全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2010年青海玉树地震同震-震后形变场特征及演化过程

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20130715, PP. 2280-2291

Keywords: 玉树,同震,震后,InSAR,形变场演化

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

基于星载合成孔径雷达差分干涉测量技术(DInSAR)和4期ENVISAT/ASAR雷达数据,获得了不同时间基线的三个同震干涉形变场和两个震后干涉形变场,并对这五个在时段上互有重叠的形变场进行了综合分析.结果表明,玉树地震同震形变场为围绕发震断层NW展布的椭圆形干涉条纹,覆盖范围约89km×59km.断层运动性质为左旋走滑.两盘最大视线向相对形变量至少达45cm,最大形变出现在结古镇附近.时间基线不同的同震形变场总体上基本一致,但两盘最大相对形变量和局部形变存在差异.震后时间较长的干涉对反映的最大形变量反而减小;在震后时间较短的干涉对上于结古镇西南侧观测到的局部形变,在震后时间较长的干涉对上却没有出现.分析认为在形变量最大的结古镇附近可能出现了震后快速弹性回弹,导致随震后时间延续,形变量反而减小的现象.玉树地震震后形变主要出现在断层附近、震后不久的时段内,形变量在8cm以下,具有与同震方向一致和相反的两种震后形变方式.在结古镇西南观测到一个与同震形变相反的局部沉降,应为震后弹性回弹.在微观震中处的断层附近观测到与同震方向一致的震后形变,可能是震后余滑.通过对地震前后不同时间基线的多个干涉对的联合对比分析,可以在一定程度上区分同震形变与震后形变,更好地研究地震引起的变形过程,特别是地震断层附近短期震后形变场的演化过程,为进一步研究断层带的岩性特征、物理力学及运动特性提供约束.

References

[1]  郭华东, 王心源, 李新武等. 多模式SAR玉树地震协同分析. 科学通报, 2010, 55(13): 1195-1199. Guo H D, Wang X Y, Li X W, et al. Yushu earthquake synergic analysis using multimodal SAR datasets. Chinese Sci. Bull., 2010, 55(31): 3499-3503, doi: l0.1007/s11434.010-4078-3.
[2]  沈强, 乔学军, 王琪等. 中国玉树MW6.9地震InSAR地表形变特征分析. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2010, 30(3): 5-9. Shen Q, Qiao X J, Wang Q, et al. Characteristic analysis of coseismic deformation of Yushu MW6.9 earthquake from InSAR images. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics (in Chinese), 2010, 30(3): 5-9.
[3]  Li Z H, Elliott J R, Feng W P, et al..The 2010 Mw6.8 Yushu (Qinghai, China) earthquake: Constraints provided by InSAR and body wave seismology. J. Geophys. Res., 2011, 116(B10): B10302, doi: 10.1029/2011JB008358.
[4]  Tobita M, Nishimura T, Kobayashi T, et al. Estimation of coseismic deformation and a fault model of the 2010 Yushu earthquake using PALSAR interferometry data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2011, 307(3-4): 430-438, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.017.
[5]  Zha X J, Dai Z Y, Ge L L, et al. Fault geometry and slip distribution of the 2010 Yushu earthquakes inferred from InSAR measurement. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011, 101(4): 1951-1958, doi: 10.1785/0120100192.
[6]  张培震, 邓起东, 张国民等. 中国大陆的强震活动与活动地块. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2003, 33(增刊): 12-20. Zhang P Z, Deng Q D, Zhang G M, et al. Active tectonic blocks and strong earthquakes in the continent of China. Sci. China Der. D-Earth Sci., 2003, 46(S2): 13-24.
[7]  闻学泽, 徐锡伟, 郑荣章等. 甘孜—玉树断裂的平均滑动速率与近代大地震破裂. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2003, 33(增刊): 199-208. Wen X Z, Xu X W, Zheng R Z, et al. Average ship-rate and recent large earthquake ruptures along the Garzê-Yushu Fault. Sci. China Ser. D-Earth. Sci., 2003, 46(1): 276-288.
[8]  彭华, 马秀敏, 白嘉启等. 甘孜玉树断裂带第四纪活动特征. 地质力学学报, 2006, 12(3): 295-304. Peng H, Ma X M, Bai J Q, et al. Characteristics of quaternary activities of the Garzê-Yushu fault zone. Journal of Geomechanics (in Chinese), 2006, 12(3): 295-304.
[9]  张永志, 崔笃信, 王琪等. 利用GPS资料研究区域地壳应力场变化与地震活动关系. 地震学报, 2000, 22(5): 449-456. Zhang Y Z, Cui D X, Wang Q, et al. Relationship between regional stress field variation and earthquake activities from GPS data. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 22(5): 449-456.
[10]  王小亚, 朱文耀, 符养等. GPS监测的中国及其周边现时地壳形变. 地球物理学报, 2002, 45(2): 198-209. Wang X Y, Zhu W Y, Fu Y, et al. Present-time crustal deformation in china and its surrounding regions by GPS. Chinese J. Geophys.(in Chinese), 2002, 45(2): 198-209.
[11]  江在森, 马宗晋, 张希等. GPS初步结果揭示的中国大陆水平应变场与构造变形. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(3): 352-358. Jiang Z S, Ma Z J, Zhang X, Wang, et al. Horizontal strain field and tectonic deformation of china mainland revealed by preliminary GPS result. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 2003, 46(3): 352-358.
[12]  陈立春, 王虎, 冉永康等. 玉树MS7.1级地震地表破裂与历史大地震. 科学通报, 2010, 55(13): 1200-1205. Chen L C, Wang H, Ran Y K, et al. The Ms7.1 Yushu earthquake surface rupture and large historical earthquakes on the Garzê-Yushu Fault. Chinese Sci. Bull., 2010, 55(31):3504-3509, doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-4079-2.
[13]  李闽峰, 邢成起, 蔡长星等. 玉树断裂活动性研究. 地震地质, 1995, 17(3): 218-224. Li M F, Xing C Q, Cai C X, et al. Research on activity of YuShu fault. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 1995, 17(3): 218-224.
[14]  Shan X J, Ma J, Wang C L, et al. Co-seismic ground deformation and source Parameters of Mani M7.9 earthquake inferred from Spaceborne D-InSAR observation data. Science in China (Series D), 2004, 47(6): 481-488.
[15]  Shen Z K, Sun J B, Zhang P Z, et al. Slip maxima at fault junctions and rupturing of barriers during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Nature Geoscience, 2009, 2(10): 718-724, doi: 10.1038/NGEO636.
[16]  Qu C Y, Shan X J, Zhang G H, et al. Coseismic displacement field of the Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake in 2008 derived using differential radar interferometry. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2010, 4(1): 043516, doi: 10.1117/12. 866087.
[17]  郭华东. 雷达对地观测理论与应用. 北京: 科学出版社. 2000. Guo H D. The Theory and Application of Radar Earth Observation (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[18]  罗三明, 杨国华, 董运洪等. 利用PSInSAR时间序列研究拉奎拉地震位移场变化特征. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(4): 1307-1315. Luo S M, Yang G H, Dong Y H, et al. Research displacement field characteristics on L''Aquila earthquake from PSInSAR time series. Progress in Geophys. (in Chinese), 2012, 27(4): 1307-1315.
[19]  冯万鹏, 李振洪, 李春来. 利用InSAR确定2009年4月6日Mw6.3拉奎拉(Italy)地震最优震源模型. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(5): 1550-1559. Feng W P, Li Z H, Li C L. Optimal source parameters of the 6 April 2009 Mw6.3 L''Aquila, Italy earthquake from InSAR observations. Progress in Geophys. (in Chinese), 2010, 25(5): 1550-1559.
[20]  丁伟, 汪长城, 李志伟等. 基于改进LAMBDA方法的PSInSAR相位解缠. 地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(5): 1839-1848. Ding W, Wang C C, Li Z W et al. An improved LAMBDA method for PSInSAR phase unwrapping. Progress in Geophys. (in Chinese), 2011, 26(5): 1839-1848.
[21]  Zhang Y, Xu L S, Chen Y T. Fast inversion of rupture process of the 14 April 2010 Yushu, Qinghai, earthquake. Earthquake Science, 2010, 23(3): 201-204. doi: 10.1007/s11589-010-0715-9.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133