全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Prevalence of Urogenital Infections in Pregnant Women Experiencing Preterm and Full-Term Labor

DOI: 10.1155/2012/878241

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Urogenital infections are extremely prevalent during pregnancy and are an important cause of premature labor. However, the prevalence of urogenital infections during childbirth is not well known. Objective. Identify urogenital infections present at the beginning of labor in both full-term and preterm pregnancies. Study Design. Ninety-four women were admitted to the inpatient maternity clinic of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). In total, 49 women in preterm labor and 45 women in full-term labor were included in the study, and samples of urinary, vaginal, and perianal material were collected for microbiological analysis. Results. The prevalences of general infections in the preterm labor group and the full-term labor group were 49.0% and 53.3% ( ), respectively. Urogenital infections in the preterm and full-term labor groups included urinary tract infection in 36.7% and 22.2% of women, vaginal candidiasis in 20.4% and 28.9% of women, bacterial vaginosis in 34.7% and 28.9% of women, and group B streptococcus in 6.1% and 15.6% of women, respectively. Conclusions. Urogenital infections were prevalent in women in preterm labor and full-term labor; however, significant differences between the groups were not observed. 1. Introduction Urogenital infections (UGIs) are prevalent during pregnancy and are recognized as an important cause of premature labor. However, little is known about the prevalence of UGIs during labor [1]. Normal cervicovaginal flora plays a crucial role in the defense against the growth and ascension of pathogens. Lactobacilli exercises a local defense mechanism due to its production of lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide. During pregnancy, an imbalance in the vaginal flora favors the colonization of the urogenital system by microorganisms, which can complicate a pregnancy [2]. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VC), and trichomoniasis are responsible for 90% of cases of infectious vulvovaginitis, which can lead to gynecological and obstetrical complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease, postabortion endometritis, chorioamnionitis, and premature labor [3, 4]. The most common infection among women in preterm labor (PTL) and preterm delivery (PTD) is BV. During pregnancy, normal vaginal microbiota, which consists primarily of lactobacilli, is substituted by anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella vaginalis and Mycoplasma homini, resulting in a significant reduction in lactobacilli and increased pH (greater than 4.5) [5–7]. Vaginal Candidiasis (VC) is an infection of the vulva and vagina that is caused

References

[1]  L. F. Cram, M. I. Zapata, E. C. Toy, and B. Baker, “Genitourinary infections and their association with preterm labor,” American Family Physician, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 241–248, 2002.
[2]  R. Usui, A. Ohkuchi, S. Matsubara et al., “Vaginal lactobacilli and preterm birth,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 458–466, 2002.
[3]  M. R. Genc and C. E. Ford, “The clinical use of inflammatory markers during pregnancy,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2010.
[4]  W. S. Biggs and R. M. Williams, “Common gynecologic infections,” Primary Care, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2009.
[5]  S. L. Hillier, R. P. Nugent, D. A. Eschenbach, et al., “Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birthweight infant. The vaginal infections and prematurity study group,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 333, no. 26, pp. 1737–1742, 1995.
[6]  G. Donders, “Diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis and other types of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora: a review,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 462–473, 2010.
[7]  P. C. Giraldo, A. M. D. Fachini, R. T. G. Pereira, S. Pereira, A. V. Nowakonski, and M. R. L. Passos, “A pertinência de lactobacillus sp na flora vaginal durante o trabalho de parto premturo,” Jornal Brasileiro de Doen?as Sexualmente Transmissíveis, vol. 18, pp. 200–203, 2006.
[8]  P. L. Fidel Jr., “Distinct protective host defenses against oral and vaginal candidiasis,” Medical Mycology, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 359–375, 2002.
[9]  J. M. Achkar and B. C. Fries, “Candida infections of the genitourinary tract,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 253–273, 2010.
[10]  F. Young, “Dealing with trichomoniasis,” The Journal of Family Health Care, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 153–155, 2006.
[11]  D Curzik, A. Drazancic, and Z. Hrgovic, “Nonspecific aerobic vaginitis and pregnancy,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 187–192, 2001.
[12]  J. S. Platt and W. F. O'Brien, “Group B streptococcus: prevention of early-onset neonatal sepsis,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 191–196, 2003.
[13]  R. S. Gibbs, S. Schrag, and A. Schuchat, “Perinatal infections due to group B Streptococci,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 1062–1076, 2004.
[14]  B. N. Jahromi, S. Poorarian, and S. Poorbarfehee, “The prevalence and adverse effects of group B streptococcal colonization during pregnancy,” Archives of Iranian Medicine, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 654–657, 2008.
[15]  C. Beraldo, A. S. J. Brito, H. O. Saridakis, and T. Matsuo, “Prevalência da coloniza??o vaginal e anorretal por estreptococo do grupo B em gestantes do terceiro trimestre,” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 543–549, 2004.
[16]  M. L. Nomura, R. P. Júnior, U. M. Oliveira, and R. Calil, “Coloniza??o materna e neonatal por estreptococo do grupo B em situa??es de ruptura pré-termo de membranas e no trabalho de parto prematuro,” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 397–403, 2009.
[17]  G. Letamo and R. G. Majelantle, “Factors influencing low birth weight and prematurity in Botswana,” Journal of Biosocial Science, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 391–403, 2001.
[18]  T. Soriano LLora, M. Juarranz Sanz, J. Valero de Bernabé, et al., “Estudio Del bajo peso al nascer em dos áreas sanitárias de Madrid,” Medicina General, vol. 43, pp. 263–273, 2002.
[19]  A. L. Bernal, “Mechanisms of labour—biochemical aspects,” An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 110, no. 20, pp. 39–45, 2003.
[20]  J. C. Hauth, W. W. Andrews, and R. L. Goldenberg, “Infection-related risk factors predictive of spontaneous preterm labor and birth,” Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–90, 1998.
[21]  V. J. Johnston and D. C. Mabey, “Global epidemiology and control of Trichomonas vaginalis,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2008.
[22]  Centers for Disease Controls and Prevention—CDC, “Laboratory practices for prenatal group B streptococcal screening—seven states, 2003,” MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 53, no. 23, pp. 506–509, 2004.
[23]  L. C. Benchetrit, S. E. Francalanza, H. Peregrino, A. A. Camelo, and L. A. Sanches, “Carriage of Streptococcus agalactiae in women and neonates and distribution of serological types: a study in Brazil,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 787–790, 1982.
[24]  C. O. Macelin, D. A. F. Carvalho, C. Brites, et al., “Isolamento do Streptococcus agalactiae de gestantes na regi?o de Londrina PR,” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia & Obstetrícia, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 915–918, 1995.
[25]  J. A. Sim?es, P. C. Giraldo, A. D. Ribeiro Filho, and A. Faundes, “Prevalência e fatores de risco associados à infec??es cérvico-vaginais durante a gesta??o,” Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia & Obstetrícia, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 459–467, 1996.
[26]  E. A. Figueiró-Filho, A. M. B. Bispo, M. M. Vasconcelos, M. Z. Maia, and F. G. Celestino, “Infec??o do trato urinário na gravidez: aspectos atuais,” Femina, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 165–171, 2009.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133