全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Show-Up Identification Procedure: A Literature Review

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2016.41012, PP. 86-95

Keywords: Show-Up, Identification Accuracy, Eyewitness Identification, System Variables, Estimator Variables

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A show-up is an identification procedure that only presents the witness with one suspect in contrast to a lineup where the suspect is presented among a number of fillers (i.e., known innocent people). This feature makes the show-up procedure very suggestive. In this literature review, an overview of the current research about this identification procedure is presented. The different factors that influence the accuracy in show-up procedures are separated into system (e.g., clothing bias, instruction bias, and the impact of multiple show-ups) and estimator variables (e.g., age, cross-race effects, and alcohol) in line with Wells [1]. The implications of the research are discussed together with suggestions for future research.

References

[1]  Wells, G.L. (1978) Applied Eyewitness-Testimony Research: System Variables and Estimator Variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1546
[2]  Dysart, J.E. and Lindsay, R.C.L. (2007a) Show-Up Identifications: Suggestive Technique or Reliable Method? In: Lindsay, R.C.L., Ross, D.F., Read, J.D. and Toglia, M.P., Eds., The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Volume 2: Memory for People. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 137-153.
[3]  Smith, A.M., Bertrand, M., Lindsay, R.C.L., Kalmet, N., Grossman, D. and Provenzano, D. (2014) The Impact of Multiple Show-Ups on Eyewitness Decision-Making and Innocence Risk. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 247-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xap0000018
[4]  Steblay, N., Dysart, J.E., Fulero, S. and Lindsay, R.C.L. (2003) Eyewitness Accuracy Rates in Police Showup and Lineup Presentations: A Meta-Analytic Comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 523-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025438223608
[5]  Steblay, N.K., Dysart, J.E. and Wells, G.L. (2011) Seventy-Two Tests of the Sequential Lineup Superiority Effect: A Meta-Analysis and Policy Discussion. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17, 99-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021650
[6]  Wells, G.L. (1984) The Psychology of Lineup Identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02223.x
[7]  Agricola, B.H. (2009) The Psychology of Pretrial Identification Procedures: The Showup Is Showing out and Undermining the Criminal Justice System. Law and Psychology Review, 33, 125-137.
[8]  Wells, G.L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R.S., Fulero, S.M. and Brimacombe, C.A.E. (1998) Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and Photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025750605807
[9]  Lindsay, R.C. and Wells, G.L. (1985) Improving Eyewitness Identifications from Lineups: Simultaneous versus Sequential Lineup Presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
[10]  Kassin, S.M., Tubb, V.A., Hosch, H.M. and Memon, A. (2001) On the “General Acceptance” of Eyewitness Testimony Research: A New Survey of the Experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.5.405
[11]  Malpass, R.S., Tredoux, C.G. and McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2007b) Lineup Construction and Lineup Fairness. In: Lindsay, R.C.L., Ross, D.F., Read, J.D. and Toglia, M.P., Eds., The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Volume 2: Memory for People, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 137-153.
[12]  Valentine, T., Davis, J.P., Memon, A. and Roberts, A. (2012) Live Showups and Their Influence on a Subsequent Line-Up. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1796
[13]  Police and Evidence Criminal Act 1984—Code of Practice, Code D (2008) Code of Practice for the Identification of Persons by Police Officers. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/117599//pace-code-d.pdf
[14]  Dysart, J.E., Lindsay, R.C.L. and Dupuis, P.R. (2006) Show-Ups: The Critical Issue of Clothing Bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1009-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1241
[15]  Yarmey, A.D., Yarmey, M.J. and Yarmey, A.L. (1996) Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in Showups and Lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 459-477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01498981
[16]  Steblay, N.M. (1997) Social Influence in Eyewitness Recall: A Meta-Analytic Review of Lineup Instruction Effects. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 283-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024890732059
[17]  Wells, G.L. and Bradfield, A.L. (1998) “Good, You Identified the Suspect”: Feedback to Eyewitnesses Distorts Their Reports of the Witnessing Experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
[18]  Loftus, G.R. (1985) Observations: Evaluating Forgetting Curves. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 397-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.397
[19]  Deffenbacher, K.A., Bornstein, B.H., McGorty, E.K. and Penrod, S.D. (2008) Forgetting the Once-Seen Face: Estimating the Strength of an Eyewitness’s Memory Representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 139-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139
[20]  Wetmore, S.A., Neuschatz, J.S., Gronlund, S.D., Wooten, A., Goodsell, C.A. and Carlson, C.A. (2015) Effect of Retention Interval on Showup and Lineup Performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 8-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003
[21]  Haw, R.M., Dickinson, J.J. and Meissner, C.A. (2007) The Phenomenology of Carryover Effects between Show-Up and Line-Up Identification. Memory, 15, 117-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210601171672
[22]  Searcy, J.H., Bartlett, J.C. and Memon, A. (1999) Age Differences in Accuracy and Choosing in Eyewitness Identification and Face Recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 538-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03211547
[23]  Pozzulo, J.D. and Lindsay, R.C.L. (1998) Identification Accuracy of Children versus Adults: A Meta-Analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 549-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025739514042
[24]  Dekle, D.J., Beal, C.R., Elliott, R. and Honeycutt, D. (1996) Children as Witnesses: A Comparison of Lineup versus Showup Identification Methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199602)10:1<1::AID-ACP354>3.0.CO;2-Y
[25]  Beal, C.R., Schmitt, K.L. and Dekle, D.J. (1995) Eyewitness Identification of Children: Effects of Absolute Judgements, Nonverbal Response Options, and Event Coding. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 197-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01499325
[26]  Meissner, C.A. and Bringham, J.C. (2001) Thirty Years of Investigating the Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
[27]  Jackiw, L.B., Arbuthnott, K.D., Pfeifer, J.E., Marcon, J.L. and Meissner, C.A. (2008) Examining the Cross-Race Effect in Lineup Identification Using Caucasian and First Nation Sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 40, 52-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0008-400x.40.1.52
[28]  Lawson, V.Z. and Dysart, J.E. (2014) The Showup Identification Procedure: An Exploration of Systematic Biases. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 54-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02057.x
[29]  Steblay, N.M. (1992) A Meta-Analytic Review of the Weapon Focus Effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02352267
[30]  Fawcett, J.M., Russell, E.J., Peace, K.A. and Christie, J. (2013) Of Guns and Gees: A Meta-Analytic Review of the “Weapon Focus” Literature. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 35-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.599325
[31]  Pickel, K.L. (1999) The Influence of Context on the “Weapon Focus” Effect. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 299-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022356431375
[32]  US Department of Justice (2008) Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008 Statistical Tables. NCJ Publication No. 227669. US Department of Justice, Washington DC.
[33]  Evans, J.R., Compo, N.S. and Russano, M.B. (2009) Intoxicated Witnesses and Suspects: Procedures and Prevalence According to Law Enforcement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 194-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016837
[34]  Steele, C.M. and Josephs, R.A. (1990) Alcohol Myopia: Its Prized and Dangerous Effects. American Psychologist, 45, 921-933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921
[35]  Dysart, J.E., Lindsay, R.C.L., MacDonald, T.K. and Wicke, C. (2002) The Intoxicated Witness: Effects of Alcohol on Identification Accuracy from Show-Ups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 170-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.170

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133