全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

IlluminaMiSeq测序平台测定蒙古羊瘤胃液相和固相菌群多样性

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2015.10.034

Keywords: IlluminaMiSeq,液相,固相,细菌,多样性

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本研究旨在比较蒙古羊瘤胃液相和固相细菌菌群多样性。应用IlluminaMiseq测序平台的16SrRNA基因扩增子技术对采集自5只蒙古羊的瘤胃液相和固相样品进行高通量测序,采用UPARSE-操作分类单元(OTU)法和非加权组平均(UPGMA)法分析试验结果。结果表明,共获得91971条序列和15321个OTU,平均每个样品有13138条序列和2189个OTU。液相与固相样品相比:门水平分类上存在显著性差异的优势菌群为拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)(P<0.05),拟杆菌门在液相和固相样品中的比例分别为67%和45%;属水平分类上存在显著性差异的优势菌群为普氏菌属(Prevotella)和1种未鉴定(unknown)的属(P<0.05),液相样品优势菌群为普氏菌属,所占比例为53%,而固相样品优势菌群来自1种未鉴定的属,所占比例为32%;种水平分类上存在显著性差异的是栖瘤胃普雷沃菌(Prevotellaruminicola)(P<0.05),在液相和固相样品中所占的比例分别为41%和11%。与液相样品相比,固相样品的alpha多样性较好;主成分分析(PCA)和主坐标分析(PCoA)显示来自同一动物个体的瘤胃液相和固相样品聚类在一起。结果提示,蒙古羊瘤胃液相和固相样品均具有丰富的细菌菌群;与液相样品相比,固相样品细菌的多样性更好。

References

[1]  KEBREAB E,DIJKSTRA J,BANNINK A,et al.Recent advances in modeling nutrient utilization in ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science,2009,87(14):E111-E122.
[2]  ST-PIERRE B,WRIGHT A D G.Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos)[J].BMC Microbiology,2012,12(1):1.
[3]  ZHOU J Z,BRUNS M A,TIEMDJE J M.DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1996,62(2):316-322.
[4]  DRAY S,DUFOUR A B.The ade4 package:implementing the duality diagram for ecologists[J].Journal of Statistical Software,2007,22(4):1-20.
[5]  JAMI E,MIZRAHI I.Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals [J].PLoS ONE,2012,7(3):e33306.
[6]  KITTELMANN S,SEEDORF H,WALTERS W A,et al.Simultaneous amplicon sequencing to explore co-occurrence patterns of bacterial,archaeal and eukaryotic microorganisms in rumen microbial communities[J].PLoS One,2013,8(2):e47879.
[7]  OSBORNE J M,DEHORITY B A.Synergism in degradation and utilization of intact forage cellulose,hemicellulose,and pectin by three pure cultures of ruminal bacteria[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology,1989,55(9):2247-2250.
[8]  SINGH K M,PANDYA P R,TRIPATHI A K,et al.Study of rumen metagenome community using qPCR under different diets[J].Meta Gene,2014,2:191-199.
[9]  FOUTS D E,SZPAKOWSKI S,PURUSHE J,et al.Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen[J].PLoS One,2012,7(11):e48289.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133