全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

页岩气储层纵横波叠前联合反演方法

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20141225, PP. 4141-4149

Keywords: 叠前联合反演,页岩气储层,贝叶斯理论,杨氏模量,泊松比

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

杨氏模量与密度乘积(Eρ)能够突显页岩气储层的异常特征,泊松比能够指示储层的含流体性.与常规叠前弹性参数反演相比,基于Eρ、泊松比和密度的叠前纵横波联合反演可以获得更加精确的弹性参数,为页岩气储层识别和流体预测提供可靠的依据.首先,推导了基于Eρ、泊松比和密度的纵波和转换波反射系数近似方程,利用典型模型对新推导的反射系数方程做精度分析,当入射角小于30°时,新推导的反射系数公式具有较高的精度;其次,充分利用纵波和转换波的信息,在贝叶斯的框架下,建立叠前纵横波联合反演流程,进行Eρ、泊松比和密度的直接反演,避免了间接反演带来的累积误差;最后,利用实际工区井模型数据进行算法测试,结果表明,该反演方法所获得的Eρ、泊松比和密度的估计值与真实值吻合较好,满足精细地震反演的精度要求.

References

[1]  Aki K, Richards P G. 1980. Quantitative Seismology Theory and Methods. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
[2]  Helen V, Landr M. Simultaneous inversion of PP and PS seismic data. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3): R1-R10.
[3]  Hu G Q, Liu Y, Wei X C, et al. 2011. Joint PP and PS AVO inversion based on Bayes theorem. Applied Geophysics, 8(4): 293-302.
[4]  Huang H D, Zhao D, Ren D Z, et al. 2011. A thin bed inversion method based on Bayes theory. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 46(6): 919-924.
[5]  Larsen J A. 1999. AVO inversion by simultaneous P-P and P-S inversion [Master''heesis]. Calgary: University of Calgary, 9-37.
[6]  Sharma R K, Chopra S. 2013. New attribute for determination of lithology and brittleness. CSEG Recorder, 44-47.
[7]  Zong Z Y, Yin X Y, Zhang F, et al. 2012. Fluid identification method based on compressional and shear wave modulus direct inversion. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 55 (11): 3786-3794, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.01.028.
[8]  Buland A, More H. 2003. Bayesian linearized AVO inversion. Geophysics, 68(1): 185-198.
[9]  Chen J J, Yin X Y. 2007. Three-parameter AVO waveform inversion based on Bayesian theorem. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 50(4): 1251-1260.
[10]  Chen J S, Glinsky M E. 2013. Stochastic inversion of seismic PP and PS data for reservoir parameter estimation. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 305-309.
[11]  Chen T S, Liu Y, Wei X C. 2006. Joint amplitude versus offset inversion of P-P and P-SV seismic data. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science) (in Chinese), 26(1): 33-37.
[12]  Chopra S, Sharma R K, Keay J, et al. 2012. Shale gas reservoir characterization workflows. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1344-1348.
[13]  Downtown J E, Pickford S, Lines L R. 2001. Constrained three parameter AVO inversion and uncertainty analysis. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 251-254.
[14]  Sun Z D, Jia C Z, Li X F, et al. 2011. Unconventional Oil and Gas Exploration and Development (in Chinese). Beijing: Publication of Petroleum Industry, 865-970.
[15]  Zhang G Z, Wang D Y, Yin X Y, et al. 2011a. Study on prestack seismic inversion using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(11): 2926-2932, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.11.022.
[16]  Zhang G Z, Wang D Y, Yin X Y. 2011b. Seismic Parameter estimation using Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 46(4): 605-609.
[17]  Zong Z Y, Yin X Y, Wu G C. 2011. Reflection coefficient equation and pre-stack seismic inversion with Young'' modulus and Poisson ration. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 55(1): 284-292, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.025.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133