全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于勒夫波的鲁甸MS6.5地震震源复杂性分析

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20140925, PP. 3006-3017

Keywords: 鲁甸MS6.5地震,勒夫波,视震源时间函数,震源复杂性

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2014年8月3日,云南省鲁甸县发生了MS6.5地震,造成600余人死亡,震害之大出人预料.我们利用经验格林函数技术从国家地震台网记录的宽频带勒夫波提取了视震源时间函数,通过分析其方位依赖性获得了关于震源结构与能量辐射复杂性的认识,进而讨论了它们与震害之间的关系.对视震源时间函数的分析表明,能量释放的时间过程比较简短,83%的能量集中释放于前10s,但这次地震发生于两个走向分别为60°和150°左右的相互交叉的断层,破裂开始于60°取向的断层,起初以双侧破裂为主,后来向60°方位的传播占优势,但很快触动了150°取向的断层,同样,起初以双侧破裂为主,后来向150°方位的传播占优势.由于两条断层同时参与了这次地震,近场能量辐射具有较强的方位复杂性,其中60°~210°方位能量辐射较强.所以,能量释放时间过程之简短但交叉的震源结构和依赖于方位的能量辐射应该是造成如此震害的主要原因.

References

[1]  Fang L H, Han L B, Wu J P. 2014a. http://www.eq-igl.ac.cn/wwwroot/c_000000090001/d_1406.html.
[2]  Fang L H, Yang T, Wu J P. 2014b. http://www.eq-igl.ac.cn/wwwroot/c_000000090001/d_1406.html.
[3]  Lay T, Wallace T C. 1995. Modern Global Seismology. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
[4]  Kennett B L N. 1983. Seismic Wave Propagation in Stratified Media. Cambridge University Press.
[5]  Xu X W. 2014. http://www.eq-igl.ac.cn/wwwroot/c_000000090001/d_1406.html.
[6]  Yan C, Xu L S. 2014. An inversion technique for the mechanisms of local and regional earthquakes: generalized polarity and amplitude technique (I)—Principle and numerical tests. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(8): 2555-2572.
[7]  Zhang Y, Xu L S, Chen Y T. 2009. PLD method for retrieving apparent source time function and its application to the 2005 Kashmir Mw7.6 earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 52(3): 672-680.
[8]  Zhang Y, Xu L S, Chen Y T. 2014a. http://www.cea-igp.ac.cn/tpxw/270724.shtml.
[9]  Zhang Y, Xu L S, Chen Y T, et al. 2014b. Rupture process of the 3 August 2014 Ludian, Yunnan, MW6.1(MS6.5) earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese),57(9):3052-3059,doi:10.6038/cjg20140930.
[10]  Zheng X F, Yao Z X, Liang J H, et al. 2010. The role played and opportunities provided by IGP DMC of China National Seismic Network in Wenchuan earthquake disaster relief and researches. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100(5B): 2866-2872.
[11]  Zheng X F, Ouyang N, Zhang D N, et al. 2009. Technical system construction of Data Backup Centre for China Seismograph Network and the data support to researches on the Wenchuan earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 52(5): 1412-1417.
[12]  Liu C, Xu L S, Chen Y T. 2014. http://www.cea-igp.ac.cn/tpxw/270724.shtml.
[13]  Kennett B L N, Engdahl E R, Buland R. 1995. Constraints on seismic velocities in the earth from traveltimes. Geophys. J. Int., 122(1): 108-124.
[14]  Waldhauser F, Ellsworth W L. 2000. A Double-Difference earthquake location algorithm: Method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 90(6): 1353-1368.
[15]  Wang C Y, Mooney W D, Wang X L, et al. 2002. Study on 3-D velocity structure of crust and upper mantle in Sichuan-Yunnan region, China. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 24(1): 1-16.
[16]  Wang R J. 1999. A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green''s functions. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 89(3): 733-741.
[17]  Wang W L, Wu J P, Fang L H, et al. 2014. Double difference location of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake sequences in Yunnan province in 2014. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese),57(9):3042-3051,doi:10.6038/cjg20140929.
[18]  Xu L S, Du H L, Yan C, et al. 2013a. A method for determination of earthquake hypocentroid: time-reversal imaging technique I—Principle and numerical tests. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(4): 1190-1206.
[19]  Xu L S, Yan C, Zhang X, et al. 2013b. A method for determination of earthquake hypocentroid: Time-reversal imaging technique—An examination based on people-made earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(12): 4009-4027.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133