全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

2014年8月3日云南鲁甸6.5级地震序列破裂过程研究

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20150918, PP. 3232-3238

Keywords: 鲁甸MS6.5地震,主地震,相对定位,破裂过程

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文利用主地震相对定位法,对2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震序列中的8月3日—9月30日地震进行了重新定位,借助于时空图像分析方法,对本次地震破裂过程进行了分析,得到如下结果:(1)2014年鲁甸MS6.5地震主要沿NW向破裂,存在沿NE向破裂的成分,但是NE向破裂并不明显;(2)地震破裂时,主要从主震震中处往ES方向传播,破裂带长度大约为10km,破裂面近乎直立;(3)余震活动主要集中于主震上方区域,震源深度大于主震的余震稀少.根据上述结果,结合当地的地震构造情况和本次地震的震源机制解,分析表明,本次地震的破裂面为NW向,其发震断层为包谷垴—小河断裂的可能性很大.

References

[1]  Chen X Z, Guo T S, Zhu L R. 2001a. An example of earthquake nucleation of the strong continental earthquakes. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 23(2): 213-216.
[2]  Chen X Z, Gai Z X, Zhou S Y, et al. 2001b. The investigation of rupture process of the Xiuyan 5.4 earthquake on November 29, 1999. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 23(6): 659-662.
[3]  Chen X Z, Lü J, Wang H M. 2008. Investigation on rupture process of the Jiujiang-Ruichang earthquake sequence of November 26, 2005. Earthquake (in Chinese), 28(1):100-106.
[4]  Chen Y T, Xu L S, Li X, et al. 1996. Source process of the 1990 Gonghe, China, earthquake and tectonic stress field in the Northeastern Qinghai-Xizang (Tibetan) plateau. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 146(3-4): 697-715.
[5]  Hurukawa N. 1998. The 1995 Off-Etorofu earthquake: joint relocation of foreshocks, the mainshock, and aftershocks and implication for the earthquake nucleation process. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 88(5): 1112-1126.
[6]  Liu C L, Zheng Y, Xiong X, et al. 2014. Rupture process of MS6.5 Ludian earthquake constrained by regional broadband seismograms. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3028-3037, doi: 10.6038/cig20140927.
[7]  Ohnaka M, Kuwahara Y. 1990. Characteristic features of local breakdown near a crack-tip in the transition zone from nucleation to unstable rupture during stick-slip shear failure. Tectonophysics, 175(1-3): 197-220.
[8]  Ohnaka M. 1992. Earthquake source nucleation: a physical model for short-term precursors. Tectonophysics, 211(1-4): 149-178.
[9]  Wang W L, Wu J P, Fang L H, et al. 2014. Double difference location of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake sequences in Yunnan province in 2014. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3042-3051, doi: 10.6038/cig20140929.
[10]  Xu L S, Chen Y T. 1997. Inversion of source parameters of Gonghe earthquake by using broadband digital seismic wave data. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 19(2): 113-128.
[11]  Xu L S, Chen Y T. 1999. Temporal-spatial rupture process of the 1997 Mani, Tibet earthquake. Acta Seismologica Sinica (in Chinese), 21(5): 449-459.
[12]  Xu L S, Zhang X, Yan C, et al. 2014. Analysis of the Love waves for the source complexity of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3006-3017, doi: 10.6038/cig20140925.
[13]  Xu X W, Jiang G Y, Yu G H, et al. 2014. Discussion on seismogenic fault of the Ludian MS6.5 earthquake and its tectonic attribution. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3060-3068. doi: 10.6038/cig20140931.
[14]  Zhang G W, Lei J S, Liang S S, et al. 2014. Relocations and focal mechanism solutions of the 3th August 2014 Ludian, Yunnan MS6.5 earthquake sequence. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3018-3027, doi: 10. 6038/cig20140926.
[15]  Zhang Y, Xu L S, Chen Y T, et al. 2014. Rupture process of the 3 August 2014 Ludian Yunnan, Mw6.1 (MS6.5) earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(9): 3052-3059, doi: 10.6038/cig20140930.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133