全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

不同粉碎粒度的饲料对滤袋法测定纤维物质含量的影响

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2013.02.016

Keywords: 粉碎粒度,滤袋技术,中性洗涤纤维,酸性洗涤纤维,中性洗涤不溶蛋白,酸性洗涤不溶蛋白

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本试验旨在研究不同粉碎粒度的饲料对滤袋法测定饲料中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、中性洗涤不溶蛋白(NDIP)及酸性洗涤不溶蛋白(ADIP)含量的影响。采集黑龙江、河南及河北3个省的30个不同种类的饲料样品,分为5类(干草类饲料、农副产品类饲料、青贮类饲料、糟渣类饲料和饼粕类饲料),各类饲料分别粉碎为2个处理长度,粗粉碎组为2.00mm,细粉碎组为0.45mm(过40目分析筛),测定各样品的NDF、ADF、NDIP和ADIP含量。结果显示:1)粗粉碎组和细粉碎组的干草类饲料、饼粕类饲料NDF含量差异极显著(P<0.01);2组间干草类饲料、青贮类饲料ADF含量差异极显著(P<0.01),糟渣类饲料、饼粕类饲料ADF含量差异显著(P<0.05)。粗粉碎组饲料的NDF和ADF含量普遍高于细粉碎组。2)粗粉碎组和细粉碎组的NDIP含量除青贮类饲料差异显著(P<0.05)外,其余几类饲料的NDIP含量差异均不显著(P>0.05);2组间各类饲料的ADIP含量差异均不显著(P>0.05)。结果提示,采用滤袋法测定不同粉碎粒度的饲料NDF和ADF含量差异较大,建议采用2.00mm的粉碎粒度进行测定;采用滤袋法测定不同粉碎粒度的饲料NDIP和ADIP含量差异较小。

References

[1]  杨凤.动物营养学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2005.
[2]  VAN SOEST P J.Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds.Ⅰ.Preparation of fiber residues of low nitrogen content[J].Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1963,46:825-829.
[3]  BEAUCHEMIN K A.Using ADF and NDF in dairy cattle diet formulation-a western Canadian perspective[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996,58:101-111.
[4]  HACKMANN T J,SPAIN J N.A mechanistic model for predicting intake of forage diets by ruminants[J].Journal of Animal Science,2010,88:1108-1124.
[5]  ELLIS J L,QIAO F,CANT J P.Prediction of dry matter intake throughout lactation in a dynamic model of dairy cow performance[J].Journal of Dairy Science.2006,89(5):1558-1570.
[6]  CLARK P W,ARMENTANO L E.Effectiveness of neutral detergent fiber in and dried distillers grains compared with whole cottonseed alfalfa haylage[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1993(76):2644-2650.
[7]  OGDEN R K,COBLENTZ W K,COFFEY K P,et al.Ruminal in situ disappearance kinetics of nitrogen and neutral detergent insoluble nitrogen from common crabgrass forages sampled on seven dates in northern Arkansas[J].Journal of Animal Science,2006,84(3):669-677.
[8]  张丽英,王宗义,李德发.滤袋技术在饲料纤维素分析中的应用[J].饲料工业,2001,22(5):9-10.
[9]  KENNETH P V,JEFFREY F P,STEVEN D M,et al.Evaluation of a filter bag system for NDF,ADF,and IVDMD forage analysis[J].Crop Science,1999,39:276-279.
[10]  JOSE P F,MARA S G,JOS L D,et al.Variability among four laboratories of the filter bag technique to determine acid and neutral detergent fiber contents in ruminant feeds from argentina[J].Journal of AOAC International,2009,92(2):371-374.
[11]  魏时来,蔺淑琴,李典,等.饲粮样品粉碎粒度对ADF和NDF尼龙滤袋法测定值的影响[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2008,27:3-5.
[12]  SNIFFEN C J,O''CONNOR J D,VAN SOEST P J,et al.A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:Ⅱ.Carbohydrate and protein availability[J].Journal of Animal Science,1992,70:3562-3577.
[13]  AOAC.Official methods of analysis[M].15th ed.Arlington VA:Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists,1990.
[14]  VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A.Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J].Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3574-3583.
[15]  HARRIS L E,BUTRUM R R,SORESON A W.International food component data system[J].Journal of the American Dietetic Association,1984,84(10):1210-1215.
[16]  张子仪.中国饲料学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[17]  李慧玲,郭振华,牛昌奎.制样方法对粗饲料中NDF和ADF测定值的影响[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2010(3):97-99.
[18]  薛红枫,孟庆翔.不同方法测定反刍动物饲料NDF、ADF和木质素含量的比较[J].中国畜牧杂志,2006,42(19):41-45.
[19]  DOANE P H,PELL A N,SCHOFIELD P.The Effect of preservation method on the neutral detergent soluble fraction of forages[J].Journal of Animal Science,1997,75:1140-1148.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133