全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

答“评'紫坪铺水库造成孔隙弹性耦合变化及其对2008年汶川地震触发作用'二维模拟的局限性”

DOI: 10.6038/cjg20150432, PP. 1462-1465

Keywords: 紫坪铺水库,二维模型,汶川地震,断层弱化,整体影响

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

程惠红等(2015)在"评'紫坪铺水库造成孔隙弹性耦合变化及其对2008年汶川地震触发作用'二维模拟的局限性"一文中提出,陶玮等(2014)采用二维模型模拟紫坪铺水库造成孔隙弹性耦合变化是一个不足,夸大了汶川地震震源处库仑应力增长值.我们认为采用二维模型模拟水库造成汶川地震震源处库仑应力变化确实可能存在一定偏差,但不会如程惠红等认为的"与三维模型相比夸大三倍".这是因为在程惠红等引用的论证中,二维模型计算中选取了接近水库最大剖面宽度而不是水库平均剖面宽度作为加载量参数,造成计算得到震源处库仑应力明显夸大.此外,陶玮等(2014)提出论断的主要依据不是"震源处"库仑应力值的大小,而是紫坪铺水库蓄水"由浅入深影响到整条断层,尤其对浅层范围的加载作用明显,达上百千帕,为整个断层面的失稳提供了基础".初始破裂的发生既可能是由水库蓄水引起,也可能是并非水库蓄水造成的一次普通构造小震,但其发生引发断层面上部已被水库蓄水弱化部分的连锁失稳而发生大震.即汶川地震既可能为直接触发也可能为间接触发,而我们的研究结果认为地震的发生完全可能由间接触发产生.若仅纠结于"震源处"的库仑应力变化,则忽视了水库蓄水影响的主体.水库蓄水对地震触发作用是一个复杂问题,相对这一问题所涉及的一系列不确定性因素来说,二维模拟的局限性所造成的影响并不很大也不是最大的,也不妨碍我们据此得出紫坪铺水库蓄水促进汶川地震发生的结论.

References

[1]  Cheng H H,Zheng L,Zhang B, et al. 2015. The 2D limitation of "Triggering effect of the Zipingpu Reservoir on the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan, China, Earthquake due to poroelastic coupling". Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 58(4):1458-1461.
[2]  Domenico P A, Schwartz F W. 1998. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 171.
[3]  Ingebritsen S E, Manning C E. 1999. Geological implications of a permeability-depth curve for the continental crust. Geology, 27(12): 1107-1110.
[4]  Lei X L. 2011. Possible roles of the Zipingpu Reservoir in triggering the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 40(4): 844-854, doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.004.
[5]  Liu Y Z, Ma J, Ma W T. 2014. The role of the Zipingpu reservoir in the generation of the Wenchuan earthquake. Earth Science Frontiers, 21(1):150-160.
[6]  Shmonov V M, Vitiovtova V M, Zharikov A V, et al. 2002. Fluid permeability of the continental crust: estimation from experimental data. Geochemistry International, 40(S1): S3-S13.
[7]  Tao W, Masterlark T, Shen Z K, et al. 2014. Triggering effect of the Zipingpu Reservoir on the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan, China, earthquake due to poroelastic coupling. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 57(10): 3318-3331, doi: 10.6038/cjg20141019.
[8]  Tao W, Shen Z K, Masterlark T, et al. 2014. The Zipingpu Reservoir triggering of the 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, China, due to poroelastic coupling. AGU Fall Meeting, S51A-4405.
[9]  Wang H L, Zhang X D, Zhou L Q, et al. 2012. Study on the relationship between fluid infiltration and Qs tomography of the crust in Zipingpu reservoir area. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 55(2): 526-537, doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.02.015.
[10]  Zheng L, Zhang H, Sun Y J, et al. 2013. Comparison of 2D and 3D finite element simulations in the research of reservoir induced earthquakes. Earthquake (in Chinese), 33(4): 162-171.
[11]  Ingebritsen S E, Manning C E. 2010. Permeability of the continental crust: dynamic variations inferred from seismicity and metamorphism. Geofluids, 10(1-2): 193-205, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-8123.2010.00278.x.
[12]  Lei X L, Ma S L, Wen X Z, et al. 2008. Integrated analysis of stress and regional seismicity by surface loading—A case study of Zipingpu reservoir. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 30(4): 1046-1064.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133