全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

管制俘获成因的定性比较分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.201105087

Keywords: 管制俘获, 定性比较分析, 直接收买, 游说

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

针对现有管制理论始终未能对管制俘获成因给出有说服力的解释这一缺陷,采用模糊定性比较分析方法作为改进策略.通过对国内部分企业高管进行深度访谈,发现管制俘获现象背后隐藏着不同的交易模式,国有企业常通过自身影响力来影响政府出台对其有利的管制政策,而民营企业或初创企业则更多通过行政贿赂的方式俘获政府官员以换取政策的变通执行,与此同时,这种交易模式的差异性又与行业集中度及政府干预程度密切相关.

References

[1]  黄荣贵,桂勇. 互联网与业主集体抗争:一项基于定性比较分析方法的研究[J]. 社会学研究,2009,5(24):29-56. ?HUANG Ronggui, GUI Yong. Internet and the owners of collective protest: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis [J]. Sociology, 2009, 5(24): 29-56.?
[2]  CONWAY P, G NICOLETTI. Product market regulation in the non-manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: measurement and highlights[R]. Paris:OECD, 2006: 1-60.?
[3]  HELLMAN J S, JONES G, KAUFMANN D. Seize the state, seize the day: state capture, corruption, and influence in transition[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, 31(4): 751-773.?
[4]  DAL BO P, DI T R. "Plata o Plomo?": bribe and punishment in a theory of political influence[J]. American Political Science Review, 2006,100(1):41-53.?
[5]  NAURO F, GIOVANNONI F. Lobbying, corruption and political influence[J]. Public Choice, 2007,131(1/2):1-21.?
[6]  FACCIO M, MASULIS R, JOHN J. Political connections and corporate bailouts[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2006,61(6):2597-2635.?
[7]  BERTRAND M, KRAMARAZ F, SCHOAR A, et al. Politicians, firms and the political business cycle: evidence from France[R]. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2007.?
[8]  RAGIN C. The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987: 168-184.?
[9]  RIHOUX B, RAGIN C. Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009:125-133.?
[10]  WOOD B D, WATERMAN R W. The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy[J]. The American Political Science Review,1991,35(3): 801-828.?
[11]  AUSTEN-SMITH D. Sophisticated sincerity: voting over endogenous agendas[J]. The American Political Science Review, 1978, 81(4): 1323-1330.?
[12]  MCCORMICK R E, TOLLISON R D. Legislatures as unions[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1978, 86(1): 63-78.?
[13]  石淑华. 政府俘获理论的比较分析――芝加哥学派与弗吉尼亚学派[J]. 福建论坛: 人文社会科学版,2006, 12: 8-11. ?SHI Shuhua. The comparation of the regulatory capture―the Chicago school and virginal school[J]. The Fujian Forum: Social and Science version,2006, 12: 8-11. ?
[14]  BARON D P, MYERSON R B. Regulating a monopolist with unknown costs[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 911-930.?
[15]  HELLMAN J S, JONES G, KAUFMANN D.Measuring governance, corruption, and state capture――how firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economic[R]. Washington DC: World Bank, 2000: 1-51.?

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133