材线虫(B. xylophilus)极其相似。为探讨拟松材线虫的致病力与其体内细菌的关系,笔者将来自中国7省市不同地区的10个拟松材线虫虫株接种黑松测定其致病力,并对拟松材线虫的体内细菌进行了分离鉴定。结果表明,供试的10个拟松材线虫虫株中有6个虫株对黑松具致病力,4个虫株无致病力。通过分离拟松材线虫的体内细菌,发现有9个虫株体内存在细菌,共分离获得17株细菌,仅有1个虫株体内未分离到细菌。综合细菌菌落形态、生理生化指标、Biolog 96 孔碳源及16S rDNA序列分析对分离所得细菌进行了鉴定,结果从不同拟松材线虫虫株体内共鉴定出9属9种细菌,分别为嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(Stenotrophomonas maltophilia)、美洲爱文氏菌(Ewingella americana)、荧光假单胞菌(Pseudomonas fluorescens)、根癌农杆菌(Agrobacterium tumefaciens)、Luteibacter anthropi、氧化微杆菌(Microbacterium oxydans)、Agreia pratensis、长野雷弗森菌(Leifsonia naganoensis),以及木糖氧化产碱菌木糖氧化亚种(Achromobacter xylosoxidans ssp. xylosoxidans)。对黑松有致病力的拟松材线虫多数虫株体内细菌的种类及数量多于无致病力的虫株,且能分离到嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌(S.maltophilia)的多数虫株均具有致病力,无致病力虫株的体内细菌主要为氧化微杆菌(M. oxydans)等。
Bursaphelenchus mucronatus is one of plant parasitic nematodes and similar to the causative agent of pine wilt disease B. xylophilus in morphology. To understand the interaction between B. mucronatus and endobacteria, ten strains of B. mucronatus from seven provinces were inoculated to 2-year old Pinus thunbergii to evaluate their virulence. Besides, endobacteria of B. mucronatus were also isolated and analyzed. Pathogenic measurement showed that six strains of B. mucronatus were pathogenic to P.thunbergii, but the other four strains had no pathogenicity. Seventeen strains of endobacteria were isolated from 9 of 10 B. mucronatus strains. Physiological and biochemical characteristics, biolog methods combined with molecular revealed that seventeen strains of endobacteria belonged to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Ewingella americana, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Agrobacterium tumefaciens,Luteibacter anthropi, Microbacterium oxydans, Agreia pratensis, Leifsonia naganoensis and Achromobacter xylosoxidans ssp. xylosoxidans. Further analysis showed that species and population of endobacteria strains from virulent B. mucronatus strains were more abundant than that from non-virulent strains. S. maltophilia were usually isolated from virulent B. mucronatus strains, while endobacteria M. oxydans were mainly isolated from avirulent strains

References

[1]  abelleiraa,picoagaa,mansillaa,etal.detectionofbursaphelenchusxylophilus,causalagentofpinewiltdiseaseonpinuspinasterinnorthwesternspain[j].floridaentomologist,2013,96(3):770-780.
[2]  chengxy,xiepz,chengfx,etal.competitivedisplacementofthenativespeciesbursaphelenchusmucronatusbyanalienspeciesbursaphelenchusxylophilus(nematoda:aphelenchida:aphelenchoididae):acaseofsuccessfulinvasion[j].biologicalinvasions,2009,11(2):205-213.
[3]  rutherfordt,rigae,websterj.temperature-mediatedbehavioralrelationshipsinbursaphelenchusxylophilus,b.mucronatus,andtheirhybrids[j].journalofnematology,1992,24(1):40.
[4]  jikumarus,togashik.boardingabilitiesofbursaphelenchusmucronatusandb.xylophilus(nematoda:aphelenchoididae)onmonochamusalternatus(coleoptera:cerambycidae)[j].nematology,2003,5(6):843-849.
[5]  mamiyay,endan.bursaphelenchusmucronatusn.sp.(nematoda:aphelenchoididae)frompinewoodanditsbiologyandpathogenicitytopinetrees[j].nematologica,1979,25(3):353-361.
[6]  tomminenj.pathogenicitystudieswithbursaphelenchusmucronatusinscotspineinfinland[j].europeanjournalofforestpathology,1993,23(4):236-243.
[7]  程瑚瑞,林茂松,钱汝驹.拟松材线虫(bursaphelenchusmucronatus)的形态诊断和致病性研究[j].南京农业大学学报,1986,5(2):55-61.chenghr,linms,qianrj.astudyonthemorohologicaldiagnosisandthepathogenicityofbursaphelenchusmucronatus[j].journalofnanjingagriculturaluniversity,1986,5(2):55-61.
[8]  braaschh,caroppos,ambrogionil,etal.pathogenicityofvariousbursaphelenchusspeciestopinesandimplicationstoeuropeanforests[c]//kazuyoshif,katsumit,takefumii.sustainabilityofpineforestsinrelationtopinewiltanddecline.proceedingsofinternationalsymposium.tokyo:shokado,1999.
[9]  bakkea,andersonr,kvammet.pathogenicityofthenematodesbursaphelenchusxylophilusandb.mucronatustopinussylvestrisseedlings:agreenhousetest[j].scandinavianjournalofforestresearch,1991,6(1-4):407-12.
[10]  赵博光,刘玉涛,林峰.松材线虫与其携带细菌之间的相互影响[j].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,29(3):1-4.zhaobg,liuyt,linf.mutualinfluencesbetweenbursaphelenchusxylophilusandbacteriacarries[j].journalofnanjingforestryuniversity:naturalsciencesedition,2005,29(3):1-4.
[11]  谈家金,向红琼,冯志新.松材线虫伴生细菌的分离鉴定及其致病性[j].林业科技开发,2008,22(2):23-6.tanjj,xianghq,fengzx.apreliminarystudyonisolation,identificationandpathogenicityofthebacteriumaccompanyingbursaphelenchusxylophilus[j].chinaforestryscienceandtechnology,2008,22(2):23-6.
[12]  wuxq,yuanwm,tianxj,etal.specificandfunctionaldiversityofendophyticbacteriafrompinewoodnematodebursaphelenchusxylophiluswithdifferentvirulence[j].internationaljournalofbiologicalsciences,2013,9(1):34-44.
[13]  袁为敏,吴小芹,叶建仁,等.松材线虫和拟松材线虫体内细菌的透射电镜观察及分离鉴定[j].微生物学报,2011,51(8):1071-1077.yuanwm,wuxq,yejr,etal.observationbytransmissionelectronmicroscopeandidentificationofendophyticbacteriaisolatedfrombursaphelenchusxylophilusandb.mucronatus[j].actamicrobiologicasinica,2011,51(8):1071-1077.
[14]  张治宇,张克云,林茂松,等.不同松材线虫群体对黑松的致病性测定[j].南京农业大学学报,2002,25(2):43-46.zhangzy,zhangky,linms,etal.phthogenticitydeterminationofbursanhelenchusxylophilustopinethunbergii[j].journalofnanjingagriculturaluniversity,2002,25(2):43-46.
[15]  张兴华.拟松材线虫体表微生物及其致病作用研究[d].成都:四川农业大学,2009.zhangxh.studyonthemicroorganismcarriedbybursaphelenehusmucronatusandtheirpathogenicity[d].chengdu:sichuanagriculturaluniversity,2009.
[16]  zhangx,yueng.effectsofculturefluidsandpreinductionofchitinaseproductiononbiocontrolofbipolarisleafspotbystenotrophomonasmaltophiliac3[j].biologicalcontrol,2000,18(3):277-286.
[17]  torresar,araujowl,cursinol,etal.diversityofendophyticenterobacteriaassociatedwithdifferenthostplants[j].thejournalofmicrobiology,2008,46(4):373-379.
[18]  杨宝君.松材线虫病[m].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.yangbj.pinewiltdisease[m].beijing:chineseforestrypublishinghouse,2003.
[19]  motamm,braaschh,bravoma,etal.firstreportofbursaphelenchusxylophilusinportugalandineurope[j].nematology,1999,1(7):727-734.
[20]  fonsecal,cardosoj,lopesa,etal.thepinewoodnematode,bursaphelenchusxylophilus,inmadeiraisland[j].helminthologia,2012,49(2):96-103.
[21]  kanzakin,futaik.isbursaphelenchusmucronatusaweakpathogentothejapaneseredpine?[j].nematology,2006,8(4):485-489.
[22]  kawazuk,kanekon.asepsisofthepinewoodnematodeisolateokd-3causesittoloseitspathogenicity[j].japanesejournalofnematology,1997,27(2):76-80.
[23]  kawazuk,yamashitah,kobayashia,etal.isolationofpine-wiltingbacteriaaccompanyingpine(pinus)woodnematode,bursaphelenchusxylophilus,andtheirtoxicmetabolites[j].scientificreportsofthefacultyofagriculture-okayamauniversity,1998,87:1-7.
[24]  dongxz,caimy.identificationsystemmanualofcommonbacteria[j].beijing:sciencepress,2001.
[25]  delaliberajri,vasanthakumara,burwitzbj,etal.compositionofthebacterialcommunityinthegutofthepineengraver,ipspini(say)(coleoptera)colonizingredpine[j].symbiosis(rehovot),2007,43(2):97-104.
[26]  hollakc,vanweelys,vanoersm,etal.markedelevationofplasmachitotriosidaseactivity.anovelhallmarkofgaucherdisease[j].journalofclinicalinvestigation,1994,93(3):1288.
[27]  h?ftem,devosp.plantpathogenicpseudomonasspecies[c]//plant-associatedbacteria.netherlands:springer,2006:507-533.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133