全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2013年4月20日四川芦山地震强地面运动三要素特征分析

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20140615, PP. 1836-1846

Keywords: 芦山地震,强地面运动,幅值,持时,反应谱,震害影响

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

2013年4月20日四川省芦山县境内发生MS7.0级地震,地震造成196人死亡,21人失踪,11470人受伤,震中最大烈度IX.地震发生后,中国数字强震动观测网络和成都市地震烈度速报网络分别获得了114组和63组3分量强震动记录.记录得出在近场加速度幅值较高,与汶川地震峰值相当,然而震害却不严重.本文介绍了这些记录的基本情况,分析了其地震动三要素(幅值、持时、频谱)特征以及对建筑物结构的潜在影响.分析结果表明:芦山地震PGA(地震动峰值加速度)与我国常用的霍俊荣地震动预测方程较一致,高于即将颁布的第五代区划图中使用的预测方程;PGV(地震动峰值速度)与第五代区划图中使用的预测方程基本一致;Significant持时和Bracketed持时高于全球经验预测方程,且Bracketed持时衰减显著慢于全球平均水平;典型11个幅值较大记录的5%阻尼比加速度反应谱峰值周期都在0.1~0.2s范围内,且谱值远高于规范设计谱,但在周期0.3s之后迅速下降至设计谱以下;芦山地震地震动PGV值较小以及对应我国中小城市和城镇主要建筑物的结构自振周期范围(0.3~1s)内加速度反应谱远低于规范设计谱,可用于解释其震害相对较轻的原因.

References

[1]  Bolt B A. 1973. Duration of strong ground motions. 5th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., Roma, Italy, Vol1, 1304-1313.
[2]  Bommer J J, Martinez-Pereira A. 2000. Strong motion parameters: definition, usefulness and predictability. 12th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., New Zealand: Auckland, paper no. 206.
[3]  Bommer J J, Stafford P J, Alarcon J E. 2009. Empirical equations for the prediction of the significant, bracketed, and uniform duration of earthquake ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 99(6): 3217-3233.
[4]  Boore D M. 2001. Effect of baseline corrections on displacements and response spectra for several recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 91(5): 1199-1211.
[5]  General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People''s Republic of China. 2008. The Chinese seismic intensity scale (GB/T 17742-2008) (in Chinese). Beijing: China Standards Press.
[6]  Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People''s Republic of China. 2010. Code for seismic design of buildings (GB50011-2010) (in Chinese). Beijing: China Architecture &Building Press.
[7]  Ren Y F, Wen R Z, Yamanaka H, et al. 2013. Site effects by generalized inversion technique using strong motion recordings of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(2): 165-184.
[8]  Trifunac M D, Brady A G. 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 65(3): 581-626.
[9]  Wang D, Xie L L, Abrahamson N A, et al. 2010. Comparison of strong ground motion from the Wenchuan, China, earthquake of 12 May 2008 with the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) ground-motion models. Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 100(5B): 2381-2395.
[10]  Wang G Q, Zhou X Y, Zhang P Z, et al. 2002. Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22(1): 73-96.
[11]  Yu Y X, Wang S Y. 2006. Attenuation relations for horizontal peak ground acceleration and response spectrum in Eastern and Western China. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention (in Chinese), 1(3): 206-217.
[12]  Hu J J. 2009. Directivity effect of near-fault ground motion and super-shear rupture (in Chinese). Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration.
[13]  Huo J R. 1989. Study on the attenuation laws of strong earthquake ground motion near the source (in Chinese). Harbin: Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration.
[14]  Kawase H. 2011. Strong motion characteristics and their damage impact to structures during the off pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake of March 11, 2011;How extraordinary was this M9.0 earthquake? 4th IASPEI/IAEE International Symposium: Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, Santa Barbara, U.S.A, 1-13.
[15]  Kawashima K, Aizawa K. 1989. Bracketed and normalized durations of earthquake ground acceleration. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 18(7): 1041-1051.
[16]  Lei J C, Gao M T, Yu Y X. 2007. Seismic motion attenuation relations in Sichuan and adjacent areas. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 29(5): 500-511.
[17]  Liu Q F, Li X J. 2009. Preliminary analysis of the hanging wall effect and velocity pulse of the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 8(2): 165-177.
[18]  Lu S N, Zhai C H, Xie L L. 2013. Characteristics of duration of ground motion during the Wenchuan earthquake. J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. (in Chinese), 33(2): 1-7.
[19]  Wang W M, Hao J L, Yao Z X. 2013. Preliminary result for rupture process of Apr. 20, 2013 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(4): 1412-1417.
[20]  Wen R Z, Ren Y F, Huang X T, et al. 2013. Strong motion records and their engineering damage implications for Lushan Earthquake on April 20, 2013. J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. (in Chinese), 33(4): 1-14.
[21]  Yu Y X, Li S Y, Xiao L. 2013. Development of ground motion attenuation relations for the new seismic hazard map of China. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention (in Chinese), 8(1): 24-33.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133